Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council

2004 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Brad Miller 40%
Alan Mollohan 13%
Dennis Moore 47%
Jack Murtha 27%
Marilyn Musgrave 100%
Sue Myrick 93%
Ben Nelson 73%
Robert William Ney 93%
Anne Northup 87%
Charles Norwood, Jr. 93%
James Nussle 93%
Jim Oberstar 7%
Dave Obey 20%
John Olver 13%
Solomon Ortiz, Sr. 33%
Thomas William Osborne 80%
Major Owens 20%
Michael Oxley 100%
Ron Paul 79%
Donald Payne 7%
John Peterson 93%
Charles Pickering, Jr. 93%
Todd Platts 80%
Richard Pombo 87%
Earl Pomeroy 33%
Jon Porter, Sr. 93%
Deborah Pryce 93%
George Radanovich 100%
James Ramstad 100%
Ralph Regula 93%
Denny Rehberg 93%
Richard Renzi 87%
Silvestre Reyes 46%
Thomas Reynolds 93%
Mike Ross 47%
Steve Rothman 20%
Jim Ryun 100%
Martin Olav Sabo 7%
Rick Santorum 100%
Paul Sarbanes 20%
Jim Saxton 80%
John Shadegg 100%
E. Clay Shaw, Jr. 93%
Christopher Shays 67%
Donald Sherwood 93%
Robert Ruhl Simmons 93%
Ike Skelton 47%
Gordon Smith 100%
Olympia Snowe 80%
Vic Snyder 53%
Hilda Solis 14%
Mark Souder 93%
Arlen Specter 93%
John Spratt, Jr. 27%
Pete Stark 7%
Cliff Stearns 93%
Ted Stevens 100%
Ted Strickland 20%
Bart Stupak 27%
John Sullivan 100%
John Sununu 100%
John Sweeney 87%
James Talent 100%
Tom Tancredo 93%
John Tanner 69%
Ellen Tauscher 40%
Charles Taylor 87%
Gene Taylor 53%
Craig Thomas 100%
William Thomas 93%
Todd Tiahrt 100%
Ed Towns 27%
Stephanie Tubbs Jones 27%
George Voinovich 87%
James Walsh 93%
Zach Wamp 87%
John Warner 100%
Diane Watson 27%
Mel Watt 33%
Anthony Weiner 33%
David Weldon 93%
W. Curtis Weldon 93%
Gerald Weller 100%
Robert Wexler 33%
Heather Wilson 87%
Lynn Woolsey 13%
David Wu 40%
Albert Wynn 60%
Bill Young 87%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top