| State | Office | District | Name | Party | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CA | U.S. House | 1 | Doug LaMalfa | Republican | 38% |
| CA | U.S. House | 4 | Tom McClintock | Republican | 19% |
| CA | U.S. House | 10 | Jeff Denham | Republican | 19% |
| CA | U.S. House | 14 | Jackie Speier | Democratic | 94% |
| CA | U.S. House | 23 | Kevin McCarthy | Republican | 38% |
| CA | U.S. House | 27 | Judy Chu | Democratic | 100% |
| CA | U.S. House | 35 | Gloria Negrete McLeod | Democratic | 88% |
| CA | U.S. House | 45 | John Campbell III | Republican | 38% |
| CA | U.S. House | 47 | Alan Lowenthal | Democratic | 100% |
| CA | U.S. House | 51 | Juan Vargas | Democratic | 100% |
| CA | State Assembly | 2 | Wesley Chesbro | Democratic | 100% |
| CA | State Senate | 3 | Lois Wolk | Democratic | 100% |
| CA | State Senate | 8 | Leland Yee | Democratic | 100% |
| CA | State Senate | 9 | Loni Hancock | Democratic | 100% |
| CA | State Senate | 11 | Mark Leno | Democratic | 100% |
| CA | State Senate | 25 | Carol Liu | Democratic | 94% |
| CA | State Senate | 27 | Fran Pavley | Democratic | 94% |
| CA | State Senate | 30 | Ron Calderon | Democratic | 100% |
| CA | State Senate | 38 | Mark Wyland | Republican | 44% |
| CA | Secretary of State | Debra Bowen | Democratic | 87% | |
| CA | Supervisor | 2 | Mark Ridley-Thomas | Democratic | 100% |
| CA | Supervisor | 3 | Wilma Chan | Democratic | 100% |
| CA | Supervisor | 4 | John Benoit | 31% | |
| CA | Council Member | 5 | Paul Koretz | Democratic | 100% |
| CA | Superintendent of Public Instruction | Tom Torlakson | Non-partisan | 94% | |
| CA | Councilmember | At-Large | David Cogdill | Republican | 31% |
| CA | Mayor Pro Tempore | At-Large | Alan Nakanishi | 38% | |
| Samuel Aanestad | 27% | ||||
| Richard Ackerman | 6% | ||||
| Gregory Aghazarian | 38% | ||||
| Richard Alarcón | 94% | ||||
| Roy Ashburn | 13% | ||||
| James Battin | 19% | ||||
| Patty Berg | 100% | ||||
| Rudy Bermúdez | 100% | ||||
| Russell Bogh | 56% | ||||
| Joseph Canciamilla | 88% | ||||
| Gilbert Cedillo | 94% | ||||
| Edward Chavez | 94% | ||||
| Rebecca Cohn | 94% | ||||
| Dave Cox | 38% | ||||
| Lynn Daucher | 47% | ||||
| Denise Ducheny | 94% | ||||
| Joseph Dunn | 100% | ||||
| Robert Dutton | 31% | ||||
| Mervyn Dymally | 88% | ||||
| Martha Escutia | 100% | ||||
| Liz Figueroa | 94% | ||||
| Dean Florez | 81% | ||||
| Dario Frommer | 100% | ||||
| Bonnie Garcia | 47% | ||||
| Jackie Goldberg | 100% | ||||
| Tom Harman | 56% | ||||
| Raymond Haynes, Jr. | 25% | ||||
| Dennis Hollingsworth | 6% | ||||
| Jerome Horton | 94% | ||||
| Shirley Horton | 38% | ||||
| Guy Houston | 44% | ||||
| Richard Keene | 44% | ||||
| Christine Kehoe | 100% | ||||
| Sheila Kuehl | 100% | ||||
| John Laird | 100% | ||||
| Jay La Suer | 31% | ||||
| Robert Leslie | 38% | ||||
| Lloyd Levine | 100% | ||||
| Sally Lieber | 100% | ||||
| Michael Machado | 81% | ||||
| Abel Maldonado | 50% | ||||
| Bob Margett | 20% | ||||
| Barbara Matthews | 81% | ||||
| Bill Maze | 50% | ||||
| Cindy Montañez | 100% | ||||
| William Phillip Morrow | 13% | ||||
| Dennis Lee Mountjoy | 38% | ||||
| Eugene Mullin | 100% | ||||
| Kevin Murray | 100% | ||||
| Joseph Nation | 100% | ||||
| Fabian Núñez | 100% | ||||
| Jenny Oropeza | 100% | ||||
| Deborah Ortiz | 100% | ||||
| Nicole Parra | 94% | ||||
| Don Perata | 100% | ||||
| George Plescia | 31% | ||||
| Charles Poochigian | 13% | ||||
| Keith Stuart Richman | 56% | ||||
| Gloria Romero | 93% | ||||
| Sharon Runner | 38% | ||||
| Simón Salinas | 100% | ||||
| Jack Scott | 94% | ||||
| Saren Simitian | 100% | ||||
| Nell Soto | 94% | ||||
| Todd Spitzer | 38% | ||||
| Audra Strickland | 38% | ||||
| Edward Vincent | 85% |
Issues:
Senior Citizens
How to Interpret these Evaluations
Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.
Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.
