Search Form
Now choose a category »

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Christian Coalition of America

1995-1996 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Edmond Spencer Abraham 92%
Gary Ackerman 0%
Daniel Akaka, Sr. 8%
Rob Andrews 30%
Bill Archer 93%
Richard Armey 100%
John Ashcroft 100%
Henry Scott Baesler 20%
Richard Hugh Baker 93%
William Baker 100%
Cass Ballenger 93%
James Barcia 46%
Bob Barr, Jr. 100%
Bill Barrett 93%
Roscoe Bartlett 100%
Charlie Bass 73%
Herbert Bateman 76%
Max Baucus 15%
Anthony Beilenson 0%
Bob Bennett 92%
Kenneth Bentsen, Jr. 7%
Douglas Bereuter 71%
Howard Berman 0%
Tom Bevill 71%
Brian Bilbray 66%
Michael Bilirakis 100%
Jeff Bingaman 0%
Thomas Bliley, Jr. 93%
Peter Blute 79%
Sherwood Boehlert 33%
Kit Bond 77%
Henry Bonilla 93%
David Edward Bonior 20%
Sonny Bono 92%
Robert Borski, Jr. 20%
Rick Boucher 7%
Bill Bradley 20%
John Breaux 46%
Bill Brewster 86%
George Brown, Jr. 0%
Hank Brown 100%
Richard Bryan 15%
Ed Bryant 100%
John Bryant 8%
Dale Bumpers 8%
Jim Bunn 91%
Jim Bunning 100%
Conrad Burns 100%
Dan Burton 100%
Steve Buyer 100%
Robert Byrd 30%
Herbert Callahan 100%
Ben Campbell 75%
Thomas Campbell 40%
FL Justice of the Supreme Court Charles Canady 86%
Mike Castle 66%
John Chafee 23%
Jim Chapman 50%
Helen Chenoweth-Hage 100%
Jon Lynn Christensen 93%
Dick Chrysler 100%
William Clay, Sr. 0%
Eva Clayton 7%
Robert Clement 33%
William Clinger 100%
William Cohen 50%
Ronald Coleman 7%
Barbara-Rose Collins 0%
Cardiss Collins 0%
Michael Collins 100%
Larry Combest 100%
Gary Condit 50%
Kent Conrad 15%
Wes Cooley 100%
Jerry Costello 40%
Paul Coverdell 100%
Christopher Cox 100%
William Coyne 0%
Larry Craig 100%
Robert Cramer 60%
Philip Crane 100%
Frank Arnold Cremeans 100%
Barbara Cubin 93%
Randall Cunningham 100%
Alfonse D'Amato 74%
Patsy Ann Danner 53%
Thomas Daschle 7%
Thomas Davis III 66%
E. Kika de la Garza 58%
Thomas DeLay 93%
Ronald Dellums 0%
Peter Deutsch 20%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 86%
Jay Dickey 100%
Norm Dicks 7%
Julian Dixon 0%
Chris Dodd 7%
Robert Dole 100%
Pete Domenici, Jr. 84%
Calvin Dooley 14%
John Doolittle 100%
Byron Dorgan 15%
Robert Dornan 100%
David Dreier 93%
Jennifer Dunn 84%
Chet Edwards 13%
Vern Ehlers 80%
Bob Ehrlich, Jr. 73%
Bill Emerson 100%
Philip English 100%
John Ensign 100%
Lane Evans 7%
Terry Everett 100%
Thomas Ewing 100%
Jim Exon 90%
Duncan McLauchlin Faircloth 100%
Harris Fawell 60%
Victor Fazio 7%
Russ Feingold 0%
Cleo Fields 0%
Jack Fields, Jr. 100%
Bob Filner 7%
Floyd Flake 13%
Michael Patrick Flanagan 82%
Thomas Foglietta 7%
Mark Foley 73%
Michael Patrick Forbes 93%
Wendell Ford 38%
Tillie Fowler 73%
Jon David Fox 86%
Barney Frank 0%
Gary Franks 93%
Robert Franks 66%
Dan Frisa 100%
William Frist 92%
Jonas Frost III 14%
David Funderburk 100%
Elizabeth Furse 13%
Elton Gallegly 100%
John Ganske 86%
Sam Gejdenson 0%
George Gekas 86%
Richard Andrew Gephardt 14%
Pete Geren 79%
Sam Gibbons 8%
Wayne Gilchrest 60%
Paul Gillmor 86%
Benjamin Gilman 53%
Newt Gingrich 91%
John Glenn 0%
Henry Gonzalez 7%
William Goodling 93%
Bart Gordon 40%
Slade Gorton 69%
Porter Goss 93%
Daniel Graham 15%
William Phillip Gramm 100%
Rodney Grams 100%
Enid Greene 100%
James Greenwood 57%
Judd Gregg 100%
Steven Gunderson 79%
Gilbert Gutknecht 100%
Tony Hall 23%
Lee Hamilton 26%
Melton Hancock 100%
James Hansen 93%
Jane Harman 21%
J. Dennis Hastert 100%
Mark Hatfield 50%
J.D. Hayworth, Jr. 100%
Joel Hefley 87%
W.G. Hefner 20%
Fredrick Kenneth Fred' Heineman 100%
Jesse Helms 100%
Wally Herger, Jr. 100%
Van Hilleary 100%
Earl Hilliard, Jr. 7%
Maurice Hinchey 0%
David Lee Hobson 80%
Pete Hoekstra 93%
Martin Hoke 92%
Thomas Holden 42%
Ernest Hollings 7%
Stephen Horn 53%
John Nathan Hostettler 80%
Amory Houghton, Jr. 53%
Duncan Hunter 93%
Kay Hutchison 100%
Henry Hyde 93%
Bob Inglis, Sr. 100%
Daniel Inouye 7%
Ernest Istook, Jr. 100%
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 0%
Andrew Jacobs, Jr. 50%
William Jefferson 14%
James Merrill Jeffords 30%
Nancy Johnson 40%
Harry Johnston 8%
J. Bennett Johnston 44%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top