State Office Name Party Rating
MS U.S. House-1 Alan Nunnelee R 78%
MS State House-7 Wanda Jennings R 74%
MS State House-10 H. Nolan Mettetal R 71%
MS State House-16 Stephen Holland D 66%
MS State House-27 Ferr Smith D 30%
MS State House-29 Linda Coleman D 35%
MS State House-30 Robert Huddleston D 38%
MS State House-31 Sara Thomas D 49%
MS State House-32 Willie Perkins, Sr. D 30%
MS State House-33 Thomas Reynolds II D 54%
MS State House-38 Tyrone Ellis D 34%
MS State House-39 Jeffrey Smith R 74%
MS State House-42 Reecy Dickson D 29%
MS State House-45 Bennett Malone D 37%
MS State House-46 Bobby Howell R 88%
MS State House-49 Willie Bailey D 27%
MS State House-51 Rufus Straughter D 23%
MS State House-53 Robert Moak D 28%
MS State House-57 Edward Blackmon, Jr. D 39%
MS State House-58 Rita Martinson R 83%
MS State House-60 John Moore R 87%
MS State House-61 Ray Rogers R 73%
MS State House-62 Thomas Weathersby, Sr. R 72%
MS State House-64 William Denny, Jr. R 91%
MS State House-65 Mary Coleman D 65%
MS State House-67 Earle Banks D 27%
MS State House-69 Alyce Clarke D 39%
MS State House-70 James Evans D 16%
MS State House-79 Blaine Eaton II D 48%
MS State House-85 America Middleton D 29%
MS State House-87 Johnny Stringer D 66%
MS State House-89 C. Shows R 79%
MS State House-90 Joseph Warren D 64%
MS State House-94 Robert Johnson III D 41%
MS State House-98 David Myers D 36%
MS State House-103 Percy Watson D 15%
MS State House-106 Herbert Frierson R 65%
MS State House-108 Mark Formby R 91%
MS State House-112 John Read R 71%
MS State Senate-3 Nickey Browning R 74%
MS State Senate-7 Hob Bryan D 51%
MS State Senate-9 Gray Tollison R 48%
MS State Senate-13 Willie Simmons D 47%
MS State Senate-14 Lydia Chassaniol R 76%
MS State Senate-24 David Jordan D 17%
MS State Senate-26 John Horhn D 21%
MS State Senate-27 Hillman Frazier D 19%
MS State Senate-30 Dean Kirby R 88%
MS State Senate-31 Terry Burton R 81%
MS State Senate-32 Sampson Jackson II D 33%
MS State Senate-50 Tommy Gollott R 65%
MS Supervisor-3 Dirk Dedeaux D 43%
MS Public Service Commissioner Lynn Posey R 60%
Jim Crawley Barnett 71%
Lester Barnett, Jr. 91%
Barbara Martin Blackmon 28%
William Bowles 62%
Billy Broomfield 35%
Thomas Cameron III 89%
William Ward Canon 94%
Charles Wilson Capps, Jr. 89%
Neely Carlton 39%
Robert Clark, Jr. 46%
Joseph Compretta 67%
Scottie Cuevas 36%
Ricky Cummings 43%
Lee Jarrell Davis 80%
Bob Dearing 74%
George Dickerson 47%
James Ellington 93%
Joe Ellzey 76%
Ronald David Farris 73%
George Flaggs, Jr. 57%
Timothy Alan Ford 87%
Jamie Franks, Jr. 42%
Frances Fredericks 36%
Vernon Delma Furniss 21%
Jack Gadd 57%
David Gibbs 48%
Carl Gordon, Jr. 57%
David Green 32%
Joe Grist, Jr. 39%
Daniel Guice, Jr. 80%
Edwin Glenn Hamilton 85%
Frank Hamilton 81%
Alice Harden 18%
Clayton Henderson 50%
William Hewes III 85%
Tommy Horne 19%
Joe Hudson 53%
Roger Ishee 71%
Michael Janus 82%
Timothy Lamar Johnson 84%
Andrew Ketchings 91%
Ezell Lee 48%
Travis Little 87%
R.L. Livingston 27%
Percy Maples 68%
James Markham, Jr. 69%
Warner McBride 83%
William McCoy 64%
William Miles 73%
William Minor 89%
Thomas Mitchell 73%
T.O. Moffatt 82%
Keith Norris Montgomery, Sr. 91%
Robert Moody 75%
E. Harvey Moss 44%
Clem Mullins Nettles 49%
Diane Peranich 39%
John Raymond Reeves 67%
Thomas Robertson 83%
Valeria Brower Robertson 84%
Eric Robinson 69%
Walter Robinson, Jr. 35%
Charles Ross 87%
Clinton Rotenberry, Jr. 77%
Vincent Scoper, Jr. 93%
Eloise Hale Scott 64%
James Simpson, Jr. 91%
Charles Smith 85%
Robert Harold Smith 38%
Mary Stevens 72%
Joseph Thomas Stogner 74%
Bobby Taylor 65%
Billy Thames 51%
Jimmy Thornton 23%
Bennie Turner 35%
Tom Wallace 52%
Johnnie Walls, Jr. 18%
Carmen Wells-Smith 83%
Phillip West 58%
John Robert White 26%
Richard White 93%
Tommy Woods 92%
Charles Young, Sr. 53%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.