Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: California Republican Assembly

2010 Positions

Issues: Conservative
State Office District Name Party Rating
CA U.S. House 2 Jared Huffman Democratic 0%
CA U.S. House 8 Paul Cook Republican 69%
CA U.S. House 10 Jeff Denham Republican 100%
CA U.S. House 11 Mark DeSaulnier Democratic 0%
CA U.S. House 25 Steve Knight Republican 99%
CA U.S. House 26 Julia Brownley Democratic 0%
CA U.S. House 33 Ted Lieu Democratic 6%
CA U.S. House 35 Norma Torres Democratic 0%
CA U.S. House 37 Karen Bass Democratic 0%
CA U.S. House 45 Mimi Walters Republican 100%
CA U.S. House 47 Alan Lowenthal Democratic 0%
CA State Assembly 43 Mike Gatto Democratic 6%
CA State Assembly 48 Roger Hernandez Democratic 0%
CA State Senate 1 Ted Gaines Republican 81%
CA State Senate 3 Lois Wolk Democratic 12%
CA State Senate 4 Jim Nielsen Republican 76%
CA State Senate 5 Cathleen Galgiani Democratic 12%
CA State Senate 8 Tom Berryhill Republican 92%
CA State Senate 9 Loni Hancock Democratic 0%
CA State Senate 11 Mark Leno Democratic 0%
CA State Senate 13 Gerald Hill Democratic 6%
CA State Senate 15 James Beall, Jr. Democratic 0%
CA State Senate 16 Jean Fuller Republican 87%
CA State Senate 17 Bill Monning Democratic 0%
CA State Senate 24 Kevin de Leon Democratic 0%
CA State Senate 25 Carol Liu Democratic 0%
CA State Senate 27 Fran Pavley Democratic 0%
CA State Senate 29 Robert Huff Republican 88%
CA State Senate 32 Tony Mendoza Democratic 6%
CA State Senate 35 Isadore Hall III Democratic 0%
CA State Senate 38 Joel Anderson Republican 94%
CA State Senate 39 Martin Block Democratic 0%
CA Secretary of State Alex Padilla Democratic 6%
CA Insurance Commissioner Dave Jones Democratic 0%
CA Supervisor 1 Kevin Jeffries Republican 81%
CA Supervisor 5 Saren Simitian Democratic 0%
CA Council Member 1 Gilbert Cedillo No Party Affiliation 0%
CA Council Member 3 Bob Blumenfield No Party Affiliation 0%
CA Council Member 6 David Cogdill Republican 100%
CA Council Member 7 Felipe Fuentes No Party Affiliation 0%
CA Council Member 9 Curren Price, Jr. No Party Affiliation 6%
CA State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Torlakson Non-partisan 0%
CA State Board of Equalization Diane Harkey Republican 93%
CA State Board of Equalization Fiona Ma Democratic 0%
Anthony Adams 88%
Elaine Alquist 0%
Tom Ammiano 0%
Juan Arambula 0%
Roy Ashburn 82%
Bill Berryhill 69%
Sam Blakeslee 53%
Steven Bradford 0%
Joan Buchanan 0%
Anna Caballero 18%
Charles Calderon 0%
Ron Calderon 12%
Amina Carter 0%
Wesley Chesbro 0%
Connie Conway 81%
Ellen Corbett 0%
Lou Correa 35%
Joe Coto 0%
Mike Davis 0%
Hector De La Torre 0%
Charles DeVore 100%
Denise Ducheny 12%
Robert Dutton 88%
Bill Emmerson 67%
Mike Eng 0%
Noreen Evans 0%
Mike Feuer 0%
Nathan Fletcher 63%
Dean Florez 6%
Paul Fong 0%
Warren Furutani 0%
Martin Garrick 82%
Danny Gilmore 80%
Curt Hagman 88%
Tom Harman 81%
Mary Hayashi 0%
Dennis Hollingsworth 93%
Alyson Huber 24%
Christine Kehoe 0%
Dan Logue 94%
Bonnie Lowenthal 0%
Jeff Miller 82%
Pedro Nava 6%
Gloria Negrete McLeod 12%
Brian Nestande 76%
Roger Niello 82%
Chris Norby 92%
Jenny Oropeza 0%
John Pérez 0%
Manuel Pérez 0%
Chris Peterson 97%
Anthony Portantino, Jr. 0%
Gloria Romero 6%
Ira Ruskin 0%
Mary Salas 0%
Lori Saldaña 0%
Jim Silva 87%
Nancy Skinner 0%
Cameron Smyth 94%
Jose Solorio 0%
Darrell Steinberg 0%
Tony Strickland 92%
Audra Strickland 85%
Sandré Swanson 0%
Alberto Torrico 12%
Van Tran 93%
Mike Villines 69%
Patricia Wiggins 0%
Roderick Wright 18%
Mark Wyland 84%
Mariko Yamada 6%
Leland Yee 6%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top