or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Louisiana Christian Coalition

1996-1997 Positions

Issues: Social , Conservative
State Office District Name Party Rating
LA U.S. Senate Jr David Vitter Republican 90%
LA U.S. House 1 Steve Scalise Republican 80%
LA Lieutenant Governor Jay Dardenne, Jr. Republican 66%
LA State Senate 3 Jean-Paul Morrell Democratic 20%
LA State Senate 4 Edwin Murray Democratic 30%
LA State Senate 8 John Alario, Jr. Republican 40%
LA State Senate 10 Daniel Martiny Republican 40%
LA State Senate 27 Ronnie Johns Republican 50%
LA State Senate 30 John Smith Republican 70%
LA State Senate 33 Michael Walsworth Republican 70%
LA State Senate 34 Francis Thompson Democratic 70%
LA State Senate 39 Gregory Williams Tarver, Sr. Democratic 33%
LA Secretary of State Tom Schedler, Jr. Republican 66%
LA Insurance Commissioner James Donelon Republican 80%
LA Mayor At-Large Mitch Landrieu Democratic 60%
LA Public Service Commissioner Foster Campbell, Jr. Democratic 33%
Avery Alexander 10%
Rodney Alexander 70%
Glenn Ansardi 40%
Dennis Bagneris, Sr. 22%
Diana Bajoie 33%
Robert Barham 66%
Robert Barton 50%
Clara Baudoin 70%
Ernest Baylor, Jr. 10%
Ronald Bean 44%
Shirley Bowler 70%
Michael Franklin Branch 88%
Beverly Gourdon Bruce 60%
Emile Bruneau 60%
James Cain 77%
Thomas Casanova III 66%
Joel Chaisson II 60%
Jacquelyn Brechtel Clarkson 60%
Sherman Copelin, Jr. 20%
James Joseph Cox 55%
Carl Crane 90%
Donald Cravins, Sr. 33%
Israel Curtis 0%
N. J. Damico 50%
William Daniel IV 70%
Lynn Blackquell Dean 66%
John Dirk Deville 70%
Charles DeWitt, Jr. 50%
John Diez 80%
Jimmy Dimos 60%
Everett Doerge 50%
Hunt Downer, Jr. 60%
Reggie Dupre, Jr. 50%
Sydnie Mae Durand 70%
B.G. Dyess 66%
Noble Ellington 66%
Randy Ewing 44%
Naomi Farve 30%
Robert Faucheux, Jr. 70%
Wilson Fields 33%
Daniel Thomas Flavin 50%
Heulette Fontenot 90%
Mickey Frith 70%
Gregory Lee Fruge 60%
Butch Gautreaux 60%
Cedric Bradford Glover 30%
Kyle Mark Green 30%
Tom Greene 77%
Elcie Guillory 40%
John Joseph Hainkel, Jr. 44%
Alexander Heaton 30%
Troy Hebert 50%
Francis Heitmeier 55%
Herman Ray Hill 70%
Donald Hines 22%
Melvin Lee Holden 40%
Ken Hollis 55%
Roy Hopkins 60%
Charles Irvin Hudson 30%
Willie Hunter, Jr. 30%
Kay Iles 80%
Paulette Riley Irons 44%
Louis Jenkins 100%
Raymond Jetson 40%
Jon Johnson 66%
Charles Jones 44%
J. Lomax Jordan, Jr. 100%
Donald Kennard 80%
Lelon Kenney 70%
Louis Lambert, Jr. 77%
Charles Lancaster, Jr. 60%
Ron Landry 66%
Jerry Luke LeBlanc 70%
Arthur Lentini 66%
Jimmy Dale Long, Sr. 70%
Max Malone 77%
Robert Marionneaux, Jr. 50%
Audrey McCain 60%
Jay Bowen McCallum 70%
Charles McDonald 70%
F. Charles McMains, Jr. 80%
Michael Michot 60%
Danny Ray Mitchell, Sr. 40%
Billy Montgomery 40%
Kenneth Odinet, Sr. 40%
Anthony Richard Perkins 100%
Wilfred Pierre 40%
Gillis Pinac 50%
Henry Powell 80%
Renee Gill Pratt 20%
Roy Quezaire, Jr. 20%
Charles Riddle III 70%
Michael Robichaux 66%
Craig Romero 66%
Benny Gerarde Rousselle 50%
Joe Salter 70%
Matthew Schneider III 70%
B.L. Shaw 70%
Philip Short 100%
John Siracusa 66%
Jack Smith 60%
Kenneth Smith 66%
Victor Stelly 50%
R.H. Strain 80%
Mitchell Theriot 50%
Gerald Theunissen 50%
Jerry Thomas 60%
Tom Thornhill 80%
Joseph Toomy 40%
John Travis 40%
Warren Triche, Jr. 90%
J. Chris Ullo 77%
Thomas Warner 40%
Sharon Weston 70%
Randy Wiggins 80%
Pinkie Carolyn Wilkerson 70%
Cynthia Willard-Lewis 40%
Stephen Windhorst 80%
Diane Winston 50%
Thomas Wright 70%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top