Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Information Technology Industry Council

2007-2008 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Melquiades Martinez 100%
Jim Matheson 86%
Carolyn McCarthy 100%
Thaddeus McCotter 43%
John McHugh 57%
Mike McIntyre 43%
Buck McKeon 86%
Kendrick Meek, Sr. 100%
Charlie Melancon, Sr. 71%
Mike Michaud 43%
Gary Miller 67%
George Miller 86%
Brad Miller 86%
Harry Mitchell 100%
Alan Mollohan 57%
Dennis Moore 100%
Jim Moran, Jr. 100%
Patrick Murphy 57%
Jack Murtha 100%
Sue Myrick 50%
Ben Nelson 100%
Jim Oberstar 67%
Dave Obey 86%
John Olver 57%
Solomon Ortiz, Sr. 100%
Ed Pastor 50%
Ron Paul 0%
Donald Payne 43%
Tom Petri 57%
Todd Platts 57%
Earl Pomeroy 100%
Mark Pryor 100%
George Radanovich 71%
Nick Rahall II 43%
Denny Rehberg 57%
Silvestre Reyes 100%
Laura Richardson 83%
Jay Rockefeller IV 100%
Ciro Rodriguez 71%
Mike Rogers 43%
Mike Ross 100%
Steve Rothman 50%
John Salazar 80%
Ken Salazar 100%
William Sali 57%
Jean Schmidt 71%
Allyson Schwartz 71%
Joe Sestak, Jr. 100%
John Shadegg 43%
Carol Shea-Porter 43%
Heath Shuler 43%
Ike Skelton 100%
Olympia Snowe 100%
Vic Snyder 100%
Mark Souder 67%
Zack Space 86%
Arlen Specter 100%
John Spratt, Jr. 86%
Pete Stark 71%
Cliff Stearns 43%
Ted Stevens 100%
Bart Stupak 71%
John Sullivan 50%
John Sununu 100%
Betty Sutton 86%
Tom Tancredo 50%
John Tanner 100%
Ellen Tauscher 100%
Gene Taylor 43%
Lee Terry 71%
Todd Tiahrt 86%
John Tierney 57%
Ed Towns 100%
Mark Udall 86%
George Voinovich 100%
Zach Wamp 71%
Diane Watson 57%
Mel Watt 100%
Henry Waxman 86%
Jim Webb, Jr. 100%
Anthony Weiner 100%
Robert Wexler 83%
Charlie Wilson, Jr. 50%
Frank Wolf 100%
Lynn Woolsey 75%
David Wu 86%
Bill Young 57%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top