| State | Office | District | Name | Party | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bob Bacon | 100% | ||||
| Alice Borodkin | 100% | ||||
| Betty Boyd | 100% | ||||
| Joan Fitz-Gerald | 100% | ||||
| Michael Garcia | 100% | ||||
| Kenneth Marshall Gordon | 100% | ||||
| Peter Groff | 100% | ||||
| Daniel Grossman | 100% | ||||
| Bob Hagedorn | 100% | ||||
| CO | State Senate | 25 | Mary Hodge | Democratic | 100% |
| James Isgar | 100% | ||||
| CO | State Senate | 20 | Cheri Jahn | Democratic | 100% |
| Alice Madden | 100% | ||||
| Tom Plant | 100% | ||||
| Ann Ragsdale | 100% | ||||
| Andrew Romanoff | 100% | ||||
| Stephanie Takis | 100% | ||||
| Abel Tapia | 100% | ||||
| CO | State Senate | 24 | Lois Tochtrop | Democratic | 100% |
| Ron Tupa | 100% | ||||
| Jennifer Veiga | 100% | ||||
| Valentin Vigil | 100% | ||||
| Suzanne Williams | 100% | ||||
| Sue Windels | 100% | ||||
| Rosemary Marshall | 91% | ||||
| Fran Coleman | 74% | ||||
| Mark Larson | 52% | ||||
| Lewis Entz | 41% | ||||
| F. Jim Dyer | 34% | ||||
| Mark Alan Cloer | 33% | ||||
| David Schultheis | 29% | ||||
| Albert White | 23% | ||||
| John Evans | 17% | ||||
| Bill Crane | 13% | ||||
| Richard Decker | 11% | ||||
| Lynn Christian Hefley | 11% | ||||
| Diane Hoppe | 11% | ||||
| CO | Commissioner | 2 | Steve Johnson | 11% | |
| Shawn Mitchell | 11% | ||||
| Nancy Spence | 11% | ||||
| CO | State Senate | 12 | Bill Cadman | Republican | 10% |
| Joseph Stengel, Jr. | 10% | ||||
| Keith King | 9% | ||||
| Lauri Clapp | 8% | ||||
| Debbie Stafford | 8% | ||||
| Kenneth Kester | 6% | ||||
| Jack Taylor | 5% | ||||
| CO | State Senate | 30 | Ted Harvey | Republican | 4% |
| Ronny May | 4% | ||||
| David Owen | 4% | ||||
| Ronald Teck | 4% | ||||
| CO | U.S. House | 5 | Doug Lamborn | Republican | 3% |
| Andrew McElhany | 3% |
Issues:
Labor Unions
How to Interpret these Evaluations
Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.
Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.
