| State | Office | District | Name | Party | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ron Brown | 100 | ||||
| WI | State Senate | 13 | Scott Fitzgerald | Republican | 100 |
| WI | State Senate | 10 | Sheila Harsdorf | Republican | 100 |
| WI | State Senate | 11 | Neal Kedzie | Republican | 100 |
| Alan Lasee | 100 | ||||
| WI | State Senate | 9 | Joseph Leibham | Republican | 100 |
| Mary Panzer | 100 | ||||
| WI | State Senate | 17 | Dale Schultz | Republican | 100 |
| Robert Welch | 100 | ||||
| David Zien | 100 | ||||
| WI | State Senate | 8 | Alberta Darling | Republican | 95 |
| Theodore Kanavas | 95 | ||||
| Tom Reynolds | 95 | ||||
| Carol Roessler | 95 | ||||
| Cathy Stepp | 95 | ||||
| WI | State Senate | 19 | Michael Ellis | Republican | 85 |
| WI | State Senate | 27 | Jon Erpenbach | Democratic | 85 |
| WI | State Senate | 28 | Mary Lazich | Republican | 85 |
| WI | Railroad Commissioner | Roger Breske | Democratic | 80 | |
| WI | State Senate | 2 | Robert Cowles | Republican | 80 |
| Mark Meyer | 80 | ||||
| Jeffrey Plale | 80 | ||||
| WI | State Senate | 24 | Julie Lassa | Democratic | 70 |
| Russell Decker | 65 | ||||
| WI | State Senate | 30 | Dave Hansen | Democratic | 60 |
| WI | State Senate | 25 | Robert Jauch | Democratic | 55 |
| WI | U.S. House | 4 | Gwen Moore | Democratic | 50 |
| Judith Robson | 50 | ||||
| WI | State Senate | 22 | Robert Wirch | Democratic | 50 |
| WI | State Senate | 3 | Timothy Carpenter | Democratic | 45 |
| G. Spencer Coggs | 45 | ||||
| WI | State Senate | 26 | Fred Risser | Democratic | 30 |
| Charles Chvala | 25 |
Issues:
Agriculture and Food
How to Interpret these Evaluations
Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.
Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.
