Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Colorado National Federation of Independent Business

2007-2008 Positions on Pro-Small Business Policy

State Office District Name Party Rating
CO U.S. Senate Jr Cory Gardner Republican 86
CO State House 33 Dianne Primavera Democratic 43
CO State Senate 1 Jerry Sonnenberg Republican 100
CO State Senate 6 Ellen Roberts Republican 86
CO State Senate 9 Kent Lambert Republican 100
CO State Senate 11 Michael Merrifield Democratic 50
CO State Senate 14 John Kefalas Democratic 57
CO State Senate 22 Andy Kerr Democratic 57
CO State Senate 27 David Balmer Republican 100
CO State Senate 28 Nancy Todd Democratic 57
CO Council Member 1 Susan Shepherd 50
CO Public Utilities Commissioner Glenn Vaad Republican 100
CO Commissioner 2 Liane McFadyen Democratic 67
Bob Bacon 43
Debbie Benefield 57
Betty Boyd 43
Greg Brophy 86
Terrance Carroll 50
Edward Casso 57
Kathleen Curry 57
Randy Fischer 57
K. Jerry Frangas 50
Sara Gagliardi 43
Bob Gardner 86
Gwyn Green 60
Peter Groff 29
Ted Harvey 71
James Isgar 43
Joel Judd 57
Maryanne Keller 50
James Kerr 86
Kenneth Kester 86
Steven King 86
Mike Kopp 86
Jeanne Labuda 57
Claire Levy 57
Larry Liston 100
Marsha Looper 100
Don Marostica 100
Thomas Massey, Jr. 86
Michael May 86
Anne McGihon 57
Wes McKinley 57
Frank McNulty 86
Shawn Mitchell 86
John Morse 29
Cherylin Peniston 57
Joshua Penry 86
John Pommer 43
Scott Renfroe 86
Joe Rice 71
James Riesberg 57
Chris Romer 43
David Schultheis 83
Gail Schwartz 50
Brandon Shaffer 29
Judy Solano 57
John Soper 57
Nancy Spence 86
Amy Stephens 71
Kenneth Guy Summers 71
Spencer Swalm 100
Abel Tapia 43
Lois Tochtrop 33
Jennifer Veiga 43
Paul Weissmann 43
Suzanne Williams 43

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top