Search Form
Now choose a category »

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: American Veterans

2003 Positions

Issues: Veterans
State Office District Name Party Rating
Gary Ackerman 0%
Todd Akin 100%
Rodney Alexander 100%
Thomas Allen 50%
Rob Andrews 50%
Joe Baca, Sr. 50%
Brian Baird 100%
Richard Hugh Baker 50%
Frank Ballance, Jr. 0%
Cass Ballenger 50%
J. Gresham Barrett 100%
Roscoe Bartlett 100%
Charlie Bass 50%
Bob Beauprez 100%
Chris Bell 50%
Douglas Bereuter 50%
Shelley Berkley 50%
Howard Berman 0%
Marion Berry 50%
Judy Biggert 50%
Michael Bilirakis 100%
Sherwood Boehlert 50%
Henry Bonilla 50%
Jo Bonner, Jr. 50%
Mary Bono Mack 50%
Leonard Boswell 100%
Rick Boucher 0%
Allen Boyd, Jr. 50%
Henry Brown, Jr. 50%
Ginny Brown-Waite 100%
Max Burns 100%
Dan Burton 50%
Steve Buyer 50%
Chris Cannon 50%
Eric Cantor 50%
Dennis Cardoza 50%
Brad Carson 50%
Julia Carson 50%
Edward Case 50%
Mike Castle 50%
Chris Chocola 100%
Michael Collins 50%
Jerry Costello 100%
Christopher Cox 50%
Robert Cramer 50%
Philip Crane 50%
Barbara Cubin 50%
Randall Cunningham 50%
Artur Davis 0%
James Davis 50%
Jo Ann Davis 100%
Lincoln Davis 100%
Thomas Davis III 50%
Bill Delahunt 100%
Thomas DeLay 50%
James DeMint 50%
Peter Deutsch 50%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 50%
Norm Dicks 0%
Calvin Dooley 50%
John Doolittle 50%
David Dreier 0%
Jennifer Dunn 50%
Chet Edwards 50%
Vern Ehlers 0%
Jo Ann Emerson 50%
Philip English 100%
Bob Etheridge 50%
Lane Evans 50%
Terry Everett 50%
Tom Feeney 100%
Michael Ferguson 50%
Bob Filner 50%
Mark Foley 50%
Harold Ford, Jr. 50%
Vito Fossella, Jr. 50%
Barney Frank 0%
Jonas Frost III 50%
Elton Gallegly 50%
Richard Andrew Gephardt 0%
Jim Gibbons 50%
Wayne Gilchrest 0%
Paul Gillmor 50%
Charlie Gonzalez 0%
Virgil Goode, Jr. 50%
Bart Gordon 50%
Porter Goss 50%
Mark Green 100%
James Greenwood 0%
Gilbert Gutknecht 100%
Jane Harman 50%
Katherine Harris 50%
Melissa Hart 100%
J. Dennis Hastert 0%
Robert Hayes 50%
J.D. Hayworth, Jr. 100%
Joel Hefley 100%
Wally Herger, Jr. 0%
Baron Hill 50%
Maurice Hinchey 0%
David Lee Hobson 50%
PA Commissioner At-Large Joseph Hoeffel 0%
Pete Hoekstra 0%
Thomas Holden 50%
Darlene Hooley 50%
John Nathan Hostettler 100%
Amory Houghton, Jr. 50%
Kenny Hulshof 50%
Duncan Hunter 50%
Henry Hyde 100%
Ernest Istook, Jr. 50%
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 50%
William Jefferson 50%
William Lewis Jenkins 50%
Christopher John 100%
Nancy Johnson 100%
Tim Johnson 100%
Paul Kanjorski 50%
Ric Keller 50%
Sue Kelly 50%
Mark Kennedy 50%
Patrick Kennedy 0%
Dale Kildee 50%
Carolyn Kilpatrick 0%
Gerald Kleczka 0%
Joseph Knollenberg 50%
James Kolbe 50%
Dennis Kucinich 100%
Ray LaHood 50%
Nicholas Lampson 50%
Tom Lantos 50%
Steve LaTourette 50%
James Leach 0%
Jerry Lewis 50%
Ron Lewis 100%
John Linder 50%
William Lipinski 50%
Denise Majette 0%
Don Manzullo 50%
Jim Marshall 50%
Robert Matsui 0%
Karen McCarthy 0%
Thaddeus McCotter 100%
James McCrery III 50%
John McHugh 50%
Scott McInnis 100%
Michael McNulty 50%
Martin Meehan 0%
Kendrick Meek, Sr. 50%
Juanita Millender-McDonald 50%
Brad Miller 0%
Alan Mollohan 50%
Dennis Moore 0%
Jack Murtha 50%
Marilyn Musgrave 100%
Sue Myrick 50%
George Nethercutt, Jr. 50%
Robert William Ney 50%
Anne Northup 50%
Charles Norwood, Jr. 50%
James Nussle 100%
Jim Oberstar 0%
Dave Obey 50%
John Olver 0%
Solomon Ortiz, Sr. 50%
Thomas William Osborne 50%
Doug Ose 50%
Major Owens 0%
Michael Oxley 50%
Ron Paul 50%
Donald Payne 0%
John Peterson 50%
Charles Pickering, Jr. 50%
Todd Platts 50%
Richard Pombo 50%
Earl Pomeroy 100%
Jon Porter, Sr. 50%
Deborah Pryce 50%
Jack Quinn 50%
George Radanovich 50%
James Ramstad 100%
Ralph Regula 50%
Denny Rehberg 50%
Richard Renzi 100%
Silvestre Reyes 50%
Thomas Reynolds 50%
Ciro Rodriguez 100%
Mike Ross 50%
Steve Rothman 50%
Jim Ryun 100%
Martin Olav Sabo 0%
Max Sandlin, Jr. 50%
Jim Saxton 50%
Edward Schrock 100%
John Shadegg 0%
E. Clay Shaw, Jr. 50%
Christopher Shays 0%
Donald Sherwood 50%
Robert Ruhl Simmons 100%
Ike Skelton 50%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top