Rating Group: Wisconsin Right to Life

2007-2008 Positions on Pro-Life Policy

Issues: Abortion
State Office Name Party Rating
WI U.S. House-2 Mark Pocan D 0
WI U.S. House-6 Glenn Grothman R 100
WI State Assembly-3 Alvin Ott R 100
WI State Assembly-6 Gary Tauchen R 100
WI State Assembly-9 Josh Zepnick D 0
WI State Assembly-12 Frederick Kessler D 0
WI State Assembly-16 Leon Young D 0
WI State Assembly-20 Christine Sinicki D 0
WI State Assembly-23 Jim Ott R 100
WI State Assembly-29 John Murtha R 100
WI State Assembly-36 Jeffrey Mursau R 100
WI State Assembly-38 Joel Kleefisch R 100
WI State Assembly-40 Kevin Petersen R 100
WI State Assembly-41 Joan Ballweg R 100
WI State Assembly-43 Andy Jorgensen D 67
WI State Assembly-46 Gary Hebl D 0
WI State Assembly-54 Gordon Hintz D 40
WI State Assembly-61 Samantha Kerkman R 100
WI State Assembly-63 Robin Vos R 100
WI State Assembly-66 Cory Mason D 33
WI State Assembly-77 Terese Berceau D 0
WI State Assembly-80 Sondy Pope D 0
WI State Assembly-89 John Nygren R 100
WI State Assembly-96 Lee Nerison R 100
WI State Senate-1 Frank Lasee R 100
WI State Senate-2 Robert Cowles R 67
WI State Senate-3 Timothy Carpenter D 0
WI State Senate-4 Lena Taylor D 0
WI State Senate-5 Leah Vukmir R 100
WI State Senate-8 Alberta Darling R 67
WI State Senate-10 Sheila Harsdorf R 67
WI State Senate-11 Stephen Nass R 100
WI State Senate-13 Scott Fitzgerald R 100
WI State Senate-14 Luther Olsen R 67
WI State Senate-16 Mark Miller D 0
WI State Senate-19 Roger Roth, Jr. R 100
WI State Senate-22 Robert Wirch D 0
WI State Senate-23 Terry Moulton R 100
WI State Senate-24 Julie Lassa D 0
WI State Senate-26 Fred Risser D 0
WI State Senate-27 Jon Erpenbach D 0
WI State Senate-28 Mary Lazich R 100
WI State Senate-29 Jerry Petrowski R 100
WI State Senate-30 Dave Hansen D 0
WI State Senate-31 Kathleen Vinehout D 25
WI State Senate-32 Jennifer Shilling D 0
WI Public Service Commission Chair Phil Montgomery 100
WI Railroad Commissioner Jeffrey Plale D 0
WI Secretary of Transportation Mark Gottlieb R 100
Sheryl Albers 100
Chuck Benedict 0
Garey Bies 100
Spencer Black 0
Frank Boyle 0
Roger Breske 0
G. Spencer Coggs 0
Pedro Colon 0
David Cullen 33
Brett Davis 100
Russell Decker 0
Michael Ellis 67
Jason Fields 0
Jeff Fitzgerald 100
Donald Friske 100
Phil Garthwaite 0
Tamara Grigsby 0
Barbara Gronemus 0
Scott Gunderson 100
Mark Gundrum 100
Eugene Hahn 100
Steve Hilgenberg 0
J.A. Hines 100
Kim Hixson 33
Mark Honadel 100
Ann Hraychuck 33
Mary Hubler 67
Michael Huebsch 100
Robert Jauch 0
Suzanne Jeskewitz 100
Theodore Kanavas 100
Dan Kapanke 67
Dean Kaufert 100
Neal Kedzie 100
Steven Kestell 100
Bill Kramer 100
Pat Kreitlow 0
James Kreuser 0
Margaret Krusick 100
Alan Lasee 67
John Lehman 0
Joseph Leibham 100
Daniel LeMahieu 100
Thomas Lothian 100
Dan Meyer 100
Louis Molepske, Jr. 33
Terry Musser 100
Tom Nelson 33
Scott Newcomer 100
Carol Owens 100
Joseph Parisi 0
Don Pridemore 100
Kitty Rhoades 100
Jon Richards 0
Judith Robson 0
Carol Roessler 100
Marlin Schneider 33
Dale Schultz 67
Donna Seidel 0
Mike Sheridan 0
Gary Sherman 0
Jeffrey Smith 0
James Soletski 0
Tony Staskunas 100
John Steinbrink 0
Jeffrey Stone 100
Pat Strachota 100
Scott Suder 100
Jim Sullivan 0
Barbara Toles 0
John Townsend 100
David Travis 0
Robert Turner 0
Terry Van Akkeren 67
Karl Van Roy 100
Amy Vruwink 0
Sheldon Wasserman 0
Steve Wieckert 100
Annette Williams 100
Mary Williams 100
Jeffrey Wood 100
Robert Ziegelbauer 100
Rich Zipperer 100

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.