| State | Office | Name | Party | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UT | State House-36 | Patrice Arent | D | 100% |
| UT | State House-53 | Melvin Brown | R | 44% |
| UT | State Senate-3 | Gene Davis | D | 100% |
| UT | State Senate-6 | Wayne Harper | R | 56% |
| UT | State Senate-11 | Howard Stephenson | R | 67% |
| UT | State Senate-14 | John Valentine | R | 56% |
| UT | State Senate-15 | Margaret Dayton | R | 44% |
| UT | State Senate-17 | Peter Knudson | R | 100% |
| UT | State Senate-25 | Lyle Hillyard | R | 89% |
| UT | Attorney General | John Swallow | R | 33% |
| UT | Commissioner of Agriculture | Leonard Blackham | Other | 56% |
| UT | Mayor-At-Large | Ralph Becker | Other | 100% |
| UT | Council Member-At-Large | David Ure | R | 33% |
| UT | Council Member-North | Craig Buttars | R | 56% |
| Gerry Adair | Other | 67% | ||
| Jeff Alexander | Other | 33% | ||
| Brian Allen | Other | 78% | ||
| Sheryl Allen | Other | 89% | ||
| Eli Anderson | Other | 89% | ||
| John Arrington | Other | 89% | ||
| Loretta Baca | Other | 89% | ||
| Steve Barth | Other | 78% | ||
| Lane Beattie | Other | 89% | ||
| Trisha Beck | Other | 89% | ||
| Ron Bigelow | Other | 67% | ||
| Duane Bourdeaux | Other | 100% | ||
| DeMar Bowman | Other | 56% | ||
| Afton Bradshaw | Other | 89% | ||
| Katherine Bryson | Other | 22% | ||
| Perry Buckner | Other | 100% | ||
| Judy Ann Buffmire | Other | 89% | ||
| David Buhler | Other | 100% | ||
| Don Bush | Other | 67% | ||
| Mary Carlson | Other | 78% | ||
| Orville Carnahan | Other | 78% | ||
| Blake Chard | Other | 44% | ||
| Gary Cox | Other | 100% | ||
| Greg Curtis | Other | 67% | ||
| Marda Dillree | Other | 56% | ||
| Mike Dmitrich | Other | 89% | ||
| Beverly Ann Evans | Other | 78% | ||
| R. Mont Evans | Other | 44% | ||
| Christine Fox-Finlinson | Other | 67% | ||
| Lloyd Frandsen | Other | 89% | ||
| Kevin Garn | Other | 67% | ||
| David Gladwell | Other | 89% | ||
| Brent Goodfellow | Other | 100% | ||
| James Gowans | Other | 67% | ||
| Thomas Hatch | Other | 56% | ||
| J. Brent Haymond | Other | 78% | ||
| Neal Hendrickson | Other | 89% | ||
| John Hickman | Other | 33% | ||
| Dave Hogue | Other | 89% | ||
| Bryan Holladay | Other | 100% | ||
| John Holmgren | Other | 89% | ||
| Scott Howell | Other | 100% | ||
| Joseph Hull | Other | 78% | ||
| Dennis Iverson | Other | 11% | ||
| Bradley Johnson | Other | 44% | ||
| Keele Johnson | Other | 56% | ||
| David Jones | Other | 100% | ||
| Lorin Jones | Other | 89% | ||
| Robert H.M. Killpack | Other | 67% | ||
| Brad King | Other | 89% | ||
| Susan Koehn | Other | 78% | ||
| Patricia Larson | Other | 78% | ||
| L. Alma Mansell | Other | 89% | ||
| George Mantes | Other | 89% | ||
| Ed Mayne | Other | 89% | ||
| LeRay McAllister | Other | 89% | ||
| Robert Montgomery | Other | 89% | ||
| Robert Muhlestein | Other | 78% | ||
| Joseph Murray | Other | 78% | ||
| Alarik Myrin | Other | 89% | ||
| Lowell Allen Nelson | Other | 56% | ||
| Swen Nielsen | Other | 56% | ||
| Howard Nielson | Other | 78% | ||
| Evan Olsen | Other | 44% | ||
| Loraine Pace | Other | 67% | ||
| Craig Peterson | Other | 89% | ||
| Millie Peterson | Other | 89% | ||
| L. Steven Poulton | Other | 78% | ||
| Tammy Rowan | Other | 44% | ||
| Carl Saunders | Other | 89% | ||
| Jack Seitz | Other | 67% | ||
| Raymond Short | Other | 67% | ||
| Richard Siddoway | Other | 100% | ||
| David Steele | Other | 100% | ||
| Robert Steiner | Other | 67% | ||
| Martin Stephens | Other | 44% | ||
| Nora Thurgood Stephens | Other | 56% | ||
| Michael Styler | Other | 89% | ||
| Pete Suazo | Other | 78% | ||
| Jordan Tanner | Other | 89% | ||
| Nathan Tanner | Other | 44% | ||
| Craig Taylor | Other | 22% | ||
| Daniel Tuttle | Other | 100% | ||
| A. Lamont Tyler | Other | 100% | ||
| Michael Waddoups | Other | 100% | ||
| Richard Walsh | Other | 56% | ||
| Glenn Way | Other | 44% | ||
| Blaze Wharton | Other | 78% | ||
| Bill Wright | Other | 44% | ||
| David Zolman, Sr. | Other | 56% |
How to Interpret these Evaluations
Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.
Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.