Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: United Conservatives of Ohio

1999-2000 Positions

Issues: Conservative
State Office District Name Party Rating
OH U.S. House 3 Joyce Beatty Democratic 30%
OH State House 12 John Barnes, Jr. Democratic 35%
OH State House 48 Kirk Schuring Republican 63%
OH State House 61 Ronald Young Republican 85%
OH State Senate 29 W. Scott Oelslager Republican 70%
OH State Senate 31 Jay Hottinger Republican 85%
OH Council Member 2 Dale Miller 30%
OH Council Member 3 Dan Brady 50%
OH Commissioner At-Large Anthony Core 67%
Dixie Allen 43%
Jeffry Armbruster 80%
James Aslanides 57%
Catherine Barrett 45%
Louis Blessing, Jr. 85%
Samuel Britton 30%
Stephen Buehrer 80%
James Callender 82%
Charles Calvert 90%
John Carey, Jr. 68%
Jim Carnes 85%
Gary Cates 85%
Patricia Clancy 73%
Rex Damschroder 78%
Dean DePiero 53%
Gregory DiDonato 60%
L. George Distel 45%
Ben Espy 40%
David Evans 68%
Richard Finan 85%
Bryan Flannery 40%
Jack Ford 30%
Linda Furney 40%
Timothy Grendell 95%
Robert Hagan 33%
William Hartnett 50%
Leigh Herington 50%
Nancy Hollister 63%
James Hoops 68%
Larry Householder 70%
Ed Jerse 53%
Gregory Jolivette 68%
Peter Lawson Jones 30%
Sally Conway Kilbane 65%
K. Eileen Krupinski 50%
Mark Mallory 40%
Rhine McLin 50%
George Daniel Metelsky 47%
Kerry Robert Metzger 60%
I. Miller, Jr. 35%
Larry Mumper 85%
Scott Nein 90%
William Ogg 45%
Lynn Olman 68%
Sylvester Patton, Jr. 33%
Jeanine Perry 45%
Jon Peterson 68%
C.J. Prentiss 50%
Chris Redfern 17%
Twyla Roman 66%
Amy Salerno 63%
Michael Shoemaker 53%
Robert Spada 80%
Dennis Stapleton 68%
Erin Sullivan 50%
Joe Sulzer, Sr. 51%
Barbara Ann Sykes 44%
James Trakas 83%
Lynn Wachtmann 90%
Doug White 85%
John Willamowski 85%
Bryan Williams 78%
Charlie Wilson, Jr. 42%
Ann Womer-Benjamin 55%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top