Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Colorado Gerontological Society

2000 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
CO U.S. House 5 Doug Lamborn Republican 46%
CO U.S. House 7 Ed Perlmutter Democratic 100%
CO State Senate 24 Lois Tochtrop Democratic 100%
CO Council Member 3 Keith King Republican 40%
CO Commissioner 2 Steve Johnson 73%
CO Director of the Public Utilities Commission Douglas Allen Dean 33%
Kay Alexander 87%
Norma Anderson 77%
John Andrews 38%
Ken Arnold 62%
Bob Bacon 100%
Gayle Berry 71%
Nolbert Chavez 87%
Ken Chlouber 85%
Lauri Clapp 20%
Fran Coleman 93%
Richard Decker 33%
F. Jim Dyer 92%
Mary Ellen Epps 77%
John Evans 69%
Rob Fairbank 33%
Daniel Grossman 93%
Lynn Christian Hefley 53%
Robert Michael Hernandez 85%
Mark Hillman 62%
Diane Hoppe 67%
Kenneth Kester 67%
Mark Larson 80%
Joyce Lawrence 86%
Don Lee 20%
Douglas Linkhart 100%
Frana Araujo Mace 100%
Stanley Matsunaka 100%
Carl Miller 93%
Shawn Mitchell 20%
Marilyn Musgrave 77%
Alice Nichol 77%
David Owen 62%
Mark Paschall 29%
Pat Pascoe 100%
Terry Phillips 100%
Tom Plant 93%
Ann Ragsdale 93%
Peggy Reeves 100%
Todd Saliman 93%
Glenn Scott 53%
William Sinclair 60%
Matt Smith 64%
Nancy Spence 33%
Lola Spradley 64%
Joseph Stengel, Jr. 40%
William Swenson 71%
Abel Tapia 93%
Ronald Teck 77%
Bill Thiebaut, Jr. 100%
Jennifer Veiga 93%
Valentin Vigil 93%
William Webster 67%
Suzanne Williams 87%
Tambor Williams 53%
John Witwer 64%
Bradley Young 43%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top