Rating Group: Congress of California Seniors

2009 Positions

State Office Name Party Rating
CA U.S. House-2 Jared Huffman D 100%
CA U.S. House-8 Paul Cook R 36%
CA U.S. House-10 Jeff Denham R 25%
CA U.S. House-26 Julia Brownley D 100%
CA U.S. House-35 Gloria Negrete McLeod D 75%
CA U.S. House-37 Karen Bass D 83%
CA U.S. House-47 Alan Lowenthal D 100%
CA State Assembly-2 Wesley Chesbro D 92%
CA State Assembly-3 Dan Logue R 25%
CA State Assembly-4 Mariko Yamada D 100%
CA State Assembly-15 Nancy Skinner D 100%
CA State Assembly-16 Joan Buchanan D 67%
CA State Assembly-17 Tom Ammiano D 100%
CA State Assembly-26 Connie Conway R 33%
CA State Assembly-28 Paul Fong D 100%
CA State Assembly-42 Brian Nestande R 33%
CA State Assembly-53 John Pérez D 100%
CA State Assembly-55 Curt Hagman R 25%
CA State Assembly-56 Manuel Pérez D 92%
CA State Assembly-64 Isadore Hall III D 83%
CA State Assembly-70 Bonnie Lowenthal D 100%
CA State Assembly-73 Diane Harkey R 33%
CA State Senate-1 Ted Gaines R 18%
CA State Senate-2 Noreen Evans D 100%
CA State Senate-3 Lois Wolk D 92%
CA State Senate-4 Jim Nielsen R 25%
CA State Senate-5 Cathleen Galgiani D 67%
CA State Senate-6 Darrell Steinberg D 100%
CA State Senate-7 Mark DeSaulnier D 100%
CA State Senate-8 Leland Yee D 92%
CA State Senate-9 Loni Hancock D 100%
CA State Senate-10 Ellen Corbett D 100%
CA State Senate-11 Mark Leno D 100%
CA State Senate-13 Gerald Hill D 100%
CA State Senate-14 Tom Berryhill R 25%
CA State Senate-15 James Beall, Jr. D 100%
CA State Senate-17 Bill Monning D 100%
CA State Senate-18 Jean Fuller R 25%
CA State Senate-20 Alex Padilla D 91%
CA State Senate-21 Steve Knight R 33%
CA State Senate-22 Kevin de Leon D 100%
CA State Senate-24 Edward Hernandez D 92%
CA State Senate-25 Carol Liu D 92%
CA State Senate-27 Fran Pavley D 100%
CA State Senate-28 Ted Lieu D 92%
CA State Senate-29 Robert Huff R 25%
CA State Senate-30 Ron Calderon D 92%
CA State Senate-32 Norma Torres D 100%
CA State Senate-34 Lou Correa D 67%
CA State Senate-36 Joel Anderson R 25%
CA State Senate-37 Mimi Walters R 25%
CA State Senate-38 Mark Wyland R 27%
CA State Senate-39 Martin Block D 92%
CA Insurance Commissioner Dave Jones D 100%
CA Supervisor-1 Kevin Jeffries R 33%
CA Supervisor-4 John Benoit 18%
CA Supervisor-5 Saren Simitian D 100%
CA Council Member-1 Gilbert Cedillo D 91%
CA Council Member-2 Paul Krekorian D 100%
CA Council Member-3 Bob Blumenfield D 100%
CA Council Member-6 David Cogdill R 33%
CA Council Member-7 Felipe Fuentes D 91%
CA Council Member-9 Curren Price, Jr. D 100%
CA Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Torlakson D 100%
Samuel Aanestad 25%
Anthony Adams 50%
Elaine Alquist 100%
Juan Arambula 100%
Roy Ashburn 42%
Bill Berryhill 25%
Sam Blakeslee 33%
Anna Caballero 100%
Charles Calderon 75%
Amina Carter 92%
Joe Coto 100%
Dave Cox 33%
Mike Davis 100%
Hector De La Torre 100%
Charles DeVore 17%
Denise Ducheny 100%
Robert Dutton 25%
Michael Duvall 42%
Bill Emmerson 42%
Mike Eng 92%
Mike Feuer 100%
Nathan Fletcher 20%
Dean Florez 100%
Warren Furutani 100%
Martin Garrick 33%
Danny Gilmore 42%
Tom Harman 25%
Mary Hayashi 100%
Dennis Hollingsworth 17%
Alyson Huber 67%
Christine Kehoe 92%
Fiona Ma 100%
Abel Maldonado 58%
Tony Mendoza 100%
Jeff Miller 25%
Pedro Nava 100%
Roger Niello 42%
Jenny Oropeza 70%
Anthony Portantino, Jr. 92%
Gloria Romero 100%
George Runner, Jr. 25%
Ira Ruskin 100%
Mary Salas 100%
Lori Saldaña 100%
Jim Silva 25%
Cameron Smyth 27%
Jose Solorio 92%
Tony Strickland 33%
Audra Strickland 25%
Sandré Swanson 100%
Alberto Torrico 100%
Van Tran 33%
Mike Villines 36%
Patricia Wiggins 100%
Roderick Wright 92%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.