Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME)

2009 Positions

Issues: Labor Unions
State Office District Name Party Rating
Neil Abercrombie 100%
Gary Ackerman 100%
John Adler 78%
Daniel Akaka, Sr. 100%
Todd Akin 0%
Rodney Alexander 22%
Jason Altmire 89%
Rob Andrews 100%
Michael Arcuri 89%
Steve Austria 33%
Joe Baca, Sr. 100%
Michele Bachmann 0%
Spencer Bachus 0%
Brian Baird 89%
J. Gresham Barrett 0%
John Barrow 89%
Roscoe Bartlett 11%
Max Baucus 91%
Evan Bayh 82%
Melissa Bean 89%
Mark Begich 100%
Bob Bennett 9%
Shelley Berkley 100%
Howard Berman 100%
Marion Berry 88%
Judy Biggert 22%
Brian Bilbray 22%
Jeff Bingaman 100%
Tim Bishop 100%
John Boccieri 89%
Kit Bond 18%
Jo Bonner, Jr. 22%
Mary Bono Mack 33%
Dan Boren 56%
Leonard Boswell 89%
Rick Boucher 86%
Allen Boyd, Jr. 67%
Bruce Braley 89%
Bobby Bright 33%
Paul Broun 0%
Henry Brown, Jr. 11%
Ginny Brown-Waite 13%
Jim Bunning 0%
Roland Burris 100%
Dan Burton 11%
Steve Buyer 22%
Robert Byrd 90%
Dave Camp 13%
John Campbell III 11%
Eric Cantor 0%
Joseph Cao 67%
Dennis Cardoza 100%
Russ Carnahan 100%
Christopher Carney 100%
Mike Castle 56%
Saxby Chambliss 9%
Ben Chandler III 89%
Travis Childers 67%
Howard Coble 11%
Thomas Coburn 0%
Kent Conrad 100%
Jerry Costello 100%
Kathy Dahlkemper 100%
Artur Davis 89%
Geoff Davis 22%
Lincoln Davis 89%
Bill Delahunt 100%
James DeMint 0%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 56%
Norm Dicks 100%
John Dingell 100%
Chris Dodd 100%
Byron Dorgan 91%
David Dreier 11%
Steve Driehaus 89%
Chet Edwards 78%
Vern Ehlers 22%
Brad Ellsworth 89%
Jo Ann Emerson 33%
John Ensign 0%
Bob Etheridge 100%
Russ Feingold 91%
Bob Filner 100%
Barney Frank 100%
Elton Gallegly 13%
Jim Gerlach 44%
Gabrielle Giffords 100%
Phil Gingrey 11%
Charlie Gonzalez 100%
Bart Gordon 89%
Judd Gregg 20%
Parker Griffith, Jr. 44%
Kay Hagan 100%
John Hall 100%
Ralph Hall 11%
Debbie Halvorson 100%
Phil Hare 100%
Tom Harkin 100%
Jane Harman 100%
Doc Hastings 0%
Wally Herger, Jr. 11%
Stephanie Herseth Sandlin 75%
Baron Hill 89%
Maurice Hinchey 100%
Paul Hodes 78%
Pete Hoekstra 22%
Thomas Holden 89%
Rush Holt, Jr. 100%
Kay Hutchison 27%
Bob Inglis, Sr. 11%
Daniel Inouye 100%
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 100%
Mike Johanns 11%
Timothy Johnson 91%
Tim Johnson 44%
Steve Kagen 100%
Paul Kanjorski 89%
Ted Kaufman 100%
Edward Kennedy, Sr. 100%
Patrick Kennedy 100%
Dale Kildee 100%
Carolyn Kilpatrick 100%
Mary Jo Kilroy 100%
Jack Kingston 22%
Paul Kirk, Jr. 100%
Larry Kissell 89%
Ron Klein 100%
Herb Kohl 100%
Suzanne Kosmas 67%
Frank Kratovil, Jr. 78%
Dennis Kucinich 89%
Jon Kyl 0%
Mary Landrieu 91%
Tom Latham 22%
Steve LaTourette 44%
Frank Lautenberg 100%
Chris Lee 33%
George LeMieux 0%
Carl Levin 100%
Jerry Lewis 22%
Joe Lieberman 100%
Blanche Lincoln 82%
John Linder 0%
Dick Lugar 27%
Dan Lungren 11%
Connie Mack IV 0%
Dan Maffei 100%
Don Manzullo 11%
Betsy Markey 67%
Jim Marshall 78%
Melquiades Martinez 38%
Eric Massa 89%
Jim Matheson 67%
Carolyn McCarthy 100%
Thaddeus McCotter 33%
John McHugh 50%
Mike McIntyre 89%
Buck McKeon 11%
Michael McMahon 89%
Kendrick Meek, Sr. 100%
Charlie Melancon, Sr. 67%
Mike Michaud 100%
Gary Miller 13%
George Miller 100%
Brad Miller 100%
Walt Minnick 44%
Harry Mitchell 89%
Alan Mollohan 100%
Dennis Moore 100%
Jim Moran, Jr. 89%
Patrick Murphy 89%
Scott Murphy 75%
Jack Murtha 100%
Sue Myrick 11%
Ben Nelson 82%
Glenn Nye III 67%
Jim Oberstar 100%
Dave Obey 100%
John Olver 100%
Solomon Ortiz, Sr. 100%
Bill Owens 100%
Ed Pastor 100%
Ron Paul 0%
Donald Payne 100%
Tom Perriello 89%
Tom Petri 33%
Todd Platts 44%
Earl Pomeroy 89%
Mark Pryor 91%
George Radanovich 0%
Nick Rahall II 100%
Denny Rehberg 33%
Silvestre Reyes 100%
Laura Richardson 100%
Jay Rockefeller IV 100%
Ciro Rodriguez 100%
Mike Rogers 25%
Mike Ross 78%
Steve Rothman 100%
John Salazar 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top