| State | Office | District | Name | Party | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UT | State House | 13 | Paul Ray | Republican | 80% |
| UT | State House | 18 | Roger Barrus | Republican | 100% |
| UT | State House | 36 | Patrice Arent | Democratic | 44% |
| UT | State House | 64 | Becky Lockhart | Republican | 100% |
| UT | State Senate | 3 | Gene Davis | Democratic | 63% |
| UT | State Senate | 4 | Patricia Jones | Democratic | 70% |
| UT | State Senate | 6 | Wayne Harper | Republican | 100% |
| UT | State Senate | 11 | Howard Stephenson | Republican | 89% |
| UT | State Senate | 14 | John Valentine | Republican | 80% |
| UT | State Senate | 15 | Margaret Dayton | Republican | 89% |
| UT | State Senate | 16 | Curt Bramble | Republican | 100% |
| UT | State Senate | 17 | Peter Knudson | Republican | 78% |
| UT | State Senate | 20 | Scott Jenkins | Republican | 100% |
| UT | State Senate | 25 | Lyle Hillyard | Republican | 88% |
| UT | State Senate | 29 | Stephen Urquhart | Republican | 100% |
| UT | Attorney General | John Swallow | Republican | 100% | |
| UT | Commissioner of Agriculture | Leonard Blackham | 100% | ||
| UT | Mayor | At-Large | Ralph Becker | 44% | |
| UT | Council Member | At-Large | David Ure | Republican | 71% |
| UT | Council Member | North | Craig Buttars | Republican | 100% |
| UT | Public Service Commissioner | Ron Allen | Democratic | 56% | |
| Doug Aagard | 90% | ||||
| Gerry Adair | 89% | ||||
| Jeff Alexander | 71% | ||||
| D. Edgar Allen | 56% | ||||
| Sheryl Allen | 78% | ||||
| Eli Anderson | 80% | ||||
| Trisha Beck | 63% | ||||
| Chad Bennion | 78% | ||||
| Cynthia Beshear | 44% | ||||
| Ron Bigelow | 89% | ||||
| Jackie Biskupski | 50% | ||||
| Duane Bourdeaux | 56% | ||||
| DeMar Bowman | 90% | ||||
| Afton Bradshaw | 67% | ||||
| Katherine Bryson | 90% | ||||
| Judy Ann Buffmire | 50% | ||||
| Don Bush | 90% | ||||
| D. Chris Buttars | 89% | ||||
| David Clark | 80% | ||||
| Stephen Clark | 89% | ||||
| David Cox | 78% | ||||
| Greg Curtis | 78% | ||||
| Scott Daniels | 50% | ||||
| Marda Dillree | 80% | ||||
| Mike Dmitrich | 67% | ||||
| Glenn Donnelson, Jr. | 100% | ||||
| Carl Duckworth | 70% | ||||
| Dan Eastman | 90% | ||||
| Beverly Ann Evans | 70% | ||||
| James Ferrin | 100% | ||||
| Ben Ferry | 90% | ||||
| Fred Fife III | 60% | ||||
| Kevin Garn | 100% | ||||
| David Gladwell | 100% | ||||
| Brent Goodfellow | 56% | ||||
| James Gowans | 70% | ||||
| Karen Hale | 83% | ||||
| Neil Hansen | 56% | ||||
| Thomas Hatch | 100% | ||||
| Parley Hellewell | 100% | ||||
| Neal Hendrickson | 67% | ||||
| John Hickman | 90% | ||||
| Dave Hogue | 80% | ||||
| Kory Holdaway | 80% | ||||
| Bradley Johnson | 89% | ||||
| Paula Julander | 67% | ||||
| Brad King | 40% | ||||
| David Litvack | 50% | ||||
| L. Alma Mansell | 100% | ||||
| Ed Mayne | 60% | ||||
| Ty McCartney | 50% | ||||
| Karen Morgan | 80% | ||||
| Carol Moss | 50% | ||||
| Joseph Murray | 90% | ||||
| Merlynn Newbold | 100% | ||||
| Loraine Pace | 100% | ||||
| Brent Parker | 78% | ||||
| Darin Peterson | 100% | ||||
| Millie Peterson | 60% | ||||
| Morgan Philpot | 100% | ||||
| L. Steven Poulton | 100% | ||||
| Carl Saunders | 90% | ||||
| Jack Seitz | 89% | ||||
| LaWanna Shurtliff | 50% | ||||
| Richard Siddoway | 80% | ||||
| Gordon Snow | 89% | ||||
| Terry Spencer | 89% | ||||
| David Steele | 70% | ||||
| Martin Stephens | 89% | ||||
| Michael Styler | 89% | ||||
| Alicia L Suazo | 33% | ||||
| Michael Thompson | 78% | ||||
| J. Matthew Throckmorton | 89% | ||||
| A. Lamont Tyler | 78% | ||||
| Michael Waddoups | 100% | ||||
| Carlene Walker | 90% | ||||
| Margaret Ann Wallace | 80% | ||||
| Glenn Way | 100% | ||||
| Bradley Winn | 100% | ||||
| Bill Wright | 89% | ||||
| Max Young | 67% |
Special Interest Groups
Rating Group: Utah National Federation of Independent Business
2001-2002 Positions
Issues:
Business and Consumers
How to Interpret these Evaluations
Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.
Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.
