Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: California Republican Assembly

2011 Positions

Issues: Conservative
State Office District Name Party Rating
CA U.S. House 1 Doug LaMalfa Republican 89%
CA U.S. House 2 Jared Huffman Democratic 6%
CA U.S. House 8 Paul Cook Republican 75%
CA U.S. House 11 Mark DeSaulnier Democratic 11%
CA U.S. House 21 David Valadao Republican 82%
CA U.S. House 25 Steve Knight Republican 94%
CA U.S. House 26 Julia Brownley Democratic 11%
CA U.S. House 33 Ted Lieu Democratic 11%
CA U.S. House 35 Norma Torres Democratic 6%
CA U.S. House 45 Mimi Walters Republican 82%
CA U.S. House 46 Lou Correa Democratic 63%
CA U.S. House 47 Alan Lowenthal Democratic 11%
CA U.S. House 51 Juan Vargas Democratic 11%
CA State Senate 1 Ted Gaines Republican 93%
CA State Senate 4 Jim Nielsen Republican 94%
CA State Senate 5 Cathleen Galgiani Democratic 17%
CA State Senate 6 Richard Pan Democratic 6%
CA State Senate 8 Tom Berryhill Republican 69%
CA State Senate 9 Nancy Skinner Democratic 6%
CA State Senate 10 Bob Wieckowski Democratic 6%
CA State Senate 12 Anthony Cannella Republican 67%
CA State Senate 13 Gerald Hill Democratic 17%
CA State Senate 15 Jim Beall, Jr. Democratic 6%
CA State Senate 16 Jean Fuller Republican 76%
CA State Senate 17 Bill Monning Democratic 6%
CA State Senate 22 Ed Hernandez Democratic 11%
CA State Senate 23 Mike Morrell Republican 94%
CA State Senate 24 Kevin de Leon Democratic 11%
CA State Senate 25 Anthony Portantino, Jr. Democratic 11%
CA State Senate 30 Holly Mitchell Democratic 11%
CA State Senate 32 Tony Mendoza Democratic 0%
CA State Senate 33 Ricardo Lara Democratic 6%
CA State Senate 35 Steven Bradford Democratic 6%
CA State Senate 38 Joel Anderson Republican 94%
CA State Senate 39 Toni Atkins Democratic 11%
CA State Senate 40 Ben Hueso Democratic 11%
CA Secretary of State Alex Padilla Democratic 6%
CA Mayor At-Large Darrell Steinberg Democratic 11%
CA Mayor At-Large Don Wagner 94%
CA Supervisor 1 Kevin Jeffries 87%
CA Supervisor 4 Curt Hagman 82%
CA Supervisor 5 Joe Simitian No Party Affiliation 11%
CA Council Member 1 Gilbert Cedillo 11%
CA Council Member 3 Bob Blumenfield 6%
CA Council Member 7 Felipe Fuentes 11%
CA Council Member 9 Curren Price, Jr. 11%
Katcho Achadjian 72%
Luis Alejo 0%
Michael Allen 11%
Elaine Alquist 6%
Tom Ammiano 6%
Bill Berryhill 75%
Sam Blakeslee 67%
Martin Block 6%
Susan Bonilla 6%
Joan Buchanan 11%
Betsy Butler 6%
Charles Calderon 11%
Ron Calderon 11%
Nora Campos 6%
Amina Carter 6%
Wesley Chesbro 6%
Connie Conway 78%
Ellen Corbett 6%
Mike Davis 6%
Roger Dickinson 6%
Tim Donnelly 94%
Robert Dutton 89%
Bill Emmerson 67%
Mike Eng 6%
Noreen Evans 11%
Mike Feuer 11%
Nathan Fletcher 56%
Paul Fong 6%
Warren Furutani 6%
Beth Gaines 94%
Martin Garrick 82%
Mike Gatto 28%
Richard Gordon 17%
Shannon Grove 94%
Linda Halderman 100%
Isadore Hall III 11%
Loni Hancock 6%
Diane Harkey 94%
Tom Harman 85%
Mary Hayashi 6%
Roger Hernandez 6%
Alyson Huber 44%
Robert Huff 82%
Brian Jones 88%
Christine Kehoe 11%
Mark Leno 6%
Carol Liu 11%
Dan Logue 94%
Bonnie Lowenthal 11%
Fiona Ma 11%
Allan Mansoor 100%
Jeff Miller 76%
Gloria Negrete McLeod 22%
Brian Nestande 76%
Chris Norby 88%
Kristin Olsen 82%
Fran Pavley 17%
Henry Perea 22%
John Pérez 6%
Manuel Pérez 0%
Michael Rubio 28%
Sharon Runner 87%
Jim Silva 88%
Cameron Smyth 76%
Jose Solorio 6%
Tony Strickland 78%
Sandré Swanson 0%
Das Williams 6%
Lois Wolk 17%
Roderick Wright 33%
Mark Wyland 89%
Mariko Yamada 6%
Leland Yee 6%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top