Search Form
Now choose a category »

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Virginia National Federation of Independent Business

1998-1999 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
VA U.S. House 4 Randy Forbes Republican 83%
VA U.S. House 9 Morgan Griffith Republican 86%
VA State House 1 Terry Kilgore Republican 57%
VA State House 13 Bob Marshall Republican 71%
VA State House 22 Kathy Byron Republican 100%
VA State House 25 Steve Landes Republican 86%
VA State House 28 William Howell Republican 86%
VA State House 36 Ken Plum Democratic 14%
VA State House 39 Vivian Watts Democratic 29%
VA State House 42 David Albo Republican 100%
VA State House 54 Bobby Orrock, Sr. Republican 100%
VA State House 62 Riley Ingram Republican 71%
VA State House 65 Lee Ware, Jr. Republican 86%
VA State House 66 Kirk Cox Republican 100%
VA State House 76 Chris Jones Republican 86%
VA State House 77 Lionell Spruill, Sr. Democratic 20%
VA State House 79 Johnny Joannou Democratic 29%
VA State Senate 3 Thomas Norment, Jr. Republican 50%
VA State Senate 7 Frank Wagner Republican 100%
VA State Senate 9 Aston McEachin Democratic 29%
VA State Senate 10 John Watkins Republican 67%
VA State Senate 11 Stephen Martin Republican 100%
VA State Senate 12 Walter Stosch Republican 100%
VA State Senate 13 Richard Hayden Black Republican 86%
VA State Senate 15 Frank Ruff, Jr. Republican 86%
VA State Senate 18 Louise Lucas Democratic 80%
VA State Senate 21 John Edwards Democratic 50%
VA State Senate 23 Stephen Newman Republican 100%
VA State Senate 24 Emmett Hanger, Jr. Republican 100%
VA State Senate 25 Creigh Deeds Democratic 43%
VA State Senate 29 Charles Colgan, Sr. Democratic 83%
VA State Senate 32 Janet Howell Democratic 83%
VA State Senate 35 Dick Saslaw Democratic 83%
VA Justice of the Supreme Court Bill Mims 83%
VA Mayor At-Large Dwight Jones Democratic 29%
Watkins Abbitt, Jr. 67%
James Frederick Almand 14%
Ward Armstrong 29%
William Barlow 14%
Warren Barry 83%
Viola Osborne Baskerville 14%
William Welden Bennett, Jr. 29%
Harry Blevins 71%
Robert Bloxom 71%
Bill Bolling 83%
Robert Brink 14%
L. Bryant, Jr. 100%
Vince Callahan, Jr. 33%
Eric Cantor 100%
John Chichester 83%
Mary Taylor Christian 14%
Whittington Whiteside Clement 57%
J. Paul Councill, Jr. 33%
Emily Couric 67%
Charles Cranwell 14%
Flora Davis Crittenden 29%
L. Karen Darner 14%
Jo Ann Davis 100%
Barnie Day 29%
Jay Wayne DeBoer 29%
Jeannemarie Devolites Davis 100%
Alan Arnold Diamonstein 50%
Vivian Earl Dickinson 86%
James Hardy Dillard II 57%
Thelma Drake 100%
Allen Wayne Dudley 100%
George Wallace Grayson 29%
Franklin Hall 29%
Phillip Hamilton 100%
Frank Hargrove, Sr. 29%
Paul Clinton Harris, Sr. 100%
Charles Hawkins 100%
Richard Joyner Holland 83%
Edd Houck 50%
Robert Hull 14%
Thomas Micajah Jackson, Jr. 40%
Joseph Johnson, Jr. 29%
Jerrauld Corey Jones 29%
Jay Kenneth Katzen 100%
Benjamin Joseph Lambert III 80%
Henry Marsh III 83%
Madison Ellis Marye 83%
W. Henry Maxwell 67%
Joe May 86%
Roger John McClure 100%
Bob McDonnell 100%
Michéle McQuigg 86%
Kenneth Melvin 14%
Kevin Grey Miller 100%
Yvonne Miller 50%
Brian Moran 29%
Harvey Morgan 57%
Thomas Warren Moss, Jr. 20%
Samuel Nixon, Jr. 100%
James O'Brien, Jr. 100%
Harry Parrish 67%
Clarence Phillips 29%
Harry Potts, Jr. 67%
Bob Purkey 100%
Lacey Putney 71%
Frederick Quayle 83%
John Spence Reid 86%
William Reynolds 67%
Anne Gregory Rhodes 67%
William Peters Robinson, Jr. 14%
John Adams Rollison III 86%
John Howson Rust, Jr. 86%
Edward Schrock 83%
Beverly Sherwood 100%
James Shuler 57%
Kenneth Stolle 83%
Jackie Thomas Stump 29%
Robert Tata 86%
John Harvey Tate, Jr. 29%
Alfred Victor Thomas 33%
Patricia Ticer 67%
Malfourd Trumbo 100%
Marian Amelia Van Landingham 0%
Mitchell Van Yahres 14%
William Wampler, Jr. 67%
Leo Wardrup, Jr. 100%
Glenn Weatherholtz 83%
Mary Margaret Whipple 67%
S. Vance Wilkins, Jr. 86%
Donald Williams 29%
Martin Williams 100%
Clifton Alexander Woodrum 29%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top