Rating Group: Colorado AFL-CIO

2003-2004 Positions

Issues: Labor Unions
State Office Name Party Rating
CO U.S. House-5 Doug Lamborn R 0%
CO State Senate-1 Greg Brophy R 0%
CO State Senate-12 Bill Cadman R 0%
CO State Senate-15 Kevin Lundberg R 0%
CO State Senate-20 Cheri Jahn D 59%
CO State Senate-25 Mary Hodge D 100%
CO State Senate-30 Ted Harvey R 0%
CO Council Member-At-Large Susan Shepherd D 50%
CO Council Member Susan Shepherd Other 50%
CO Commissioner-2 Steve Johnson Other 0%
Norma Anderson Other 36%
Alice Borodkin Other 68%
Betty Boyd Other 100%
Dorothy Butcher Other 96%
Terrance Carroll Other 62%
Michael Cerbo Other 100%
Lauri Clapp Other 0%
Mark Alan Cloer Other 30%
Fran Coleman Other 61%
Bill Crane Other 0%
Richard Decker Other 61%
F. Jim Dyer Other 33%
Lewis Entz Other 43%
John Evans Other 0%
Joan Fitz-Gerald Other 100%
K. Jerry Frangas Other 100%
Michael Garcia Other 57%
Kenneth Marshall Gordon Other 82%
Peter Groff Other 82%
Daniel Grossman Other 64%
Bob Hagedorn Other 77%
Dale Hall Other 2%
Deanna Hanna Other 100%
Lynn Christian Hefley Other 2%
Mark Hillman Other 0%
Diane Hoppe Other 12%
James Isgar Other 83%
Ed Jones Other 0%
Joel Judd Other 77%
Maryanne Keller Other 100%
Kenneth Kester Other 32%
Keith King Other 0%
Mark Larson Other 13%
Alice Madden Other 100%
Rosemary Marshall Other 60%
Michael May Other 2%
Ronny May Other 0%
Bob McCluskey, Jr. Other 17%
Andrew McElhany Other 0%
Liane McFadyen Other 100%
Anne McGihon Other 100%
Michael Merrifield Other 100%
David Owen Other 0%
Angie Paccione Other 66%
Tom Plant Other 100%
John Pommer Other 92%
Ann Ragsdale Other 99%
Andrew Romanoff Other 66%
Raymond Rose Other 18%
David Schultheis Other 0%
Debbie Stafford Other 0%
Joseph Stengel, Jr. Other 0%
Stephanie Takis Other 81%
Abel Tapia Other 100%
Jack Taylor Other 0%
Ronald Teck Other 0%
Ron Tupa Other 82%
Jennifer Veiga Other 58%
Valentin Vigil Other 67%
Paul Weissmann Other 100%
James Welker Other 0%
Albert White Other 0%
Sue Windels Other 82%
John Witwer Other 2%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.