Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Concerned Women for America

2005-2006 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Gary Ackerman 15%
Daniel Akaka, Sr. 11%
Todd Akin 100%
Rodney Alexander 100%
Wayne Allard 100%
George Allen 100%
Thomas Allen 31%
Rob Andrews 23%
Joe Baca, Sr. 36%
Brian Baird 21%
Richard Hugh Baker 100%
J. Gresham Barrett 100%
Roscoe Bartlett 93%
Charlie Bass 57%
Max Baucus 11%
Evan Bayh 11%
Melissa Bean 43%
Bob Beauprez 92%
Bob Bennett 100%
Shelley Berkley 14%
Howard Berman 8%
Marion Berry 79%
Judy Biggert 50%
Brian Bilbray 60%
Michael Bilirakis 100%
Jeff Bingaman 22%
Sherwood Boehlert 46%
Kit Bond 100%
Henry Bonilla 100%
Jo Bonner, Jr. 100%
Mary Bono Mack 60%
Dan Boren 79%
Leonard Boswell 62%
Rick Boucher 42%
Allen Boyd, Jr. 62%
Henry Brown, Jr. 100%
Ginny Brown-Waite 71%
Jim Bunning 100%
Conrad Burns 100%
Dan Burton 100%
Steve Buyer 100%
Robert Byrd 56%
Chris Cannon 100%
Eric Cantor 100%
Dennis Cardoza 54%
Russ Carnahan 29%
Julia Carson 21%
Edward Case 31%
Mike Castle 43%
Ben Chandler III 64%
Chris Chocola 100%
Hillary Clinton 11%
Norm Coleman 100%
Kent Conrad 33%
Jerry Costello 93%
Larry Craig 100%
Robert Cramer 64%
Barbara Cubin 100%
Artur Davis 46%
Geoff Davis 100%
James Davis 17%
Jo Ann Davis 100%
Lincoln Davis 100%
Thomas Davis III 71%
Bill Delahunt 8%
Thomas DeLay 100%
James DeMint 100%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 93%
Norm Dicks 36%
Chris Dodd 0%
Elizabeth Dole 100%
Pete Domenici, Jr. 100%
John Doolittle 100%
Byron Dorgan 0%
Thelma Drake 100%
David Dreier 71%
Chet Edwards 57%
Vern Ehlers 100%
Jo Ann Emerson 79%
Philip English 93%
John Ensign 100%
Bob Etheridge 64%
Lane Evans 22%
Terry Everett 100%
Tom Feeney 100%
Russ Feingold 0%
Michael Ferguson 100%
Bob Filner 17%
Mark Foley 57%
Harold Ford, Jr. 54%
Vito Fossella, Jr. 71%
Barney Frank 7%
William Frist 89%
Elton Gallegly 100%
Jim Gibbons 67%
Wayne Gilchrest 38%
Paul Gillmor 100%
Charlie Gonzalez 23%
Virgil Goode, Jr. 100%
Bart Gordon 62%
Mark Green 100%
Judd Gregg 100%
Gilbert Gutknecht 100%
Jane Harman 17%
Katherine Harris 100%
Melissa Hart 100%
J. Dennis Hastert 100%
Robert Hayes 100%
J.D. Hayworth, Jr. 100%
Joel Hefley 100%
Wally Herger, Jr. 100%
Stephanie Herseth Sandlin 57%
Maurice Hinchey 9%
David Lee Hobson 100%
Pete Hoekstra 100%
Thomas Holden 79%
Darlene Hooley 31%
John Nathan Hostettler 100%
Kenny Hulshof 100%
Duncan Hunter 100%
Kay Hutchison 100%
Henry Hyde 100%
Bob Inglis, Sr. 92%
Daniel Inouye 33%
Ernest Istook, Jr. 100%
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 29%
William Jefferson 31%
James Merrill Jeffords 0%
William Lewis Jenkins 100%
Nancy Johnson 38%
Tim Johnson 93%
Paul Kanjorski 50%
Ric Keller 100%
Sue Kelly 64%
Edward Kennedy, Sr. 0%
Mark Kennedy 100%
Patrick Kennedy 15%
Dale Kildee 64%
Carolyn Kilpatrick 23%
Joseph Knollenberg 92%
Herb Kohl 14%
James Kolbe 38%
Dennis Kucinich 8%
John Kuhl, Jr. 100%
Jon Kyl 100%
Ray LaHood 93%
Tom Lantos 25%
Steve LaTourette 77%
Frank Lautenberg 0%
James Leach 64%
Jerry Lewis 71%
Ron Lewis 100%
Joe Lieberman 33%
Blanche Lincoln 0%
John Linder 100%
Trent Lott, Sr. 100%
Dick Lugar 100%
Dan Lungren 92%
Connie Mack IV 71%
Don Manzullo 100%
Jim Marshall 93%
Melquiades Martinez 100%
Thaddeus McCotter 93%
James McCrery III 100%
John McHugh 93%
Cynthia Ann McKinney 20%
Michael McNulty 38%
Martin Meehan 31%
Kendrick Meek, Sr. 36%
Charlie Melancon, Sr. 69%
Juanita Millender-McDonald 33%
Brad Miller 36%
Alan Mollohan 86%
Dennis Moore 46%
Jack Murtha 50%
Marilyn Musgrave 100%
Sue Myrick 100%
Ben Nelson 89%
Robert William Ney 93%
Anne Northup 100%
Charles Norwood, Jr. 100%
James Nussle 100%
Jim Oberstar 80%
Dave Obey 46%
John Olver 14%
Solomon Ortiz, Sr. 62%
Thomas William Osborne 100%
Major Owens 15%
Michael Oxley 100%
Ron Paul 62%
Donald Payne 15%
John Peterson 100%
Charles Pickering, Jr. 100%
Todd Platts 71%
Richard Pombo 92%
Earl Pomeroy 57%
Jon Porter, Sr. 64%
Deborah Pryce 79%
George Radanovich 100%
James Ramstad 71%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top