Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Campaign for America's Future

2005-2006 Energy Score

State Office District Name Party Rating
Neil Abercrombie 100%
Gary Ackerman 100%
Daniel Akaka, Sr. 100%
Todd Akin 0%
Rodney Alexander 0%
Wayne Allard 17%
George Allen 0%
Thomas Allen 100%
Rob Andrews 67%
Joe Baca, Sr. 83%
Spencer Bachus 0%
Brian Baird 100%
Richard Hugh Baker 0%
J. Gresham Barrett 0%
John Barrow 100%
Roscoe Bartlett 33%
Charlie Bass 33%
Max Baucus 50%
Evan Bayh 100%
Melissa Bean 100%
Bob Beauprez 0%
Bob Bennett 17%
Shelley Berkley 100%
Howard Berman 100%
Marion Berry 67%
Judy Biggert 0%
Michael Bilirakis 0%
Jeff Bingaman 50%
Tim Bishop 100%
Sherwood Boehlert 50%
Kit Bond 17%
Henry Bonilla 0%
Jo Bonner, Jr. 0%
Mary Bono Mack 17%
Dan Boren 50%
Leonard Boswell 33%
Rick Boucher 50%
Allen Boyd, Jr. 50%
Henry Brown, Jr. 0%
Ginny Brown-Waite 17%
Jim Bunning 0%
Conrad Burns 0%
Dan Burton 0%
Steve Buyer 0%
Robert Byrd 83%
Dave Camp 0%
Chris Cannon 0%
Eric Cantor 0%
Dennis Cardoza 67%
Russ Carnahan 100%
Julia Carson 83%
Edward Case 100%
Mike Castle 33%
Lincoln Chafee 67%
Saxby Chambliss 17%
Ben Chandler III 83%
Chris Chocola 0%
Hillary Clinton 100%
Howard Coble 0%
Thomas Coburn 17%
Norm Coleman 50%
Kent Conrad 50%
Jerry Costello 83%
Larry Craig 17%
Robert Cramer 50%
Barbara Cubin 0%
Artur Davis 100%
Geoff Davis 0%
James Davis 67%
Jo Ann Davis 0%
Lincoln Davis 67%
Thomas Davis III 17%
Bill Delahunt 83%
Thomas DeLay 0%
James DeMint 17%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 0%
Norm Dicks 100%
John Dingell 83%
Chris Dodd 100%
Elizabeth Dole 17%
Pete Domenici, Jr. 0%
John Doolittle 0%
Byron Dorgan 67%
Thelma Drake 0%
David Dreier 0%
Chet Edwards 50%
Vern Ehlers 33%
Jo Ann Emerson 17%
Philip English 17%
John Ensign 17%
Bob Etheridge 100%
Lane Evans 100%
Terry Everett 0%
Tom Feeney 0%
Russ Feingold 100%
Michael Ferguson 33%
Bob Filner 100%
Mark Foley 0%
Harold Ford, Jr. 100%
Vito Fossella, Jr. 17%
Barney Frank 100%
William Frist 0%
Elton Gallegly 0%
Jim Gerlach 33%
Jim Gibbons 0%
Wayne Gilchrest 33%
Paul Gillmor 0%
Phil Gingrey 0%
Charlie Gonzalez 50%
Virgil Goode, Jr. 0%
Bart Gordon 67%
Mark Green 17%
Judd Gregg 17%
Gilbert Gutknecht 0%
Charles Hagel 17%
Ralph Hall 0%
Tom Harkin 100%
Jane Harman 83%
Katherine Harris 17%
Melissa Hart 0%
J. Dennis Hastert 0%
Doc Hastings 0%
Robert Hayes 0%
J.D. Hayworth, Jr. 0%
Joel Hefley 0%
Wally Herger, Jr. 0%
Stephanie Herseth Sandlin 83%
Maurice Hinchey 100%
David Lee Hobson 0%
Pete Hoekstra 17%
Thomas Holden 83%
Rush Holt, Jr. 100%
Darlene Hooley 100%
John Nathan Hostettler 0%
Kenny Hulshof 0%
Duncan Hunter 0%
Kay Hutchison 33%
Henry Hyde 0%
Bob Inglis, Sr. 17%
Daniel Inouye 100%
Ernest Istook, Jr. 0%
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 100%
William Jefferson 67%
James Merrill Jeffords 83%
William Lewis Jenkins 0%
Nancy Johnson 33%
Tim Johnson 33%
Timothy Johnson 100%
Paul Kanjorski 83%
Ric Keller 0%
Sue Kelly 0%
Edward Kennedy, Sr. 100%
Mark Kennedy 17%
Patrick Kennedy 100%
Dale Kildee 83%
Carolyn Kilpatrick 100%
Jack Kingston 0%
Joseph Knollenberg 0%
Herb Kohl 100%
James Kolbe 0%
Dennis Kucinich 100%
John Kuhl, Jr. 0%
Jon Kyl 0%
Ray LaHood 33%
Mary Landrieu 33%
Tom Lantos 100%
Tom Latham 0%
Steve LaTourette 33%
Frank Lautenberg 100%
James Leach 33%
Carl Levin 83%
Jerry Lewis 0%
Ron Lewis 0%
Joe Lieberman 100%
Blanche Lincoln 67%
John Linder 0%
Trent Lott, Sr. 0%
Dick Lugar 0%
Dan Lungren 0%
Connie Mack IV 0%
Don Manzullo 0%
Jim Marshall 50%
Melquiades Martinez 0%
Jim Matheson 50%
Carolyn McCarthy 100%
Thaddeus McCotter 17%
James McCrery III 0%
John McHugh 17%
Mike McIntyre 83%
Buck McKeon 0%
Cynthia Ann McKinney 100%
Michael McNulty 100%
Martin Meehan 100%
Kendrick Meek, Sr. 83%
Charlie Melancon, Sr. 33%
Mike Michaud 100%
Juanita Millender-McDonald 100%
Gary Miller 0%
George Miller 100%
Brad Miller 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top