or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Sportsmen and Animal Owner's Voting Alliance

2004 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Jon Porter, Sr. 25%
Deborah Pryce 0%
George Radanovich 100%
James Ramstad 0%
Ralph Regula 25%
Denny Rehberg 100%
Richard Renzi 100%
Silvestre Reyes 0%
Thomas Reynolds 100%
Bill Richardson 0%
Mike Ross 100%
Steve Rothman 0%
Jim Ryun 100%
Martin Olav Sabo 0%
William Sali 100%
Rick Santorum 0%
Jim Saxton 0%
John Shadegg 100%
Christopher Shays 0%
Donald Sherwood 100%
Robert Ruhl Simmons 0%
Ike Skelton 100%
Olympia Snowe 0%
Vic Snyder 0%
Mike Sodrel 100%
Hilda Solis 0%
Mark Souder 100%
John Spratt, Jr. 0%
Pete Stark 0%
Cliff Stearns 100%
Bart Stupak 25%
John Sullivan 100%
John Sweeney 0%
Jim Talent 100%
John Tanner 100%
Ellen Tauscher 0%
Charles Taylor 100%
Gene Taylor 0%
Craig Thomas 100%
Todd Tiahrt 100%
Ed Towns 0%
Stephanie Tubbs Jones 0%
George Voinovich 100%
James Walsh 100%
Zach Wamp 100%
Diane Watson 0%
Mel Watt 0%
Anthony Weiner 0%
David Weldon 100%
W. Curtis Weldon 0%
Gerald Weller 0%
Robert Wexler 0%
Heather Wilson 100%
Lynn Woolsey 0%
David Wu 0%
Albert Wynn 0%
Bill Young 25%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top