Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Concerned Women for America

1995-1996 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Edmond Spencer Abraham 75%
Gary Ackerman 0%
Daniel Akaka, Sr. 25%
Wayne Allard 75%
Rob Andrews 33%
Bill Archer 75%
Richard Armey 75%
John Ashcroft 75%
Henry Scott Baesler 50%
Richard Hugh Baker 75%
Cass Ballenger 75%
James Barcia 75%
Bob Barr, Jr. 75%
Bill Barrett 75%
Roscoe Bartlett 100%
Charlie Bass 50%
Herbert Bateman 67%
Max Baucus 50%
Bob Bennett 67%
Kenneth Bentsen, Jr. 0%
Douglas Bereuter 50%
Howard Berman 0%
Brian Bilbray 50%
Michael Bilirakis 75%
Jeff Bingaman 50%
Thomas Bliley, Jr. 75%
Sherwood Boehlert 0%
Kit Bond 75%
Henry Bonilla 75%
David Edward Bonior 50%
Sonny Bono 75%
Robert Borski, Jr. 25%
Rick Boucher 25%
John Breaux 100%
George Brown, Jr. 25%
Richard Bryan 50%
Ed Bryant 75%
Dale Bumpers 50%
Jim Bunning 100%
Conrad Burns 75%
Dan Burton 75%
Steve Buyer 100%
Robert Byrd 50%
Herbert Callahan 75%
Ben Campbell 50%
FL Justice of the Supreme Court Charles Canady 75%
Mike Castle 25%
John Chafee 50%
Helen Chenoweth-Hage 100%
Jon Lynn Christensen 75%
William Clay, Sr. 25%
Eva Clayton 25%
Robert Clement 25%
Michael Collins 100%
Larry Combest 75%
Gary Condit 25%
Kent Conrad 75%
Jerry Costello 50%
Paul Coverdell 75%
Christopher Cox 75%
William Coyne 0%
Larry Craig 75%
Robert Cramer 25%
Philip Crane 100%
Barbara Cubin 100%
Randall Cunningham 75%
Alfonse D'Amato 75%
Patsy Ann Danner 25%
Thomas Daschle 50%
Thomas Davis III 25%
Thomas DeLay 100%
Ronald Dellums 25%
Peter Deutsch 0%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 100%
Jay Dickey 75%
Norm Dicks 0%
Julian Dixon 0%
Chris Dodd 50%
Pete Domenici, Jr. 50%
Calvin Dooley 0%
John Doolittle 100%
Byron Dorgan 75%
David Dreier 75%
Jennifer Dunn 50%
Chet Edwards 25%
Vern Ehlers 100%
Bob Ehrlich, Jr. 50%
Philip English 100%
John Ensign 100%
Lane Evans 25%
Terry Everett 75%
Thomas Ewing 100%
Duncan McLauchlin Faircloth 50%
Harris Fawell 50%
Victor Fazio 0%
Russ Feingold 50%
Bob Filner 25%
Floyd Flake 50%
Thomas Foglietta 25%
Mark Foley 50%
Michael Patrick Forbes 50%
Wendell Ford 100%
Tillie Fowler 50%
Jon David Fox 100%
Barney Frank 0%
Robert Franks 25%
William Frist 100%
Jonas Frost III 0%
Elizabeth Furse 0%
Elton Gallegly 75%
John Ganske 50%
Sam Gejdenson 0%
George Gekas 50%
Richard Andrew Gephardt 25%
Wayne Gilchrest 50%
Paul Gillmor 100%
Benjamin Gilman 0%
John Glenn 50%
Henry Gonzalez 0%
William Goodling 75%
Bart Gordon 25%
Slade Gorton 100%
Porter Goss 75%
Daniel Graham 50%
William Phillip Gramm 75%
Rodney Grams 75%
James Greenwood 25%
Judd Gregg 67%
Gilbert Gutknecht 75%
Tony Hall 100%
Lee Hamilton 25%
James Hansen 75%
Jane Harman 0%
J. Dennis Hastert 75%
J.D. Hayworth, Jr. 100%
Joel Hefley 75%
W.G. Hefner 50%
Jesse Helms 75%
Wally Herger, Jr. 75%
Van Hilleary 100%
Earl Hilliard, Jr. 25%
Maurice Hinchey 25%
David Lee Hobson 25%
Pete Hoekstra 100%
Thomas Holden 50%
Ernest Hollings 50%
Stephen Horn 0%
John Nathan Hostettler 100%
Amory Houghton, Jr. 0%
Duncan Hunter 75%
Y. Tim Hutchinson 75%
Kay Hutchison 75%
Henry Hyde 75%
Bob Inglis, Sr. 75%
Daniel Inouye 50%
Ernest Istook, Jr. 75%
William Jefferson 25%
James Merrill Jeffords 50%
Nancy Johnson 25%
Paul Kanjorski 25%
Sue Kelly 0%
Dirk Kempthorne 75%
Edward Kennedy, Sr. 33%
Joseph Kennedy II 0%
Patrick Kennedy 25%
Barbara Bailey Kennelly 0%
Bob Kerrey 25%
Dale Kildee 50%
Jay Kim 75%
Gerald Kleczka 25%
Ronald Klink 25%
Scott Klug 50%
Joseph Knollenberg 75%
Herb Kohl 50%
James Kolbe 25%
Jon Kyl 75%
John LaFalce 50%
Ray LaHood 100%
Tom Lantos 0%
Stephen Largent 75%
Steve LaTourette 75%
Frank Lautenberg 25%
Rick Lazio 50%
James Leach 25%
Jerry Lewis 50%
Ron Lewis 100%
Joe Lieberman 50%
John Linder 100%
William Lipinski 50%
Robert Livingston 75%
Trent Lott, Sr. 75%
Dick Lugar 75%
William Luther 0%
Connie Mack 75%
Thomas Manton 50%
Don Manzullo 100%
Matthew Martinez 50%
Frank Mascara 50%
Robert Matsui 25%
Karen McCarthy 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top