Rating Group: Wisconsin Right to Life

2003-2004 Positions

Issues: Abortion
State Office Name Party Rating
WI U.S. House-2 Mark Pocan D 13%
WI U.S. House-4 Gwen Moore D 40%
WI State Assembly-1 Garey Bies R 100%
WI State Assembly-3 Alvin Ott R 100%
WI State Assembly-9 Josh Zepnick D 13%
WI State Assembly-16 Leon Young D 13%
WI State Assembly-19 Jon Richards D 13%
WI State Assembly-20 Christine Sinicki D 11%
WI State Assembly-27 Steven Kestell R 100%
WI State Assembly-33 Stephen Nass R 100%
WI State Assembly-55 Dean Kaufert R 100%
WI State Assembly-59 Daniel LeMahieu R 100%
WI State Assembly-70 Amy Vruwink D 13%
WI State Assembly-77 Terese Berceau D 11%
WI State Assembly-80 Sondy Pope D 13%
WI State Assembly-87 Mary Williams R 100%
WI State Senate-1 Frank Lasee R 100%
WI State Senate-2 Robert Cowles R 80%
WI State Senate-3 Timothy Carpenter D 44%
WI State Senate-4 Lena Taylor D 13%
WI State Senate-5 Leah Vukmir R 100%
WI State Senate-8 Alberta Darling R 100%
WI State Senate-9 Joseph Leibham R 100%
WI State Senate-10 Sheila Harsdorf R 100%
WI State Senate-13 Scott Fitzgerald R 100%
WI State Senate-14 Luther Olsen R 100%
WI State Senate-16 Mark Miller D 13%
WI State Senate-17 Dale Schultz R 100%
WI State Senate-19 Michael Ellis R 100%
WI State Senate-20 Glenn Grothman R 100%
WI State Senate-21 John Lehman D 13%
WI State Senate-22 Robert Wirch D 40%
WI State Senate-24 Julie Lassa D 40%
WI State Senate-25 Robert Jauch D 33%
WI State Senate-26 Fred Risser D 40%
WI State Senate-27 Jon Erpenbach D 40%
WI State Senate-28 Mary Lazich R 100%
WI State Senate-29 Jerry Petrowski R 100%
WI State Senate-30 Dave Hansen D 40%
WI State Senate-32 Jennifer Shilling D 13%
WI Supervisor-10 John Ainsworth 75%
WI Supervisor-13 Joe Plouff 13%
WI Public Service Commission Chair Phil Montgomery 100%
WI Railroad Commissioner Jeffrey Plale D 80%
WI Secretary of Transportation Mark Gottlieb R 100%
Sheryl Albers 100%
Larry Balow 13%
Spencer Black 13%
Frank Boyle 13%
Roger Breske 100%
Ron Brown 83%
Charles Chvala 17%
G. Spencer Coggs 25%
Pedro Colon 13%
David Cullen 10%
Russell Decker 40%
Jeff Fitzgerald 100%
Steven Foti 100%
Stephen Freese 100%
Donald Friske 89%
John Gard 100%
Curt Gielow 100%
Barbara Gronemus 13%
Scott Gunderson 100%
Mark Gundrum 100%
Eugene Hahn 100%
Tom Hebl 11%
J.A. Hines 100%
Mark Honadel 100%
Gregory Huber 13%
Mary Hubler 13%
Michael Huebsch 100%
Jean Hundertmark 100%
Scott Richard Jensen 100%
Suzanne Jeskewitz 50%
DuWayne Johnsrud 38%
Theodore Kanavas 100%
Neal Kedzie 100%
Judy Krawczyk 100%
Robin Kreibich 100%
James Kreuser 13%
Shirley Krug 13%
Margaret Krusick 78%
Bonnie Ladwig 88%
Alan Lasee 100%
Michael Lehman 100%
Gabe Loeffelholz 100%
Thomas Lothian 100%
Terri McCormick 100%
Dan Meyer 100%
Mark Meyer 40%
Louis Molepske, Jr. 100%
Johnnie Morris 13%
Terry Musser 75%
Ann Nischke 100%
Carol Owens 100%
Mary Panzer 100%
Mark Pettis 100%
Michael Powers 63%
Tom Reynolds 100%
Kitty Rhoades 75%
Judith Robson 33%
Carol Roessler 100%
Marlin Schneider 13%
Dan Schooff 13%
Lorraine Seratti 100%
Gary Sherman 13%
Tony Staskunas 100%
John Steinbrink 14%
Cathy Stepp 100%
Jeffrey Stone 100%
Scott Suder 100%
Debra Towns 100%
John Townsend 100%
David Travis 13%
Robert Turner 13%
Gregg Underheim 88%
Terry Van Akkeren 22%
Karl Van Roy 100%
Daniel Vrakas 100%
David Ward 88%
Sheldon Wasserman 13%
Becky Weber 100%
Robert Welch 100%
Steve Wieckert 100%
Annette Williams 13%
Jeffrey Wood 100%
Wayne Wood 100%
Robert Ziegelbauer 100%
David Zien 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.