Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Federally Employed Women

2012 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Gary Ackerman 90%
Sandy Adams 30%
Daniel Akaka, Sr. 80%
Todd Akin 20%
Rodney Alexander 30%
Jason Altmire 80%
Rob Andrews 100%
Steve Austria 30%
Kelly Ayotte 10%
Joe Baca, Sr. 90%
Michele Bachmann 30%
Spencer Bachus 30%
Kay Bailey Hutchison 30%
Ron Barber 50%
John Barrow 60%
Roscoe Bartlett 50%
Charlie Bass 70%
Max Baucus 60%
Mark Begich 60%
Dan Benishek 30%
Rick Berg 40%
Shelley Berkley 80%
Howard Berman 80%
Judy Biggert 50%
Brian Bilbray 20%
Jeff Bingaman 80%
Tim Bishop 80%
John Boehner 20%
Jo Bonner, Jr. 30%
Mary Bono Mack 20%
Dan Boren 60%
Leonard Boswell 90%
Charles Boustany, Jr. 30%
Barbara Boxer 90%
Bruce Braley 90%
Paul Broun 40%
Corrine Brown 90%
Scott Brown 40%
Ann Marie Buerkle 10%
Dan Burton 20%
Dave Camp 30%
John Campbell III 30%
Francisco Canseco 30%
Eric Cantor 30%
Lois Capps 100%
Russ Carnahan 90%
Saxby Chambliss 20%
Ben Chandler III 90%
Hansen Clarke 100%
Dan Coats 30%
Howard Coble 30%
Thomas Coburn 10%
Kent Conrad 60%
Jerry Costello 90%
Chip Cravaack 30%
Ander Crenshaw 30%
Mark Critz 80%
Geoff Davis 40%
James DeMint 20%
Norm Dicks 70%
John Dingell 100%
Bob Dold 40%
David Dreier 30%
Donna Edwards 100%
Renee Ellmers 20%
Jo Ann Emerson 30%
Sam Farr 100%
Chaka Fattah, Sr. 90%
Bob Filner 50%
Stephen Fincher 30%
Mike Fitzpatrick 40%
John Fleming, Jr. 20%
Randy Forbes 30%
Barney Frank 90%
Elton Gallegly 30%
Scott Garrett 30%
Jim Gerlach 30%
Chris Gibson 50%
Phil Gingrey 30%
Charlie Gonzalez 90%
Michael Grimm 30%
Frank Guinta 20%
Kay Hagan 60%
Janice Hahn 90%
Ralph Hall 30%
Richard Hanna 50%
Tom Harkin 100%
Doc Hastings 30%
Nan Hayworth 30%
Joe Heck, Jr. 30%
Wally Herger, Jr. 30%
Maurice Hinchey 80%
Rubén Hinojosa, Sr. 90%
Thomas Holden 80%
Rush Holt, Jr. 90%
Mike Honda 80%
Tim Huelskamp 40%
Duncan Hunter 30%
Robert Hurt 30%
Daniel Inouye 70%
Steve Israel 100%
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 70%
Mike Johanns 10%
Timothy Johnson 60%
Tim Johnson 50%
John Kerry 90%
Dale Kildee 90%
Jack Kingston 30%
Mark Kirk 20%
Larry Kissell 80%
John Kline 30%
Herb Kohl 60%
Dennis Kucinich 100%
Jon Kyl 10%
Mary Landrieu 70%
Tom Latham 30%
Steve LaTourette 60%
Frank Lautenberg 90%
Carl Levin 90%
Jerry Lewis 30%
Joe Lieberman 60%
Dick Lugar 10%
Cynthia Lummis 40%
Dan Lungren 30%
Connie Mack IV 20%
Don Manzullo 30%
Jim Matheson 70%
Carolyn McCarthy 90%
Jim McDermott 80%
Mike McIntyre 50%
Buck McKeon 30%
John Mica 30%
Mike Michaud 100%
Barbara Mikulski 100%
Candice Miller 30%
Gary Miller 30%
George Miller 80%
Jeff Miller 30%
Brad Miller 90%
Jim Moran, Jr. 90%
Sue Myrick 30%
Ben Nelson 60%
Randy Neugebauer 30%
Rich Nugent 30%
Alan Nunnelee 30%
John Olver 80%
Bill Owens 80%
Ed Pastor 90%
Ron Paul 50%
Tom Petri 30%
Joe Pitts 30%
Todd Platts 50%
Mike Pompeo 30%
Mark Pryor 60%
Ben Quayle 30%
Nick Rahall II 70%
Charlie Rangel 80%
Denny Rehberg 40%
Harry Reid 60%
Silvestre Reyes 80%
Reid Ribble 20%
Laura Richardson 90%
Scott Rigell 30%
David Rivera 40%
Jay Rockefeller IV 60%
Mike Rogers 30%
Mike Ross 70%
Steve Rothman 90%
Jon Runyan 30%
Loretta Sanchez 100%
Bobby Schilling 30%
Jean Schmidt 20%
Aaron Schock 30%
Allyson Schwartz 90%
Heath Shuler 70%
Olympia Snowe 40%
Steve Southerland 20%
Pete Stark 80%
Cliff Stearns 30%
Marlin Stutzman 20%
John Sullivan 30%
Betty Sutton 100%
Lee Terry 30%
John Tierney 90%
Ed Towns 80%
Bob Turner 30%
Mark Udall 50%
David Vitter 10%
Joe Walsh 20%
Mel Watt 80%
Henry Waxman 90%
Jim Webb, Jr. 60%
Allen West 30%
Lynn Westmoreland 30%
Ed Whitfield 50%
Frank Wolf 60%
Lynn Woolsey 90%
Bill Young 40%
WI U.S. Senate Jr Tammy Baldwin Democratic 100%
CA U.S. House 37 Karen Bass Democratic 90%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top