Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Nodak Outdoors

2003 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
ND State House 3 Andrew Maragos Republican 89%
ND State House 8 Jeff Delzer Republican 50%
ND State House 9 Tracy Boe Democratic-NPL 58%
ND State House 10 David Monson Republican 71%
ND State House 13 Kim Koppelman Republican 97%
ND State House 14 Jon Nelson Republican 79%
ND State House 14 Robin Weisz Republican 50%
ND State House 15 Dennis Johnson Republican 85%
ND State House 23 Bill Devlin Republican 63%
ND State House 27 Randy Boehning Republican 86%
ND State House 29 Craig Headland Republican 70%
ND State House 29 Chet Pollert Republican 77%
ND State House 32 Lisa Meier Republican 93%
ND State House 33 Gary Kreidt Republican 70%
ND State House 34 Todd Porter Republican 100%
ND State House 35 Bob Martinson Republican 69%
ND State House 38 Larry Bellew Republican 36%
ND State House 38 Dan Ruby Republican 41%
ND State House 39 Keith Kempenich Republican 63%
ND State House 40 Randy Schobinger Republican 61%
ND State House 41 Al Carlson Republican 92%
ND State House 43 Lois Delmore Democratic-NPL 89%
ND State House 46 James Kasper Republican 93%
ND State House 47 George Keiser Republican 79%
ND State House 47 Lawrence Klemin Republican 77%
ND State Senate 11 Tim Mathern Democratic-NPL 100%
ND State Senate 13 Judy Lee Republican 96%
ND State Senate 14 Jerry Klein Republican 70%
ND State Senate 17 Ray Holmberg Republican 96%
ND State Senate 21 Carolyn Nelson Democratic-NPL 100%
ND State Senate 22 Gary Lee Republican 96%
ND State Senate 24 Larry Robinson Democratic-NPL 92%
ND State Senate 28 Robert Erbele Republican 38%
ND State Senate 32 Dick Dever Republican 84%
ND State Senate 34 Dwight Cook Republican 100%
ND State Senate 37 Rich Wardner Republican 81%
ND State Senate 39 Bill Bowman Republican 29%
ND State Senate 40 Karen Krebsbach Republican 70%
ND State Senate 47 Ralph Kilzer Republican 59%
ND Commissioner At-Large Merle Boucher 74%
Ole Aarsvold 96%
Bill Amerman 36%
John Andrist 46%
Wesley Belter 80%
Dennis Bercier 94%
Rick Berg 93%
LeRoy Bernstein 96%
Richard Brown 84%
Thomas Brusegaard 45%
Ron Carlisle 99%
Randel Christmann 40%
Duane Lee DeKrey 61%
Mark Dosch 93%
David Drovdal 67%
Mary Ekstrom 90%
Duaine Espegard 96%
Michael Every 81%
April Fairfield 100%
Tom Fischer 96%
Tim Flakoll 91%
Layton Freborg 81%
Rod Froelich 29%
Glen Froseth 50%
Pat Galvin 70%
Eliot Glassheim 91%
Bette Grande 88%
Tony Grindberg 100%
Michael Grosz 62%
Pam Gulleson 40%
C.B. Haas 65%
Lyle Hanson 96%
Kathy Hawken 100%
Joel Curtis Heitkamp 81%
Gil Herbel 77%
Bob Hunskor 77%
Ron Iverson 84%
Nancy Johnson 61%
RaeAnn Kelsch 93%
Scot Kelsh 97%
James Kerzman 51%
Joyce Kingsbury 77%
Frank Klein 59%
Matthew Klein 66%
Aaron Krauter 73%
William Kretschmar 68%
Edroy Kringstad 81%
Joe Kroeber 100%
Elroy Lindaas 94%
Stanley Lyson 94%
Ralph Metcalf 88%
Phillip Mueller 100%
Duane Mutch 54%
Dave Nething 93%
Eugene Nicholas 79%
Ronald Nichols 100%
Carol Niemeier 74%
Mike Norland 79%
Darrell Nottestad 77%
David O'Connell 62%
Kenton Onstad 88%
Michael Polovitz 77%
Louise Potter 94%
Clara Sue Price 86%
Earl Rennerfeldt 58%
Sally Sandvig 53%
Arlo Schmidt 74%
Tom Seymour 89%
Margaret Sitte 71%
Robert Skarphol 52%
Dorvan Solberg 80%
Bob Stenehjem 91%
Ken Svedjan 86%
John Syverson 96%
Harvey Tallackson 100%
Ryan Taylor 86%
Russell Thane 83%
Blair Thoreson 84%
Elwood Thorpe 86%
Mike Timm 70%
Ben Tollefson 100%
John Traynor 78%
Thomas Trenbeath 84%
Gerald Uglem 63%
Herbert Urlacher 53%
Francis Wald 54%
John Warner 59%
Amy N Kliniske Warnke 90%
Dave Weiler 100%
Alon Wieland 100%
Ray Wikenheiser 70%
Clark Williams 100%
Lonny Winrich 94%
Dwight Wrangham 52%
Steven Zaiser 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top