Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Ohio Sierra Club

2001-2002 Positions

Issues: Environment
State Office District Name Party Rating
OH U.S. House 3 Joyce Beatty Democratic 86%
OH U.S. House 4 Jim Jordan Republican 30%
OH U.S. House 5 Bob Latta Republican 29%
OH U.S. House 13 Tim Ryan Democratic 80%
OH State House 24 James Hughes Republican 29%
OH State House 27 Tom Brinkman, Jr. Republican 43%
OH State House 30 William Seitz Republican 29%
OH State House 39 Fred Strahorn Democratic 71%
OH State House 45 Teresa Fedor Democratic 71%
OH State House 48 Kirk Schuring Republican 29%
OH State House 59 John Boccieri Democratic 71%
OH State House 61 Ronald Young Republican 29%
OH State House 72 Larry Householder Republican 29%
OH State House 77 Tim Schaffer Republican 29%
OH State House 84 Keith Faber Republican 29%
OH State Senate 2 Randall Gardner Republican 50%
OH State Senate 11 Edna Brown Democratic 50%
OH State Senate 29 W. Scott Oelslager Republican 60%
OH State Senate 31 Jay Hottinger Republican 50%
OH Secretary of State Jon Husted Republican 29%
OH Council Member 2 Dale Miller 86%
OH Council Member 3 Dan Brady 70%
OH Council Member At-Large Joseph Koziura 50%
OH Council Member At-Large Daniel Sferra 57%
OH Commissioner At-Large Thom Collier 29%
OH Commissioner At-Large Anthony Core 29%
OH Township Committee Member At-Large Kenneth Carano, Sr. Democratic 57%
OH State Board of Public Education Nancy Hollister 29%
Dixie Allen 57%
Ron Amstutz 50%
Jeffry Armbruster 50%
James Aslanides 29%
Steve Austria 50%
Catherine Barrett 71%
Charles Blasdel II 29%
Louis Blessing, Jr. 50%
Samuel Britton 71%
Stephen Buehrer 29%
James Callender 14%
Charles Calvert 29%
John Carey, Jr. 29%
James Carmichael 29%
Jim Carnes 50%
Gary Cates 29%
Mary Cirelli 71%
Patricia Clancy 29%
Wayne Coates 57%
Kevin Coughlin 50%
Rex Damschroder 29%
Michael DeBose 75%
Dean DePiero 57%
Kevin DeWine 29%
Gregory DiDonato 80%
L. George Distel 57%
Steve Driehaus 57%
Ben Espy 70%
David Evans 29%
Diana Fessler 14%
Richard Finan 50%
Eric Fingerhut 90%
Bryan Flannery 57%
Larry Flowers 29%
Linda Furney 80%
Robert Gardner 50%
Michael Gilb 29%
David Goodman 63%
Timothy Grendell 33%
John Hagan 29%
Robert Hagan 80%
Bill Harris 50%
William Hartnett 57%
Leigh Herington 70%
James Hoops 29%
Jeff Jacobson 50%
Ed Jerse 57%
Gregory Jolivette 29%
Merle Grace Kearns 29%
Annie Key 71%
Sally Conway Kilbane 29%
K. Eileen Krupinski 57%
Anthony Latell, Jr. 57%
John Lendrum 29%
Mark Mallory 70%
Jeffrey Manning 29%
Lance Mason 50%
Jim McGregor 40%
Priscilla Mead 50%
Kerry Robert Metzger 29%
I. Miller, Jr. 71%
Larry Mumper 50%
Scott Nein 40%
Thomas Niehaus 29%
Mary Rose Oakar 71%
William Ogg 57%
Lynn Olman 29%
Robert Otterman 57%
Sylvester Patton, Jr. 57%
Jeanine Perry 71%
Jon Peterson 29%
C.J. Prentiss 70%
Tom Raga 29%
Chris Redfern 57%
Linda Reidelbach 29%
Steve Reinhard 29%
Ronald Rhine 71%
Thomas Roberts 83%
Twyla Roman 29%
Amy Salerno 29%
Jean Schmidt 29%
Michelle Schneider 29%
Derrick Seaver 43%
Arlene Setzer 29%
Michael Shoemaker 60%
Geoffrey Smith 29%
Shirley Smith 71%
Robert Spada 50%
Dennis Stapleton 29%
Erin Sullivan 29%
Joe Sulzer, Sr. 57%
Barbara Ann Sykes 71%
James Trakas 29%
Lynn Wachtmann 30%
Shawn Webster 29%
Doug White 50%
John White 29%
John Widowfield 29%
John Willamowski 29%
Bryan Williams 29%
Charlie Wilson, Jr. 57%
Larry Wolpert 29%
Ann Womer-Benjamin 29%
Claudette Woodard 57%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top