| State | Office | District | Name | Party | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NE | U.S. House | 3 | Adrian Smith | Republican | 100% |
| NE | State Senate | 11 | Ernie Chambers | Non-partisan | 0% |
| NE | Attorney General | Jon Bruning | Republican | 100% | |
| NE | Director of the Department of Veterans' Affairs | John Hilgert | No Party Affiliation | 67% | |
| NE | Mayor | At-Large | Chris Beutler | 33% | |
| NE | Supervisor | 4 | Dennis Byars | Non-partisan | 86% |
| NE | Council Member | Ward 5 | Donald Preister | Non-partisan | 60% |
| NE | Council Member | At-Large | DiAnna Schimek | Non-partisan | 63% |
| Thomas Baker | 88% | ||||
| Ardyce Bohlke | 86% | ||||
| Patrick Bourne | 71% | ||||
| Curt Bromm | 75% | ||||
| Pamela Brown | 100% | ||||
| Matt Connealy | 57% | ||||
| George Coordsen | 67% | ||||
| LaVon Crosby | 100% | ||||
| Jim Cudaback | 100% | ||||
| Cap Dierks | 100% | ||||
| L. Patrick Engel | 86% | ||||
| D. Paul Hartnett | 83% | ||||
| Carol Hudkins | 86% | ||||
| Ray Janssen | 50% | ||||
| Jim Jensen | 71% | ||||
| James Jones | 100% | ||||
| Shelley Kiel | 50% | ||||
| Robert Kremer | 88% | ||||
| Douglas Kristensen | 80% | ||||
| David Landis | 86% | ||||
| Daniel Lynch | 60% | ||||
| Gerald Matzke | 83% | ||||
| Dwite Pedersen | 86% | ||||
| Donald Pederson | 75% | ||||
| Marian Price | 75% | ||||
| Mark Quandahl | 100% | ||||
| Ronald Raikes | 63% | ||||
| Pamela Redfield | 86% | ||||
| Jerry Schmitt | 71% | ||||
| Ed Schrock | 71% | ||||
| Elaine Ruth Stuhr | 88% | ||||
| Deborah Suttle | 43% | ||||
| Nancy Thompson | 50% | ||||
| Eugene Tyson | 100% | ||||
| Floyd Vrtiska | 80% | ||||
| Roger Ralph Wehrbein | 71% | ||||
| William Wickersham | 50% |
Special Interest Groups
Rating Group: Nebraska National Federation of Independent Business
1999-2000 Positions
Issues:
Business and Consumers
How to Interpret these Evaluations
Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.
Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.
