Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Planned Parenthood Advocates of Arizona

2001-2002 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
AZ State House 12 Eddie Farnsworth Republican 0%
AZ State House 18 Bob Robson Republican 50%
AZ State Senate 27 Leah Landrum Taylor Democratic 100%
AZ Secretary of State Ken Bennett Republican 20%
AZ Corporation Commissioner Brenda Burns Republican 25%
AZ Corporation Commissioner Gary Pierce Republican 0%
AZ Supervisor 1 Peter Rios Democratic 80%
AZ Supervisor 2 Cheryl Chase Republican 80%
AZ Superintendent of Public Instruction John Huppenthal Republican 75%
Linda Aguirre 80%
Carolyn Allen 100%
Mark Anderson 40%
Carlos Avelar II 80%
Linda Binder 100%
Jay Blanchard 80%
Robert Blendu 40%
Debra Brimhall 40%
William Brotherton 100%
Jack Brown 40%
Scott Bundgaard 20%
Meg Burton Cahill 100%
Henry Camarot 100%
Robert Cannell 75%
James Carruthers 100%
Ken Cheuvront 100%
Edward Cirillo 40%
Mark Clark 100%
Dean Cooley 40%
Chris Cummiskey 100%
Lori Daniels 33%
Franklin Flake 40%
Kathi Foster 80%
Susan Gerard 100%
Lowell Gleason 40%
Randall Gnant 100%
Linda Gray 40%
Herb Guenther 100%
Deb Gullett 100%
Darden Hamilton 25%
Phil Hanson 100%
Mary Hartley 80%
Jeff Hatch-Miller 40%
Jack Jackson, Sr. 100%
Karen Johnson 0%
Laura Knaperek 50%
James Kraft 60%
Sylvia Laughter 50%
Barbara Leff 80%
Joe Eddie Lopez 100%
John Loredo 100%
Wesley Marsh 33%
Dean Martin 20%
Steve May 100%
Harry Mitchell 100%
John Nelson 67%
Tom O'Halleran 100%
Russell Pearce 0%
David Petersen 20%
James Sedillo 100%
Tom Smith 25%
Albert Tom 100%
Stephen Tully 40%
John Verkamp 100%
Roberta Voss 100%
Christine Weason 100%
Jim Weiers 25%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top