Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Legion for the Survival of Freedom, Inc. (formerly Liberty Lobby)

1993 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Gary Ackerman 20%
Daniel Akaka, Sr. 30%
Wayne Allard 70%
Rob Andrews 40%
Bill Archer 70%
Richard Armey 70%
Henry Scott Baesler 40%
Richard Hugh Baker 50%
William Baker 70%
Cass Ballenger 70%
James Barcia 60%
Bill Barrett 70%
Roscoe Bartlett 70%
Herbert Bateman 50%
Max Baucus 20%
Anthony Beilenson 0%
Bob Bennett 70%
Douglas Bereuter 60%
Howard Berman 0%
Tom Bevill 50%
Michael Bilirakis 60%
Jeff Bingaman 20%
Thomas Bliley, Jr. 70%
Peter Blute 60%
Sherwood Boehlert 20%
Kit Bond 50%
Henry Bonilla 70%
David Edward Bonior 30%
Rick Boucher 40%
Bill Bradley 0%
John Breaux 40%
George Brown, Jr. 0%
Hank Brown 50%
Richard Bryan 70%
John Bryant 0%
Dale Bumpers 20%
Jim Bunning 90%
Conrad Burns 70%
Dan Burton 80%
Steve Buyer 70%
Robert Byrd 60%
Herbert Callahan 70%
Ben Campbell 50%
FL Justice of the Supreme Court Charles Canady 90%
Mike Castle 50%
John Chafee 20%
William Clay, Sr. 20%
Eva Clayton 20%
William Cohen 40%
Ronald Coleman 30%
Barbara-Rose Collins 20%
Cardiss Collins 10%
Michael Collins 90%
Larry Combest 60%
Gary Condit 50%
Kent Conrad 50%
Jerry Costello 60%
Paul Coverdell 60%
Christopher Cox 80%
Larry Craig 80%
Robert Cramer 70%
Philip Crane 70%
Randall Cunningham 70%
Alfonse D'Amato 50%
Patsy Ann Danner 70%
Thomas Daschle 30%
E. Kika de la Garza 40%
Thomas DeLay 70%
Ronald Dellums 20%
Peter Deutsch 10%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 70%
Jay Dickey 60%
Norm Dicks 0%
Julian Dixon 10%
Chris Dodd 10%
Robert Dole 60%
Pete Domenici, Jr. 60%
Calvin Dooley 30%
John Doolittle 90%
Byron Dorgan 40%
Robert Dornan 70%
David Dreier 70%
Jennifer Dunn 60%
Chet Edwards 50%
Bill Emerson 60%
Lane Evans 30%
Terry Everett 90%
Thomas Ewing 60%
Jim Exon 50%
Duncan McLauchlin Faircloth 90%
Harris Fawell 50%
Victor Fazio 0%
Russ Feingold 20%
Cleo Fields 20%
Jack Fields, Jr. 70%
Bob Filner 30%
Floyd Flake 10%
Wendell Ford 40%
Tillie Fowler 50%
Barney Frank 20%
Gary Franks 60%
Robert Franks 40%
Jonas Frost III 20%
Elton Gallegly 70%
Sam Gejdenson 20%
Richard Andrew Gephardt 20%
Pete Geren 60%
Sam Gibbons 10%
Wayne Gilchrest 50%
Paul Gillmor 60%
Benjamin Gilman 40%
Newt Gingrich 60%
John Glenn 20%
Henry Gonzalez 30%
Slade Gorton 40%
Porter Goss 60%
Daniel Graham 30%
William Phillip Gramm 60%
Rodney Grams 60%
Judd Gregg 50%
Steven Gunderson 60%
Tony Hall 40%
Lee Hamilton 40%
Melton Hancock 70%
James Hansen 70%
Jane Harman 20%
J. Dennis Hastert 60%
Mark Hatfield 40%
Joel Hefley 80%
W.G. Hefner 40%
Jesse Helms 80%
Wally Herger, Jr. 70%
Earl Hilliard, Jr. 30%
Maurice Hinchey 20%
David Lee Hobson 60%
Pete Hoekstra 50%
Ernest Hollings 60%
Stephen Horn 30%
Amory Houghton, Jr. 60%
Duncan Hunter 90%
Y. Tim Hutchinson 70%
Kay Hutchison 40%
Henry Hyde 60%
Daniel Inouye 20%
Andrew Jacobs, Jr. 50%
William Jefferson 10%
James Merrill Jeffords 30%
Nancy Johnson 30%
Harry Johnston 10%
J. Bennett Johnston 50%
Nancy Landon Kassebaum 50%
Dirk Kempthorne 80%
Edward Kennedy, Sr. 10%
Joseph Kennedy II 0%
Barbara Bailey Kennelly 10%
Bob Kerrey 20%
Dale Kildee 30%
Jay Kim 70%
Gerald Kleczka 20%
Scott Klug 60%
Joseph Knollenberg 60%
Herb Kohl 30%
James Kolbe 60%
Jon Kyl 60%
John LaFalce 40%
Tom Lantos 20%
Greg Laughlin 60%
Frank Lautenberg 30%
Rick Lazio 30%
James Leach 30%
Jerry Lewis 60%
Joe Lieberman 10%
Jim Lightfoot 50%
Blanche Lincoln 40%
John Linder 70%
William Lipinski 50%
Robert Livingston 60%
Trent Lott, Sr. 50%
Dick Lugar 40%
Connie Mack 50%
Thomas Manton 10%
Don Manzullo 60%
Matthew Martinez 30%
Robert Matsui 0%
Bill McCollum 70%
James McCrery III 60%
John McHugh 70%
Scott McInnis 70%
Cynthia Ann McKinney 20%
Michael McNulty 40%
Martin Meehan 10%
Carrie Meek 10%
Jan Meyers 40%
Dan Miller 70%
David Minge 30%
Patsy Takemoto Mink 20%
John Moakley 10%
Susan Molinari 50%
Alan Mollohan 70%
G.V. Montgomery 40%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top