Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Virginia League of Conservation Voters

2001 Positions

Issues: Environment
State Office District Name Party Rating
VA U.S. House 9 Morgan Griffith Republican 57%
VA State House 1 Terry Kilgore Republican 43%
VA State House 13 Bob Marshall Republican 71%
VA State House 22 Kathy Byron Republican 50%
VA State House 25 Steve Landes Republican 33%
VA State House 28 William Howell Republican 33%
VA State House 36 Ken Plum Democratic 75%
VA State House 39 Vivian Watts Democratic 63%
VA State House 42 David Albo Republican 33%
VA State House 54 Bobby Orrock, Sr. Republican 57%
VA State House 61 Thomas Wright, Jr. Republican 50%
VA State House 62 Riley Ingram Republican 57%
VA State House 65 Lee Ware, Jr. Republican 63%
VA State House 66 Kirk Cox Republican 50%
VA State House 73 John O'Bannon III Republican 43%
VA State House 76 Chris Jones Republican 50%
VA State House 77 Lionell Spruill, Sr. Democratic 71%
VA State House 79 Johnny Joannou Democratic 67%
VA State House 86 Thomas Rust Republican 17%
VA State Senate 3 Thomas Norment, Jr. Republican 100%
VA State Senate 7 Frank Wagner Republican 50%
VA State Senate 10 John Watkins Republican 25%
VA State Senate 11 Stephen Martin Republican 33%
VA State Senate 12 Walter Stosch Republican 75%
VA State Senate 13 Richard Hayden Black Republican 43%
VA State Senate 15 Frank Ruff, Jr. Republican 33%
VA State Senate 18 Louise Lucas Democratic 33%
VA State Senate 21 John Edwards Democratic 67%
VA State Senate 23 Stephen Newman Republican 25%
VA State Senate 24 Emmett Hanger, Jr. Republican 33%
VA State Senate 29 Charles Colgan, Sr. Democratic 50%
VA State Senate 32 Janet Howell Democratic 100%
VA State Senate 35 Dick Saslaw Democratic 33%
VA State Senate 36 Toddy Puller Democratic 67%
VA Justice of the Supreme Court Bill Mims 75%
VA Mayor At-Large Dwight Jones Democratic 63%
Watkins Abbitt, Jr. 63%
James Frederick Almand 71%
Kristen Amundson 71%
Ward Armstrong 71%
William Barlow 71%
Warren Barry 33%
Viola Osborne Baskerville 71%
Robert Bloxom 50%
Bill Bolling 100%
Thomas Bolvin 25%
Robert Brink 71%
George Broman Jr. 29%
L. Bryant, Jr. 43%
Leslie Byrne 100%
Vince Callahan, Jr. 43%
John Chichester 100%
Mary Taylor Christian 60%
J. Paul Councill, Jr. 29%
Flora Davis Crittenden 78%
L. Karen Darner 78%
Jeannemarie Devolites Davis 29%
James Hardy Dillard II 50%
Thelma Drake 25%
Allen Wayne Dudley 57%
Franklin Hall 86%
Phillip Hamilton 38%
Frank Hargrove, Sr. 57%
Charles Hawkins 33%
Edd Houck 75%
Robert Hull 43%
Joseph Johnson, Jr. 57%
Jerrauld Corey Jones 67%
W.B. Keister 44%
Benjamin Joseph Lambert III 33%
Allen Louderback 75%
Henry Marsh III 75%
Madison Ellis Marye 100%
W. Henry Maxwell 50%
Joe May 25%
Bob McDonnell 14%
Michéle McQuigg 57%
Kenneth Melvin 57%
Kevin Grey Miller 33%
Yvonne Miller 50%
Brian Moran 67%
Harvey Morgan 88%
Samuel Nixon, Jr. 43%
James O'Brien, Jr. 33%
Harry Parrish 25%
Clarence Phillips 38%
Albert Pollard, Jr. 100%
Harry Potts, Jr. 33%
Phillip Puckett 75%
Bob Purkey 29%
Lacey Putney 29%
Frederick Quayle 33%
Melanie Rapp 33%
John Spence Reid 38%
D. Nick Rerras 25%
William Reynolds 67%
John Adams Rollison III 50%
James Scott 71%
Beverly Sherwood 38%
James Shuler 71%
Kenneth Stolle 33%
Jackie Thomas Stump 38%
Terrie Suit 50%
Robert Tata 43%
Alfred Victor Thomas 100%
Patricia Ticer 100%
Malfourd Trumbo 25%
Marian Amelia Van Landingham 71%
Mitchell Van Yahres 86%
William Wampler, Jr. 33%
Leo Wardrup, Jr. 25%
Glenn Weatherholtz 43%
John Welch III 38%
Mary Margaret Whipple 100%
S. Vance Wilkins, Jr. 14%
Martin Williams 33%
Clifton Alexander Woodrum 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top