| State | Office | District | Name | Party | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SD | Lieutenant Governor | Matt Michels | Republican | 80% | |
| SD | State House | 2 | Brock Greenfield | Republican | 100% |
| SD | State House | 4 | James Peterson | Democratic | 100% |
| SD | State House | 12 | Hal Wick | Republican | 80% |
| SD | State House | 21 | Julie Bartling | Democratic | 100% |
| SD | State House | 24 | Tim Rounds | Republican | 100% |
| SD | State Senate | 3 | Al Novstrup | Republican | 100% |
| SD | State Senate | 7 | Larry Tidemann | Republican | 100% |
| SD | State Senate | 9 | Deb Peters | Republican | 100% |
| SD | State Senate | 10 | Shantel Krebs | Republican | 100% |
| SD | State Senate | 13 | Phyllis Heineman | Republican | 80% |
| SD | State Senate | 18 | Jean Hunhoff | Republican | 100% |
| SD | State Senate | 20 | Mike Vehle | Republican | 100% |
| SD | State Senate | 25 | Tim Rave | Republican | 100% |
| SD | State Senate | 27 | James Bradford | Democratic | 80% |
| SD | State Senate | 29 | Larry Rhoden | Republican | 100% |
| SD | State Senate | 32 | Stanford Adelstein | Republican | 80% |
| SD | Secretary of State | Jason Gant | Republican | 100% | |
| SD | Commissioner | At-Large | Burt Elliott | No Party Affiliation | 100% |
| SD | Commissioner | At-Large | Dick Kelly | No Party Affiliation | 80% |
| SD | Commissioner | At-Large | James Lintz | No Party Affiliation | 100% |
| SD | Commissioner | At-Large | Garry Allen Moore | No Party Affiliation | 80% |
| SD | Commissioner | At-Large | Duane Sutton | No Party Affiliation | 100% |
| Gene Abdallah | 70% | ||||
| Jerry Apa | 100% | ||||
| Eric Bogue | 100% | ||||
| Jamie Boomgarden | 100% | ||||
| Bernard Michael Broderick, Jr. | 80% | ||||
| Thomas Brunner | 100% | ||||
| Michael Buckingham | 80% | ||||
| Joni Cutler | 100% | ||||
| Justin Davis | 100% | ||||
| Thomas Deadrick | 100% | ||||
| Thomas Dempster | 80% | ||||
| H. Dennert | 100% | ||||
| Jay Duenwald | 100% | ||||
| J.P. Duniphan | 80% | ||||
| Joel Dykstra | 100% | ||||
| William Earley | 80% | ||||
| Bob Faehn | 80% | ||||
| Larry Frost | 80% | ||||
| Arthur Fryslie | 90% | ||||
| Cooper Garnos | 100% | ||||
| David Gassman | 60% | ||||
| Margaret Gillespie | 80% | ||||
| Mary Glenski | 80% | ||||
| Thomas Glover | 80% | ||||
| Bob Gray | 80% | ||||
| Tom Hackl | 100% | ||||
| Patrick Haley | 80% | ||||
| Clayton Halverson | 100% | ||||
| Alan Hanks | 100% | ||||
| Tom Hansen | 100% | ||||
| Gary Hanson | 100% | ||||
| Dale Hargens | 100% | ||||
| Jeffrey Haverly | 100% | ||||
| Thomas Hennies | 80% | ||||
| Thomas Hills | 100% | ||||
| Gordon Howie | 100% | ||||
| James Hundstad | 100% | ||||
| Roger Hunt | 60% | ||||
| Barry Jensen | 100% | ||||
| Gary Jerke | 100% | ||||
| Ted Klaudt | 100% | ||||
| Frank Kloucek | 80% | ||||
| David Knudson | 80% | ||||
| Gilbert Koetzle | 90% | ||||
| Al Koistinen | 100% | ||||
| Clarence Kooistra | 60% | ||||
| John Koskan | 100% | ||||
| Elizabeth Kraus | 100% | ||||
| Michael Kroger | 80% | ||||
| Gerald Lange | 80% | ||||
| Alice Lucille McCoy | 80% | ||||
| Royal McCracken | 80% | ||||
| Ed McLaughlin | 100% | ||||
| Kenneth McNenny | 100% | ||||
| Kathleen Miles | 100% | ||||
| Casey Murschel | 100% | ||||
| William Napoli | 100% | ||||
| Paul Nelson | 100% | ||||
| Benjamin Nesselhuf | 100% | ||||
| Sean O'Brien | 100% | ||||
| Edwin Olson, Jr. | 100% | ||||
| Ryan Olson | 100% | ||||
| Gordon Pederson | 100% | ||||
| J.E. Putnam | 70% | ||||
| Valentine Rausch | 100% | ||||
| Elaine Roberts | 100% | ||||
| Donna Schafer | 100% | ||||
| Lee Anton Schoenbeck | 100% | ||||
| Louis Sebert | 80% | ||||
| David Sigdestad | 100% | ||||
| Orville Smidt | 100% | ||||
| Steve Street | 100% | ||||
| Daniel Sutton | 100% | ||||
| William Thompson | 100% | ||||
| R. Shawn Tornow | 70% | ||||
| Charles Turbiville | 100% | ||||
| Theresa Two Bulls | 100% | ||||
| Paul Valandra | 100% | ||||
| Donald Van Etten | 100% | ||||
| Thomas Van Norman | 100% | ||||
| Keri Weems | 100% | ||||
| Mark Willadsen | 80% |
How to Interpret these Evaluations
Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.
Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.