Rating Group: Congress of California Seniors

2002 Positions

State Office Name Party Rating
CA U.S. House-4 Tom McClintock R 18%
CA U.S. House-14 Jackie Speier D 88%
CA U.S. House-27 Judy Chu D 100%
CA U.S. House-46 Lou Correa D 59%
CA U.S. House-47 Alan Lowenthal D 94%
CA U.S. House-51 Juan Vargas D 94%
CA State Senate-19 Hannah-Beth Jackson D 94%
CA State Senate-36 Pat Bates R 35%
CA Mayor-At-Large Darrell Steinberg D 100%
CA Supervisor-3 Wilma Chan 100%
CA Supervisor-5 Bruce McPherson 24%
CA Supervisor-5 Joe Simitian N/A 88%
CA Council Member-1 Gilbert Cedillo 100%
CA Council Member-5 Paul Koretz 100%
CA Council Member-10 Herb Wesson, Jr. 100%
CA State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Torlakson Other 88%
Samuel Aanestad 41%
Richard Ackerman 6%
Richard Alarcón 100%
Deirdre Alpert 100%
Roy Ashburn 29%
James Battin 18%
Russell Bogh 35%
Debra Bowen 88%
James Brulte 18%
John Burton 100%
Ron Calderon 88%
John Campbell III 31%
Joseph Canciamilla 94%
Edward Chavez 94%
Wesley Chesbro 94%
David Cogdill 35%
Rebecca Cohn 94%
Ellen Corbett 82%
Dave Cox 29%
Lynn Daucher 35%
Manny Diaz 100%
Joe Dunn 94%
John Anthony Dutra 94%
Martha Escutia 82%
Liz Figueroa 94%
Marco Antonio Firebaugh 100%
Dean Florez 88%
Dario Frommer 100%
Jackie Goldberg 100%
Tom Harman 47%
Ray Haynes, Jr. 12%
Dennis Hollingsworth 31%
Jerome Horton 82%
Ross Johnson 6%
Betty Karnette 94%
Christine Kehoe 94%
William Knight 18%
Sheila Kuehl 100%
Jay La Suer 35%
Robert Leslie 35%
Carol Liu 71%
John Longville 100%
Michael Machado 94%
Ken Maddox 35%
Abel Maldonado 41%
Bob Margett 24%
Barbara Matthews 65%
William Phillip Morrow 12%
Dennis Lee Mountjoy 29%
Kevin Murray 82%
George Nakano 82%
Joseph Nation 88%
Gloria Negrete McLeod 82%
Thomas Oller 18%
Jenny Oropeza 88%
Deborah Ortiz 88%
Robert Pacheco 41%
Fran Pavley 88%
Don Perata 88%
Charles Poochigian 19%
Sarah Reyes 100%
Keith Stuart Richman 29%
Gloria Romero 94%
George Runner, Jr. 18%
Simón Salinas 100%
Jack Scott 94%
Byron Sher 81%
Nell Soto 94%
Tony Strickland 35%
John Vasconcellos 88%
Edward Vincent 67%
Patricia Wiggins 94%
Mark Wyland 35%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.