Search Form
Now choose a category »

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Concerned Women for America

2003 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Gary Ackerman 8%
Daniel Akaka, Sr. 0%
Todd Akin 100%
Rodney Alexander 92%
Wayne Allard 100%
George Allen 100%
Thomas Allen 8%
Rob Andrews 8%
Joe Baca, Sr. 17%
Brian Baird 8%
Richard Hugh Baker 100%
Frank Ballance, Jr. 0%
Cass Ballenger 100%
J. Gresham Barrett 100%
Roscoe Bartlett 100%
Charlie Bass 69%
Max Baucus 0%
Evan Bayh 22%
Bob Beauprez 100%
Chris Bell 23%
Bob Bennett 100%
Douglas Bereuter 92%
Shelley Berkley 10%
Howard Berman 0%
Marion Berry 85%
Judy Biggert 62%
Michael Bilirakis 100%
Jeff Bingaman 0%
Sherwood Boehlert 54%
Kit Bond 100%
Henry Bonilla 92%
Jo Bonner, Jr. 100%
Mary Bono Mack 92%
Leonard Boswell 67%
Rick Boucher 31%
Allen Boyd, Jr. 73%
John Breaux 67%
Henry Brown, Jr. 100%
Ginny Brown-Waite 100%
Jim Bunning 100%
Conrad Burns 100%
Max Burns 100%
Dan Burton 100%
Steve Buyer 100%
Robert Byrd 25%
Ben Campbell 78%
Chris Cannon 92%
Eric Cantor 100%
Dennis Cardoza 38%
Brad Carson 64%
Julia Carson 27%
Edward Case 23%
Mike Castle 46%
Chris Chocola 100%
Hillary Clinton 0%
Norm Coleman 100%
Michael Collins 100%
Kent Conrad 22%
Jon Corzine 0%
Jerry Costello 92%
Christopher Cox 100%
Larry Craig 100%
Robert Cramer 83%
Philip Crane 100%
Barbara Cubin 100%
Randall Cunningham 100%
Thomas Daschle 22%
Artur Davis 46%
James Davis 31%
Jo Ann Davis 100%
Lincoln Davis 83%
Thomas Davis III 69%
Bill Delahunt 0%
Thomas DeLay 100%
James DeMint 100%
Peter Deutsch 31%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 92%
Norm Dicks 0%
Chris Dodd 0%
Elizabeth Dole 100%
Pete Domenici, Jr. 100%
Calvin Dooley 15%
John Doolittle 100%
Byron Dorgan 22%
David Dreier 73%
Jennifer Dunn 92%
John Edwards 0%
Chet Edwards 31%
Vern Ehlers 92%
Jo Ann Emerson 100%
Philip English 85%
John Ensign 100%
Bob Etheridge 46%
Lane Evans 8%
Terry Everett 100%
Tom Feeney 100%
Russ Feingold 0%
Michael Ferguson 100%
Bob Filner 8%
Peter Fitzgerald 100%
Mark Foley 92%
Harold Ford, Jr. 56%
Vito Fossella, Jr. 91%
Barney Frank 0%
William Frist 100%
Jonas Frost III 17%
Elton Gallegly 92%
Jim Gibbons 100%
Wayne Gilchrest 54%
Paul Gillmor 92%
Charlie Gonzalez 15%
Virgil Goode, Jr. 100%
Bart Gordon 69%
Porter Goss 100%
Daniel Graham 0%
Mark Green 100%
James Greenwood 42%
Judd Gregg 100%
Gilbert Gutknecht 100%
Jane Harman 9%
Katherine Harris 100%
Melissa Hart 100%
J. Dennis Hastert 100%
Robert Hayes 100%
J.D. Hayworth, Jr. 92%
Joel Hefley 100%
Wally Herger, Jr. 100%
Baron Hill 67%
Maurice Hinchey 8%
David Lee Hobson 85%
PA Commissioner At-Large Joseph Hoeffel 25%
Pete Hoekstra 100%
Thomas Holden 85%
Ernest Hollings 25%
Darlene Hooley 38%
John Nathan Hostettler 100%
Amory Houghton, Jr. 36%
Kenny Hulshof 100%
Duncan Hunter 100%
Kay Hutchison 88%
Henry Hyde 100%
Daniel Inouye 0%
Ernest Istook, Jr. 100%
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 8%
William Janklow 100%
William Jefferson 50%
James Merrill Jeffords 11%
William Lewis Jenkins 100%
Christopher John 92%
Nancy Johnson 25%
Tim Johnson 92%
Paul Kanjorski 62%
Ric Keller 100%
Sue Kelly 77%
Edward Kennedy, Sr. 0%
Mark Kennedy 100%
Patrick Kennedy 15%
Dale Kildee 62%
Carolyn Kilpatrick 8%
Gerald Kleczka 31%
Joseph Knollenberg 92%
Herb Kohl 0%
James Kolbe 38%
Dennis Kucinich 25%
Jon Kyl 100%
Ray LaHood 100%
Nicholas Lampson 54%
Tom Lantos 0%
Steve LaTourette 92%
Frank Lautenberg 0%
James Leach 50%
Jerry Lewis 77%
Ron Lewis 100%
Joe Lieberman 0%
Blanche Lincoln 22%
John Linder 92%
William Lipinski 83%
Trent Lott, Sr. 100%
Dick Lugar 100%
Denise Majette 15%
Don Manzullo 100%
Jim Marshall 69%
Robert Matsui 15%
Karen McCarthy 10%
Thaddeus McCotter 100%
James McCrery III 92%
John McHugh 92%
Scott McInnis 100%
Michael McNulty 62%
Martin Meehan 8%
Kendrick Meek, Sr. 18%
Juanita Millender-McDonald 20%
Brad Miller 15%
Zell Bryan Miller 100%
Alan Mollohan 77%
Dennis Moore 38%
Jack Murtha 69%
Marilyn Musgrave 100%
Sue Myrick 100%
Ben Nelson 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top