Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Information Technology Industry Council

2007-2008 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Neil Abercrombie 57%
Gary Ackerman 100%
Daniel Akaka, Sr. 80%
Todd Akin 43%
Rodney Alexander 57%
Jason Altmire 43%
Rob Andrews 86%
Michael Arcuri 86%
Joe Baca, Sr. 57%
Michele Bachmann 29%
Spencer Bachus 71%
Brian Baird 100%
J. Gresham Barrett 60%
John Barrow 86%
Roscoe Bartlett 43%
Max Baucus 100%
Evan Bayh 100%
Melissa Bean 100%
Bob Bennett 100%
Shelley Berkley 86%
Howard Berman 100%
Marion Berry 71%
Judy Biggert 71%
Brian Bilbray 43%
Jeff Bingaman 100%
Tim Bishop 100%
Kit Bond 100%
Jo Bonner, Jr. 100%
Mary Bono Mack 100%
Dan Boren 100%
Leonard Boswell 100%
Rick Boucher 86%
Allen Boyd, Jr. 100%
Bruce Braley 100%
Paul Broun 29%
Henry Brown, Jr. 71%
Ginny Brown-Waite 57%
Jim Bunning 80%
Dan Burton 43%
Steve Buyer 33%
Robert Byrd 80%
Dave Camp 57%
John Campbell III 86%
Eric Cantor 71%
Dennis Cardoza 100%
Russ Carnahan 80%
Christopher Carney 43%
Mike Castle 71%
Saxby Chambliss 100%
Ben Chandler III 71%
Travis Childers 0%
Hillary Clinton 100%
Howard Coble 100%
Thomas Coburn 60%
Norm Coleman 100%
Kent Conrad 80%
Jerry Costello 43%
Larry Craig 100%
Artur Davis 100%
David Davis 43%
Geoff Davis 43%
Lincoln Davis 86%
Bill Delahunt 71%
James DeMint 25%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 86%
Norm Dicks 86%
John Dingell 100%
Chris Dodd 100%
Byron Dorgan 60%
David Dreier 100%
Chet Edwards 100%
Vern Ehlers 71%
Brad Ellsworth 100%
Jo Ann Emerson 71%
John Ensign 100%
Bob Etheridge 71%
Russ Feingold 60%
Bob Filner 71%
Barney Frank 100%
Elton Gallegly 83%
Jim Gerlach 71%
Gabrielle Giffords 100%
Phil Gingrey 43%
Charlie Gonzalez 100%
Virgil Goode, Jr. 43%
Bart Gordon 100%
Judd Gregg 80%
John Hall 86%
Ralph Hall 43%
Phil Hare 57%
Tom Harkin 80%
Jane Harman 100%
Doc Hastings 57%
Wally Herger, Jr. 71%
Stephanie Herseth Sandlin 57%
Baron Hill 57%
Maurice Hinchey 43%
Paul Hodes 43%
Pete Hoekstra 33%
Thomas Holden 60%
Rush Holt, Jr. 57%
Kay Hutchison 100%
Bob Inglis, Sr. 71%
Daniel Inouye 100%
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 86%
Tim Johnson 50%
Timothy Johnson 75%
Steve Kagen 71%
Paul Kanjorski 57%
Edward Kennedy, Sr. 100%
Patrick Kennedy 86%
Dale Kildee 57%
Carolyn Kilpatrick 86%
Jack Kingston 43%
Ron Klein 100%
Herb Kohl 100%
Dennis Kucinich 17%
Jon Kyl 40%
Ray LaHood 67%
Mary Landrieu 80%
Tom Latham 57%
Steve LaTourette 43%
Frank Lautenberg 100%
Carl Levin 100%
Jerry Lewis 57%
Joe Lieberman 100%
Blanche Lincoln 100%
John Linder 29%
Dick Lugar 100%
Dan Lungren 83%
Connie Mack IV 29%
Don Manzullo 29%
Jim Marshall 86%
Melquiades Martinez 100%
Jim Matheson 86%
Carolyn McCarthy 100%
Thaddeus McCotter 43%
John McHugh 57%
Mike McIntyre 43%
Buck McKeon 86%
Kendrick Meek, Sr. 100%
Charlie Melancon, Sr. 71%
Mike Michaud 43%
Gary Miller 67%
George Miller 86%
Brad Miller 86%
Harry Mitchell 100%
Alan Mollohan 57%
Dennis Moore 100%
Jim Moran, Jr. 100%
Patrick Murphy 57%
Jack Murtha 100%
Sue Myrick 50%
Ben Nelson 100%
Jim Oberstar 67%
Dave Obey 86%
John Olver 57%
Solomon Ortiz, Sr. 100%
Ed Pastor 50%
Ron Paul 0%
Donald Payne 43%
Tom Petri 57%
Todd Platts 57%
Earl Pomeroy 100%
Mark Pryor 100%
George Radanovich 71%
Nick Rahall II 43%
Denny Rehberg 57%
Silvestre Reyes 100%
Laura Richardson 83%
Jay Rockefeller IV 100%
Ciro Rodriguez 71%
Mike Rogers 43%
Mike Ross 100%
Steve Rothman 50%
Ken Salazar 100%
William Sali 57%
Jean Schmidt 71%
Allyson Schwartz 71%
José Serrano 71%
Joe Sestak, Jr. 100%
John Shadegg 43%
Carol Shea-Porter 43%
Heath Shuler 43%
Ike Skelton 100%
Olympia Snowe 100%
Vic Snyder 100%
Hilda Solis 86%
Mark Souder 67%
Zack Space 86%
Arlen Specter 100%
John Spratt, Jr. 86%
Pete Stark 71%
Cliff Stearns 43%
Ted Stevens 100%
Bart Stupak 71%
John Sullivan 50%
John Sununu 100%
Betty Sutton 86%
Tom Tancredo 50%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top