Search Form
Now choose a category »

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: National Council of Senior Citizens

2000 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Gary Ackerman 100%
Daniel Akaka, Sr. 100%
Wayne Allard 0%
Thomas Allen 100%
Rob Andrews 90%
Richard Armey 0%
Joe Baca, Sr. 88%
Brian Baird 80%
Richard Hugh Baker 0%
Cass Ballenger 0%
James Barcia 60%
Bob Barr, Jr. 10%
Roscoe Bartlett 10%
Charlie Bass 10%
Max Baucus 100%
Evan Bayh 100%
Bob Bennett 0%
Kenneth Bentsen, Jr. 80%
Douglas Bereuter 0%
Shelley Berkley 80%
Howard Berman 100%
Marion Berry 80%
Judy Biggert 0%
Michael Bilirakis 10%
Jeff Bingaman 100%
Rod Blagojevich 90%
Sherwood Boehlert 20%
Kit Bond 0%
Henry Bonilla 0%
David Edward Bonior 100%
Mary Bono Mack 11%
Robert Borski, Jr. 100%
Leonard Boswell 63%
Rick Boucher 80%
Allen Boyd, Jr. 50%
John Breaux 60%
Ed Bryant 10%
Jim Bunning 0%
Conrad Burns 0%
Dan Burton 10%
Steve Buyer 0%
Robert Byrd 100%
Herbert Callahan 0%
Ben Campbell 0%
Chris Cannon 0%
Julia Carson 100%
Mike Castle 10%
Eva Clayton 90%
Joseph Maxwell Cleland 90%
Robert Clement 90%
Michael Collins 10%
Larry Combest 0%
Gary Condit 90%
Kent Conrad 89%
John Cooksey 0%
Jerry Costello 80%
Christopher Cox 0%
William Coyne 100%
Larry Craig 0%
Robert Cramer 70%
Philip Crane 0%
Barbara Cubin 10%
Randall Cunningham 0%
Thomas Daschle 100%
James Davis 90%
Thomas Davis III 10%
Bill Delahunt 90%
Thomas DeLay 0%
James DeMint 0%
Peter Deutsch 90%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 20%
Norm Dicks 90%
Chris Dodd 90%
Pete Domenici, Jr. 0%
Calvin Dooley 70%
John Doolittle 10%
Byron Dorgan 90%
David Dreier 0%
Jennifer Dunn 0%
John Edwards 100%
Chet Edwards 89%
Vern Ehlers 20%
Bob Ehrlich, Jr. 10%
Jo Ann Emerson 10%
Philip English 20%
Bob Etheridge 90%
Lane Evans 90%
Terry Everett 10%
Russ Feingold 100%
Bob Filner 100%
Peter Fitzgerald 30%
Ernest Fletcher 10%
Mark Foley 10%
Harold Ford, Jr. 90%
Vito Fossella, Jr. 10%
Barney Frank 100%
William Frist 0%
Jonas Frost III 100%
Elton Gallegly 10%
John Ganske 30%
George Gekas 10%
Richard Andrew Gephardt 100%
Jim Gibbons 10%
Wayne Gilchrest 20%
Paul Gillmor 0%
Benjamin Gilman 25%
Charlie Gonzalez 90%
Virgil Goode, Jr. 10%
Bart Gordon 90%
Porter Goss 10%
Daniel Graham 100%
William Phillip Gramm 0%
Mark Green 10%
James Greenwood 11%
Judd Gregg 10%
Gilbert Gutknecht 10%
Tony Hall 100%
James Hansen 0%
J. Dennis Hastert 25%
Robert Hayes 10%
J.D. Hayworth, Jr. 0%
Joel Hefley 10%
Jesse Helms 0%
Wally Herger, Jr. 10%
Baron Hill 70%
Van Hilleary 10%
Earl Hilliard, Jr. 100%
Maurice Hinchey 100%
David Lee Hobson 10%
PA Commissioner At-Large Joseph Hoeffel 100%
Pete Hoekstra 10%
Thomas Holden 80%
Ernest Hollings 90%
Darlene Hooley 90%
Stephen Horn 20%
John Nathan Hostettler 10%
Amory Houghton, Jr. 20%
Kenny Hulshof 0%
Duncan Hunter 10%
Asa Hutchinson 10%
Y. Tim Hutchinson 0%
Kay Hutchison 0%
Henry Hyde 20%
Daniel Inouye 100%
Ernest Istook, Jr. 11%
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 100%
William Jefferson 90%
James Merrill Jeffords 50%
William Lewis Jenkins 11%
Christopher John 70%
Nancy Johnson 10%
Paul Kanjorski 90%
Sue Kelly 0%
Edward Kennedy, Sr. 100%
Patrick Kennedy 100%
Dale Kildee 100%
Carolyn Kilpatrick 100%
Gerald Kleczka 100%
Joseph Knollenberg 0%
Herb Kohl 100%
James Kolbe 0%
Dennis Kucinich 100%
Jon Kyl 0%
John LaFalce 100%
Ray LaHood 20%
Nicholas Lampson 90%
Tom Lantos 90%
Stephen Largent 0%
Steve LaTourette 10%
James Leach 20%
Jerry Lewis 0%
Ron Lewis 10%
Joe Lieberman 90%
Blanche Lincoln 90%
John Linder 10%
William Lipinski 70%
Trent Lott, Sr. 0%
Dick Lugar 0%
William Luther 90%
James Maloney 50%
Don Manzullo 10%
Frank Mascara 90%
Robert Matsui 100%
Karen McCarthy 100%
James McCrery III 0%
John McHugh 22%
Scott McInnis 10%
Cynthia Ann McKinney 100%
Michael McNulty 89%
Martin Meehan 100%
Carrie Meek 90%
Juanita Millender-McDonald 100%
Dan Miller 10%
Patsy Takemoto Mink 80%
John Moakley 100%
Alan Mollohan 70%
Dennis Moore 50%
Constance Morella 30%
Frank Murkowski 0%
Jack Murtha 80%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top