Rating Group: Equality California

2010 Positions

State Office Name Party Rating
CA U.S. House-2 Jared Huffman D 100%
CA U.S. House-8 Paul Cook R 15%
CA U.S. House-10 Jeff Denham R 8%
CA U.S. House-26 Julia Brownley D 100%
CA U.S. House-35 Gloria Negrete McLeod D 100%
CA U.S. House-37 Karen Bass D 100%
CA U.S. House-47 Alan Lowenthal D 100%
CA State Assembly-2 Wesley Chesbro D 100%
CA State Assembly-3 Dan Logue R 8%
CA State Assembly-4 Mariko Yamada D 100%
CA State Assembly-15 Nancy Skinner D 100%
CA State Assembly-16 Joan Buchanan D 100%
CA State Assembly-17 Tom Ammiano D 100%
CA State Assembly-26 Connie Conway R 8%
CA State Assembly-28 Paul Fong D 100%
CA State Assembly-42 Brian Nestande R 15%
CA State Assembly-43 Mike Gatto D 100%
CA State Assembly-45 Bob Blumenfield D 100%
CA State Assembly-48 Roger Hernandez D 100%
CA State Assembly-53 John Pérez D 100%
CA State Assembly-55 Curt Hagman R 15%
CA State Assembly-56 V. Pérez D 92%
CA State Assembly-62 Steven Bradford D 100%
CA State Assembly-64 Isadore Hall III D 100%
CA State Assembly-70 Bonnie Lowenthal D 100%
CA State Assembly-73 Diane Harkey R 23%
CA State Senate-1 Ted Gaines R 8%
CA State Senate-2 Noreen Evans D 92%
CA State Senate-3 Lois Wolk D 100%
CA State Senate-4 Jim Nielsen R 15%
CA State Senate-5 Cathleen Galgiani D 92%
CA State Senate-6 Darrell Steinberg D 100%
CA State Senate-7 Mark DeSaulnier D 100%
CA State Senate-8 Leland Yee D 100%
CA State Senate-9 Loni Hancock D 100%
CA State Senate-10 Ellen Corbett D 100%
CA State Senate-11 Mark Leno D 100%
CA State Senate-13 Gerald Hill D 100%
CA State Senate-14 Thomas Berryhill R 8%
CA State Senate-15 James Beall, Jr. D 100%
CA State Senate-17 Bill Monning D 100%
CA State Senate-18 Jean Fuller R 8%
CA State Senate-20 Alex Padilla D 93%
CA State Senate-21 Stephen Knight R 8%
CA State Senate-22 Kevin de Leon D 100%
CA State Senate-23 Bill Emmerson R 8%
CA State Senate-25 Carol Liu D 93%
CA State Senate-26 Curren Price, Jr. D 100%
CA State Senate-27 Fran Pavley D 93%
CA State Senate-28 Ted Lieu D 100%
CA State Senate-29 Robert Huff R 14%
CA State Senate-30 Ron Calderon D 86%
CA State Senate-32 Norma Torres D 100%
CA State Senate-34 Lou Correa D 64%
CA State Senate-35 Roderick Wright D 100%
CA State Senate-36 Joel Anderson R 0%
CA State Senate-37 Mimi Walters R 7%
CA State Senate-38 Mark Wyland R 8%
CA State Senate-39 Martin Block D 100%
CA Insurance Commissioner Dave Jones D 100%
CA Supervisor-4 John Benoit Other 0%
CA Council Member-2 Paul Krekorian D 100%
CA Council Member-7 Felipe Fuentes D 100%
CA Council Member-At-Large David Cogdill R 7%
CA Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Torlakson Other 100%
Samuel Aanestad Other 14%
Anthony Adams Other 38%
Elaine Alquist Other 100%
Juan Arambula Other 92%
Roy Ashburn Other 86%
Bill Berryhill Other 8%
Sam Blakeslee Other 33%
Anna Caballero Other 85%
Charles Calderon Other 85%
Amina Carter Other 85%
Gilbert Cedillo Other 100%
Joe Coto Other 100%
Dave Cox Other 0%
Mike Davis Other 85%
Hector De La Torre Other 100%
Charles DeVore Other 23%
Denise Ducheny Other 100%
Robert Dutton Other 7%
Michael Duvall Other 0%
Mike Eng Other 100%
Mike Feuer Other 100%
Nathan Fletcher Other 54%
Dean Florez Other 93%
Warren Furutani Other 100%
Martin Garrick Other 8%
Danny Gilmore Other 25%
Tom Harman Other 11%
Mary Hayashi Other 100%
Dennis Hollingsworth Other 8%
Alyson Huber Other 92%
Kevin Jeffries Other 23%
Christine Kehoe Other 100%
Fiona Ma Other 100%
Abel Maldonado Other 0%
Tony Mendoza Other 100%
Jeff Miller Other 8%
Pedro Nava Other 100%
Roger Niello Other 23%
Chris Norby Other 9%
Jenny Oropeza Other 100%
Anthony Portantino, Jr. Other 100%
Gloria Romero Other 100%
George Runner, Jr. Other 7%
Ira Ruskin Other 100%
Mary Salas Other 100%
Lori Saldaña Other 100%
Jim Silva Other 8%
Saren Simitian Other 100%
Cameron Smyth Other 8%
Jose Solorio Other 100%
Tony Strickland Other 7%
Audra Strickland Other 15%
Sandré Swanson Other 100%
Alberto Torrico Other 100%
Van Tran Other 23%
Mike Villines Other 23%
Patricia Wiggins Other 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.