Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Public Citizen's Congress Watch

2001-2002 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Neil Abercrombie 91%
Gary Ackerman 82%
Daniel Akaka, Sr. 80%
Todd Akin 5%
Wayne Allard 0%
George Allen 4%
Thomas Allen 86%
Rob Andrews 82%
Joe Baca, Sr. 77%
Spencer Bachus 5%
Brian Baird 77%
Richard Hugh Baker 5%
Cass Ballenger 5%
Roscoe Bartlett 14%
Charlie Bass 27%
Max Baucus 62%
Evan Bayh 65%
Bob Bennett 0%
Douglas Bereuter 14%
Shelley Berkley 82%
Howard Berman 95%
Marion Berry 82%
Judy Biggert 5%
Michael Bilirakis 9%
Jeff Bingaman 68%
Sherwood Boehlert 36%
Kit Bond 4%
Henry Bonilla 5%
Mary Bono Mack 14%
Leonard Boswell 73%
Rick Boucher 59%
Allen Boyd, Jr. 55%
John Breaux 31%
Henry Brown, Jr. 5%
Jim Bunning 0%
Conrad Burns 8%
Dan Burton 5%
Steve Buyer 9%
Robert Byrd 77%
Dave Camp 9%
Ben Campbell 19%
Chris Cannon 5%
Eric Cantor 5%
Brad Carson 55%
Julia Carson 86%
Mike Castle 32%
Linc Chafee 58%
Saxby Chambliss 9%
Hillary Clinton 96%
Howard Coble 18%
Michael Collins 14%
Larry Combest 9%
Kent Conrad 81%
Jon Corzine 96%
Jerry Costello 73%
Christopher Cox 5%
Larry Craig 0%
Robert Cramer 36%
Philip Crane 5%
Barbara Cubin 5%
Randall Cunningham 9%
Thomas Daschle 81%
James Davis 68%
Jo Ann Davis 14%
Thomas Davis III 9%
Bill Delahunt 77%
Thomas DeLay 5%
James DeMint 5%
Peter Deutsch 82%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 14%
Norm Dicks 68%
John Dingell 77%
Chris Dodd 92%
Pete Domenici, Jr. 12%
Calvin Dooley 41%
John Doolittle 14%
Byron Dorgan 81%
David Dreier 5%
Jennifer Dunn 5%
John Edwards 81%
Chet Edwards 64%
Vern Ehlers 14%
Jo Ann Emerson 18%
Philip English 9%
John Ensign 15%
Bob Etheridge 68%
Lane Evans 91%
Terry Everett 5%
Russ Feingold 88%
Michael Ferguson 23%
Bob Filner 91%
Peter Fitzgerald 36%
Ernest Fletcher 5%
Mark Foley 27%
Harold Ford, Jr. 73%
Vito Fossella, Jr. 9%
Barney Frank 95%
William Frist 4%
Jonas Frost III 82%
Elton Gallegly 14%
Richard Andrew Gephardt 86%
Jim Gibbons 9%
Wayne Gilchrest 18%
Paul Gillmor 5%
Charlie Gonzalez 68%
Virgil Goode, Jr. 18%
Bart Gordon 64%
Porter Goss 5%
Daniel Graham 69%
Mark Green 14%
James Greenwood 14%
Judd Gregg 12%
Gilbert Gutknecht 18%
Charles Hagel 12%
Ralph Hall 14%
Tom Harkin 92%
Jane Harman 73%
Melissa Hart 9%
J. Dennis Hastert 0%
Doc Hastings 5%
Robert Hayes 9%
J.D. Hayworth, Jr. 5%
Joel Hefley 9%
Wally Herger, Jr. 5%
Baron Hill 64%
Maurice Hinchey 91%
David Lee Hobson 5%
PA Commissioner At-Large Joseph Hoeffel 86%
Pete Hoekstra 18%
Thomas Holden 55%
Ernest Hollings 73%
Rush Holt, Jr. 86%
Darlene Hooley 82%
John Nathan Hostettler 14%
Amory Houghton, Jr. 27%
Kenny Hulshof 5%
Duncan Hunter 14%
Kay Hutchison 8%
Henry Hyde 9%
Daniel Inouye 88%
Ernest Istook, Jr. 14%
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 91%
William Jefferson 59%
James Merrill Jeffords 65%
William Lewis Jenkins 5%
Christopher John 45%
Nancy Johnson 27%
Tim Johnson 27%
Timothy Johnson 73%
Paul Kanjorski 82%
Ric Keller 5%
Sue Kelly 14%
Edward Kennedy, Sr. 92%
Mark Kennedy 5%
Patrick Kennedy 82%
Dale Kildee 91%
Carolyn Kilpatrick 86%
Jack Kingston 5%
Gerald Kleczka 86%
Joseph Knollenberg 5%
Herb Kohl 69%
James Kolbe 5%
Dennis Kucinich 91%
Jon Kyl 4%
Ray LaHood 14%
Nicholas Lampson 77%
Mary Landrieu 42%
Tom Lantos 91%
Tom Latham 5%
Steve LaTourette 18%
James Leach 50%
Carl Levin 77%
Jerry Lewis 14%
Ron Lewis 5%
Joe Lieberman 85%
Blanche Lincoln 42%
John Linder 5%
William Lipinski 59%
Trent Lott, Sr. 0%
Ken Lucas 23%
Dick Lugar 19%
Don Manzullo 14%
Jim Matheson 59%
Robert Matsui 86%
Carolyn McCarthy 82%
Karen McCarthy 86%
James McCrery III 5%
John McHugh 27%
Scott McInnis 5%
Mike McIntyre 64%
Buck McKeon 9%
Michael McNulty 91%
Martin Meehan 86%
Juanita Millender-McDonald 95%
Gary Miller 5%
George Miller 91%
Zell Bryan Miller 35%
Alan Mollohan 64%
Dennis Moore 68%
Jim Moran, Jr. 59%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top