Rating Group: Congress of California Seniors

2010 Positions

State Office Name Party Rating
CA U.S. House-2 Jared Huffman D 100%
CA U.S. House-8 Paul Cook R 29%
CA U.S. House-10 Jeff Denham R 22%
CA U.S. House-26 Julia Brownley D 100%
CA U.S. House-35 Gloria Negrete McLeod D 100%
CA U.S. House-37 Karen Bass D 95%
CA U.S. House-47 Alan Lowenthal D 100%
CA State Assembly-2 Wesley Chesbro D 100%
CA State Assembly-3 Dan Logue R 24%
CA State Assembly-4 Mariko Yamada D 100%
CA State Assembly-15 Nancy Skinner D 100%
CA State Assembly-16 Joan Buchanan D 81%
CA State Assembly-17 Tom Ammiano D 100%
CA State Assembly-26 Connie Conway R 24%
CA State Assembly-28 Paul Fong D 100%
CA State Assembly-42 Brian Nestande R 38%
CA State Assembly-43 Mike Gatto D 95%
CA State Assembly-53 John Pérez D 100%
CA State Assembly-55 Curt Hagman R 29%
CA State Assembly-56 Manuel Pérez D 95%
CA State Assembly-62 Steven Bradford D 95%
CA State Assembly-64 Isadore Hall III D 90%
CA State Assembly-70 Bonnie Lowenthal D 100%
CA State Assembly-73 Diane Harkey R 24%
CA State Senate-1 Ted Gaines R 33%
CA State Senate-2 Noreen Evans D 100%
CA State Senate-3 Lois Wolk D 100%
CA State Senate-4 Jim Nielsen R 24%
CA State Senate-5 Cathleen Galgiani D 71%
CA State Senate-6 Darrell Steinberg D 100%
CA State Senate-7 Mark DeSaulnier D 94%
CA State Senate-8 Leland Yee D 94%
CA State Senate-9 Loni Hancock D 94%
CA State Senate-10 Ellen Corbett D 100%
CA State Senate-11 Mark Leno D 100%
CA State Senate-13 Gerald Hill D 100%
CA State Senate-14 Thomas Berryhill R 28%
CA State Senate-15 James Beall, Jr. D 95%
CA State Senate-17 Bill Monning D 100%
CA State Senate-18 Jean Fuller R 29%
CA State Senate-20 Alex Padilla D 89%
CA State Senate-21 Steve Knight R 19%
CA State Senate-22 Kevin de Leon D 100%
CA State Senate-24 Edward Hernandez D 100%
CA State Senate-25 Carol Liu D 100%
CA State Senate-27 Fran Pavley D 100%
CA State Senate-28 Ted Lieu D 100%
CA State Senate-29 Robert Huff R 28%
CA State Senate-30 Ron Calderon D 88%
CA State Senate-32 Norma Torres D 100%
CA State Senate-34 Lou Correa D 56%
CA State Senate-35 Roderick Wright D 83%
CA State Senate-36 Joel Anderson R 19%
CA State Senate-37 Mimi Walters R 24%
CA State Senate-38 Mark Wyland R 22%
CA Insurance Commissioner Dave Jones D 95%
CA Supervisor-1 Kevin Jeffries R 29%
CA Supervisor-5 Saren Simitian D 94%
CA Council Member-1 Gilbert Cedillo D 100%
CA Council Member-3 Bob Blumenfield D 100%
CA Council Member-6 David Cogdill R 28%
CA Council Member-7 Felipe Fuentes D 95%
CA Council Member-9 Curren Price, Jr. D 100%
CA Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Torlakson D 100%
Samuel Aanestad 33%
Anthony Adams 24%
Elaine Alquist 100%
Juan Arambula 95%
Roy Ashburn 28%
Bill Berryhill 24%
Sam Blakeslee 33%
Anna Caballero 90%
Charles Calderon 90%
Amina Carter 100%
Joe Coto 100%
Mike Davis 100%
Hector De La Torre 100%
Charles DeVore 24%
Denise Ducheny 94%
Robert Dutton 22%
Bill Emmerson 18%
Mike Eng 95%
Mike Feuer 100%
Nathan Fletcher 35%
Dean Florez 100%
Warren Furutani 76%
Martin Garrick 24%
Danny Gilmore 43%
Tom Harman 36%
Mary Hayashi 100%
Dennis Hollingsworth 27%
Alyson Huber 76%
Christine Kehoe 94%
Fiona Ma 100%
Tony Mendoza 100%
Jeff Miller 19%
Pedro Nava 95%
Roger Niello 24%
Chris Norby 30%
Jenny Oropeza 50%
Anthony Portantino, Jr. 100%
Gloria Romero 100%
George Runner, Jr. 22%
Ira Ruskin 100%
Mary Salas 100%
Lori Saldaña 100%
Jim Silva 24%
Cameron Smyth 30%
Jose Solorio 100%
Tony Strickland 28%
Audra Strickland 24%
Sandré Swanson 100%
Alberto Torrico 100%
Van Tran 24%
Mike Villines 35%
Patricia Wiggins 80%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.