Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: National Family Planning & Reproductive Health Association

1999-2002 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Neil Abercrombie 100%
Gary Ackerman 100%
Daniel Akaka, Sr. 100%
Todd Akin 0%
Wayne Allard 0%
Thomas Allen 100%
Rob Andrews 100%
Joe Baca, Sr. 92%
Spencer Bachus 7%
Brian Baird 100%
Richard Hugh Baker 7%
Cass Ballenger 8%
Roscoe Bartlett 0%
Charlie Bass 93%
Max Baucus 100%
Evan Bayh 83%
Bob Bennett 0%
Douglas Bereuter 0%
Shelley Berkley 100%
Howard Berman 100%
Marion Berry 7%
Judy Biggert 93%
Michael Bilirakis 7%
Jeff Bingaman 100%
Sherwood Boehlert 100%
Kit Bond 0%
Henry Bonilla 14%
Mary Bono Mack 36%
Leonard Boswell 86%
Rick Boucher 100%
Allen Boyd, Jr. 64%
John Breaux 0%
Henry Brown, Jr. 0%
Jim Bunning 0%
Conrad Burns 0%
Dan Burton 0%
Steve Buyer 7%
Robert Byrd 83%
Dave Camp 8%
Ben Campbell 50%
Chris Cannon 0%
Eric Cantor 0%
Brad Carson 71%
Julia Carson 100%
Mike Castle 64%
Lincoln Chafee 100%
Saxby Chambliss 8%
Howard Coble 7%
Michael Collins 8%
Kent Conrad 50%
Jerry Costello 0%
Christopher Cox 7%
Larry Craig 0%
Robert Cramer 57%
Philip Crane 8%
Barbara Cubin 0%
Randall Cunningham 7%
Thomas Daschle 83%
James Davis 79%
Jo Ann Davis 0%
Thomas Davis III 31%
Bill Delahunt 100%
Thomas DeLay 0%
James DeMint 0%
Peter Deutsch 100%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 7%
Norm Dicks 100%
John Dingell 69%
Chris Dodd 100%
Pete Domenici, Jr. 0%
Calvin Dooley 100%
John Doolittle 0%
Byron Dorgan 50%
David Dreier 7%
Jennifer Dunn 38%
John Edwards 100%
Chet Edwards 64%
Vern Ehlers 7%
Jo Ann Emerson 7%
Philip English 7%
Bob Etheridge 71%
Lane Evans 100%
Terry Everett 0%
Russ Feingold 100%
Michael Ferguson 0%
Bob Filner 100%
Peter Fitzgerald 0%
Mark Foley 71%
Harold Ford, Jr. 83%
Vito Fossella, Jr. 0%
Barney Frank 100%
William Frist 0%
Jonas Frost III 100%
Elton Gallegly 7%
Richard Andrew Gephardt 85%
Jim Gibbons 29%
Wayne Gilchrest 69%
Paul Gillmor 0%
Charlie Gonzalez 100%
Virgil Goode, Jr. 0%
Bart Gordon 69%
Porter Goss 7%
Daniel Graham 100%
Mark Green 0%
James Greenwood 100%
Judd Gregg 0%
Gilbert Gutknecht 0%
Charles Hagel 0%
Ralph Hall 0%
Tom Harkin 100%
Jane Harman 100%
Melissa Hart 0%
J. Dennis Hastert 0%
Doc Hastings 7%
Robert Hayes 0%
J.D. Hayworth, Jr. 0%
Joel Hefley 0%
Wally Herger, Jr. 7%
Baron Hill 54%
Maurice Hinchey 100%
David Lee Hobson 7%
Joseph Hoeffel 100%
Pete Hoekstra 7%
Thomas Holden 7%
Ernest Hollings 83%
Rush Holt, Jr. 100%
Darlene Hooley 100%
John Nathan Hostettler 0%
Amory Houghton, Jr. 86%
Kenny Hulshof 8%
Duncan Hunter 0%
Kay Hutchison 0%
Henry Hyde 0%
Daniel Inouye 100%
Ernest Istook, Jr. 0%
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 100%
William Jefferson 92%
James Merrill Jeffords 100%
William Lewis Jenkins 0%
Christopher John 8%
Nancy Johnson 100%
Tim Johnson 0%
Timothy Johnson 67%
Paul Kanjorski 7%
Ric Keller 0%
Sue Kelly 86%
Edward Kennedy, Sr. 100%
Mark Kennedy 17%
Patrick Kennedy 93%
Dale Kildee 7%
Carolyn Kilpatrick 92%
Jack Kingston 0%
Gerald Kleczka 57%
Joseph Knollenberg 7%
Herb Kohl 83%
James Kolbe 71%
Dennis Kucinich 14%
Jon Kyl 0%
Ray LaHood 0%
Nicholas Lampson 64%
Mary Landrieu 83%
Tom Lantos 100%
Tom Latham 7%
Steve LaTourette 8%
James Leach 62%
Carl Levin 100%
Jerry Lewis 15%
Ron Lewis 0%
Joe Lieberman 100%
Blanche Lincoln 83%
John Linder 0%
William Lipinski 0%
Trent Lott, Sr. 0%
Ken Lucas 0%
Dick Lugar 0%
Don Manzullo 0%
Jim Matheson 71%
Robert Matsui 100%
Carolyn McCarthy 100%
Karen McCarthy 100%
James McCrery III 7%
John McHugh 0%
CO Commissioner 2 Scott McInnis 8%
Mike McIntyre 0%
Buck McKeon 0%
Michael McNulty 18%
Martin Meehan 100%
Juanita Millender-McDonald 100%
Gary Miller 0%
George Miller 100%
Alan Mollohan 8%
Dennis Moore 86%
Jim Moran, Jr. 93%
Jack Murtha 8%
Sue Myrick 0%
George Nethercutt, Jr. 8%
Robert William Ney 8%
Don Nickles 0%
Anne Northup 7%
Charles Norwood, Jr. 8%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top