Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Animal Welfare Institute

2000 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Gary Ackerman 100%
Daniel Akaka, Sr. 100%
Wayne Allard 75%
Thomas Allen 83%
Rob Andrews 100%
Richard Armey 0%
Brian Baird 83%
Richard Hugh Baker 17%
Cass Ballenger 17%
James Barcia 66%
Bob Barr, Jr. 17%
Roscoe Bartlett 33%
Charlie Bass 66%
Max Baucus 25%
Evan Bayh 50%
Bob Bennett 0%
Kenneth Bentsen, Jr. 50%
Douglas Bereuter 33%
Shelley Berkley 100%
Howard Berman 100%
Marion Berry 33%
Judy Biggert 83%
Michael Bilirakis 50%
Jeff Bingaman 50%
Rod Blagojevich 83%
Sherwood Boehlert 66%
Kit Bond 25%
Henry Bonilla 17%
David Edward Bonior 66%
Mary Bono Mack 33%
Robert Borski, Jr. 66%
Leonard Boswell 17%
Rick Boucher 50%
Allen Boyd, Jr. 17%
John Breaux 0%
Ed Bryant 17%
Jim Bunning 25%
Conrad Burns 25%
Dan Burton 17%
Steve Buyer 0%
Robert Byrd 75%
Herbert Callahan 17%
Ben Campbell 25%
Chris Cannon 0%
Julia Carson 100%
Mike Castle 66%
Eva Clayton 50%
Joseph Maxwell Cleland 75%
Robert Clement 50%
Michael Collins 17%
Larry Combest 17%
Gary Condit 50%
Kent Conrad 25%
John Cooksey 17%
Jerry Costello 83%
Christopher Cox 33%
William Coyne 66%
Larry Craig 0%
Robert Cramer 33%
Philip Crane 66%
Barbara Cubin 17%
Randall Cunningham 17%
Thomas Daschle 50%
James Davis 50%
Thomas Davis III 66%
Bill Delahunt 100%
Thomas DeLay 17%
James DeMint 33%
Peter Deutsch 100%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 50%
Norm Dicks 83%
Chris Dodd 100%
Pete Domenici, Jr. 0%
Calvin Dooley 66%
John Doolittle 0%
Byron Dorgan 25%
David Dreier 0%
Jennifer Dunn 33%
John Edwards 50%
Chet Edwards 50%
Vern Ehlers 50%
Bob Ehrlich, Jr. 33%
Jo Ann Emerson 17%
Philip English 50%
Bob Etheridge 66%
Lane Evans 100%
Terry Everett 17%
Russ Feingold 75%
Bob Filner 100%
Peter Fitzgerald 100%
Ernest Fletcher 17%
Mark Foley 50%
Harold Ford, Jr. 50%
Vito Fossella, Jr. 50%
Barney Frank 83%
William Frist 50%
Jonas Frost III 33%
Elton Gallegly 66%
John Ganske 17%
George Gekas 17%
Richard Andrew Gephardt 50%
Jim Gibbons 17%
Wayne Gilchrest 33%
Paul Gillmor 33%
Benjamin Gilman 100%
Charlie Gonzalez 66%
Virgil Goode, Jr. 33%
Bart Gordon 50%
Porter Goss 66%
Daniel Graham 75%
William Phillip Gramm 0%
Mark Green 50%
James Greenwood 83%
Judd Gregg 25%
Gilbert Gutknecht 17%
Tony Hall 83%
James Hansen 17%
Robert Hayes 17%
J.D. Hayworth, Jr. 17%
Joel Hefley 50%
Jesse Helms 25%
Wally Herger, Jr. 17%
Baron Hill 50%
Van Hilleary 17%
Earl Hilliard, Jr. 50%
Maurice Hinchey 83%
David Lee Hobson 50%
PA Commissioner At-Large Joseph Hoeffel 66%
Pete Hoekstra 0%
Thomas Holden 33%
Ernest Hollings 25%
Darlene Hooley 66%
Stephen Horn 100%
John Nathan Hostettler 0%
Amory Houghton, Jr. 66%
Kenny Hulshof 50%
Duncan Hunter 0%
Y. Tim Hutchinson 0%
Kay Hutchison 0%
Henry Hyde 50%
Daniel Inouye 25%
Ernest Istook, Jr. 17%
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 83%
William Jefferson 33%
James Merrill Jeffords 75%
William Lewis Jenkins 0%
Christopher John 0%
Nancy Johnson 83%
Paul Kanjorski 33%
Sue Kelly 66%
Edward Kennedy, Sr. 75%
Patrick Kennedy 100%
Dale Kildee 100%
Carolyn Kilpatrick 100%
Gerald Kleczka 100%
Joseph Knollenberg 17%
Herb Kohl 75%
James Kolbe 50%
Dennis Kucinich 100%
Jon Kyl 50%
John LaFalce 50%
Ray LaHood 33%
Nicholas Lampson 50%
Tom Lantos 66%
Steve LaTourette 50%
James Leach 66%
Jerry Lewis 33%
Ron Lewis 17%
Joe Lieberman 100%
Blanche Lincoln 25%
John Linder 17%
William Lipinski 100%
Trent Lott, Sr. 0%
Ken Lucas 33%
Dick Lugar 50%
William Luther 83%
James Maloney 100%
Don Manzullo 0%
Frank Mascara 33%
Robert Matsui 66%
Karen McCarthy 66%
James McCrery III 17%
John McHugh 17%
Scott McInnis 17%
Cynthia Ann McKinney 83%
Michael McNulty 66%
Martin Meehan 100%
Carrie Meek 50%
Juanita Millender-McDonald 83%
Dan Miller 50%
Patsy Takemoto Mink 66%
Alan Mollohan 17%
Dennis Moore 66%
Constance Morella 83%
Frank Murkowski 0%
Jack Murtha 17%
Sue Myrick 50%
George Nethercutt, Jr. 17%
Robert William Ney 17%
Don Nickles 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top