| State | Office | District | Name | Party | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RI | U.S. House | 1 | David Cicilline | Democratic | 98% |
| RI | State House | 1 | Edith Ajello | Democratic | 91% |
| RI | State House | 3 | Thomas Palangio | Democratic | 75% |
| RI | State House | 4 | Gordon Fox | Democratic | 67% |
| RI | State House | 5 | John DeSimone | Democratic | 65% |
| RI | State House | 9 | Anastasia Williams | Democratic | 69% |
| RI | State House | 14 | Charlene Lima | Democratic | 93% |
| RI | State House | 16 | Peter Palumbo | Democratic | 72% |
| RI | State House | 17 | Robert Jacquard | Democratic | 64% |
| RI | State House | 19 | Joseph McNamara | Democratic | 72% |
| RI | State House | 21 | Eileen Naughton | Democratic | 64% |
| RI | State House | 33 | Donald Lally, Jr. | Democratic | 71% |
| RI | State House | 38 | Brian Kennedy | Democratic | 72% |
| RI | State House | 53 | Thomas Winfield | Democratic | 76% |
| RI | State House | 58 | William San Bento, Jr. | Democratic | 64% |
| RI | State House | 60 | Elaine Coderre | Democratic | 72% |
| RI | State Senate | 1 | Maryellen Goodwin | Democratic | 77% |
| RI | State Senate | 4 | Dominick Ruggerio | Democratic | 72% |
| RI | State Senate | 13 | M. Teresa Paiva-Weed | Democratic | 93% |
| RI | State Senate | 20 | Roger Picard | Democratic | 72% |
| RI | State Senate | 24 | Marc Cote | Democratic | 96% |
| RI | State Senate | 29 | Michael McCaffrey | Democratic | 91% |
| RI | State Senate | 30 | William Walaska | Democratic | 93% |
| RI | State Senate | 32 | David Bates | Republican | 91% |
| RI | State Senate | 38 | Dennis Algiere | Republican | 91% |
| RI | Attorney General | Peter Kilmartin | Democratic | 68% | |
| RI | Treasurer | Frank Caprio | Democratic | 88% | |
| Stephen Alves | 74% | ||||
| Mabel Anderson | 58% | ||||
| Stephen Anderson | 58% | ||||
| Roger Badeau | 94% | ||||
| Nancy Benoit | 84% | ||||
| Melvoid Benson | 75% | ||||
| Leo Blais | 79% | ||||
| Russell Bramley | 81% | ||||
| Barbara Burlingame | 84% | ||||
| Christine Callahan | 84% | ||||
| Bambilyn Breece Cambio | 68% | ||||
| Marsha Carpenter | 72% | ||||
| Kenneth Carter | 76% | ||||
| John Celona | 88% | ||||
| J. Clement Cicilline | 91% | ||||
| Thomas Coderre | 91% | ||||
| Raymond Coelho | 72% | ||||
| Steven Costantino | 72% | ||||
| Paul Crowley | 58% | ||||
| William Enos | 93% | ||||
| Joseph Faria | 68% | ||||
| Lawrence Ferguson | 50% | ||||
| Robert Flaherty | 64% | ||||
| Richard Fleury | 83% | ||||
| Michael Flynn | 86% | ||||
| Eugene Garvey | 72% | ||||
| Joanne Giannini | 72% | ||||
| June Gibbs | 88% | ||||
| Peter Ginaitt | 76% | ||||
| Cathy Graziano | 85% | ||||
| John Harwood | 64% | ||||
| Mark Barrett Heffner | 76% | ||||
| Suzanne Henseler | 65% | ||||
| Nancy Hetherington | 72% | ||||
| Edward Inman III | 72% | ||||
| William Irons | 91% | ||||
| Daniel Issa | 83% | ||||
| Thomas Izzo | 93% | ||||
| Leona Kelley | 91% | ||||
| Robert Kells | 72% | ||||
| Paul Kelly | 93% | ||||
| Beatrice Lanzi | 72% | ||||
| Charles John Lavesque | 65% | ||||
| J. Michael Lenihan | 85% | ||||
| Bruce Long | 100% | ||||
| Maria Lopes | 68% | ||||
| Robert Lowe | 56% | ||||
| Gerard Martineau | 39% | ||||
| John McBurney III | 74% | ||||
| John Joseph McCauley, Jr. | 71% | ||||
| Rene Menard | 76% | ||||
| Charles Millard, Jr. | 89% | ||||
| Joseph Montalbano | 68% | ||||
| Frank Montanaro | 76% | ||||
| Paul Moura | 75% | ||||
| William Murphy | 56% | ||||
| Mary Parella | 98% | ||||
| Rhoda Perry | 94% | ||||
| Antonio Pires | 72% | ||||
| Joan Quick | 67% | ||||
| Scott Rabideau | 67% | ||||
| Donald Reilly, Jr. | 65% | ||||
| John Revens, Jr. | 91% | ||||
| John Roney | 79% | ||||
| Henry Rose | 68% | ||||
| Alfred Russo, Jr. | 65% | ||||
| Eleanor Sasso | 91% | ||||
| Paul Sherlock | 71% | ||||
| John Simonian | 65% | ||||
| Thomas Slater | 53% | ||||
| Steven Smith | 76% | ||||
| Joseph Voccola | 67% | ||||
| Charles Walton | 67% | ||||
| Peter Wasylyk | 62% | ||||
| Robert Watson | 71% | ||||
| Timothy Williamson | 62% |
Issues:
Government Operations
How to Interpret these Evaluations
Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.
Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.
