Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Maryland State Education Association - NEA

2005 Positions

Issues: Education
State Office District Name Party Rating
MD U.S. House 1 Andy Harris Republican 60%
MD State House 7 Patrick McDonough Republican 0%
MD State House 8 Eric Bromwell Democratic 50%
MD State House 10 Adrienne Jones Democratic 67%
MD State House 11 Dan Morhaim Democratic 100%
MD State House 13 Shane Pendergrass Democratic 100%
MD State House 13 Frank Turner Democratic 67%
MD State House 14 Anne Kaiser Democratic 67%
MD State House 22 Tawanna Gaines Democratic 67%
MD State House 22 Anne Healey Democratic 57%
MD State House 24 Carolyn Howard Democratic 67%
MD State House 27A James Proctor, Jr. Democratic 100%
MD State House 29C Anthony O'Donnell, Sr. Republican 33%
MD State House 39 Charles Barkley Democratic 67%
MD State House 41 Nathaniel Oaks Democratic 100%
MD State House 42B Susan Aumann Republican 67%
MD State House 44A Keith Haynes Democratic 67%
MD State House 45 Talmadge Branch Democratic 67%
MD State House 46 Peter Hammen Democratic 100%
MD State Senate 1 George Edwards Republican 67%
MD State Senate 8 Katherine Ann Klausmeier Democratic 100%
MD State Senate 9 Gail Bates Republican 33%
MD State Senate 10 Delores Kelley Democratic 100%
MD State Senate 12 Edward Kasemeyer Democratic 75%
MD State Senate 18 Richard Madaleno, Jr. Democratic 67%
MD State Senate 22 Paul Pinsky Democratic 80%
MD State Senate 24 Joanne Benson Democratic 100%
MD State Senate 25 Ulysses Currie Democratic 75%
MD State Senate 28 Thomas Middleton Democratic 100%
MD State Senate 30 John Astle Democratic 100%
MD State Senate 32 James DeGrange, Sr. Democratic 75%
MD State Senate 37 Addie Eckardt Republican 33%
MD State Senate 39 Nancy King Democratic 57%
MD State Senate 41 Lisa Gladden Democratic 100%
MD State Senate 42 James Brochin Democratic 80%
MD State Senate 43 Joan Carter Conway Democratic 80%
MD State Senate 44 Shirley Nathan-Pulliam Democratic 100%
MD State Senate 45 Nathaniel McFadden Democratic 75%
MD State Senate 47 Victor Ramirez Democratic 57%
MD Comptroller Peter Franchot Democratic 100%
MD Council Member 8 Obie Patterson Democratic 57%
Joseph Bartlett 43%
John Bohanan, Jr. 67%
David Boschert 43%
Joseph Boteler III 50%
Charles Boutin 50%
Bennett Bozman 57%
David Brinkley 75%
Gwendolyn Britt 80%
Joan Cadden 67%
Jon Cardin 57%
Galen Clagett 67%
Richard Colburn 60%
Norman Conway 67%
Bob Costa 50%
Clarence Davis 80%
Steven DeBoy, Sr. 67%
George Della, Jr. 100%
John Donoghue 50%
Roy Dyson 67%
Donald Elliott 50%
D. Page Elmore 67%
Nathaniel Exum 100%
William Frank 50%
Terry Gilleland, Jr. 57%
Marshall Toby Goodwin 67%
Michael Gordon 75%
Janet Hines Greenip 80%
Melony Griffith 67%
Sharon Grosfeld 60%
John Hafer 100%
Henry Heller 50%
Patrick John Hogan 75%
Paula Colodny Hollinger 80%
J. Robert Hooper 100%
James Hubbard 100%
Mary-Dulany James 67%
Verna Jones-Rodwell 100%
Wade Kach 50%
Allan Kittleman 80%
Rona Kramer 75%
P. Sue Kullen 100%
Gloria Gary Lawlah 0%
John Leopold 67%
Murray Levy 67%
Adrienne Mandel 100%
Salima Siler Marriott 57%
Robert McKee 29%
Donald Munson 75%
Gareth Murray 100%
LeRoy Ellsworth Myers, Jr. 60%
Doyle Niemann 100%
Jeffrey Paige 100%
Edward Pipkin 100%
Justin Ross 57%
Ida Ruben 75%
David Rudolph 100%
Sandra Schrader 75%
Nancy Stocksdale 33%
J. Lowell Stoltzfus 75%
Leonard Teitelbaum 100%
Veronica Turner 100%
Richard Weldon, Jr. 50%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top