Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Information Technology Industry Council

2003-2004 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Neil Abercrombie 30%
Gary Ackerman 56%
Daniel Akaka, Sr. 42%
Todd Akin 70%
Rodney Alexander 50%
Wayne Allard 100%
George Allen 100%
Thomas Allen 50%
Rob Andrews 30%
Joe Baca, Sr. 40%
Spencer Bachus 90%
Brian Baird 70%
Richard Hugh Baker 90%
J. Gresham Barrett 70%
Roscoe Bartlett 70%
Charlie Bass 50%
Max Baucus 100%
Evan Bayh 92%
Bob Beauprez 90%
Bob Bennett 100%
Shelley Berkley 75%
Howard Berman 50%
Marion Berry 22%
Judy Biggert 100%
Michael Bilirakis 90%
Jeff Bingaman 58%
Tim Bishop 40%
Sherwood Boehlert 100%
Kit Bond 100%
Henry Bonilla 100%
Jo Bonner, Jr. 90%
Mary Bono Mack 90%
Leonard Boswell 90%
Rick Boucher 67%
Allen Boyd, Jr. 90%
Henry Brown, Jr. 100%
Ginny Brown-Waite 100%
Jim Bunning 100%
Conrad Burns 100%
Dan Burton 80%
Steve Buyer 90%
Robert Byrd 42%
Dave Camp 100%
Chris Cannon 100%
Eric Cantor 100%
Dennis Cardoza 40%
Julia Carson 12%
Edward Case 70%
Mike Castle 67%
Linc Chafee 100%
Saxby Chambliss 82%
Ben Chandler III 100%
Chris Chocola 100%
Hillary Clinton 67%
Howard Coble 70%
Norm Coleman 100%
Kent Conrad 58%
Jon Corzine 67%
Jerry Costello 10%
Christopher Cox 100%
Larry Craig 83%
Robert Cramer 89%
Barbara Cubin 100%
Randall Cunningham 100%
Artur Davis 90%
James Davis 80%
Jo Ann Davis 60%
Lincoln Davis 89%
Thomas Davis III 89%
Bill Delahunt 40%
Thomas DeLay 100%
James DeMint 88%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 90%
Norm Dicks 70%
John Dingell 40%
Chris Dodd 50%
Elizabeth Dole 92%
Pete Domenici, Jr. 100%
John Doolittle 89%
Byron Dorgan 36%
David Dreier 100%
Chet Edwards 89%
Vern Ehlers 100%
Jo Ann Emerson 78%
Philip English 80%
John Ensign 100%
Bob Etheridge 90%
Lane Evans 10%
Terry Everett 78%
Tom Feeney 90%
Russ Feingold 42%
Michael Ferguson 89%
Bob Filner 33%
Mark Foley 100%
Harold Ford, Jr. 89%
Vito Fossella, Jr. 90%
Barney Frank 30%
William Frist 100%
Elton Gallegly 100%
Jim Gerlach 90%
Jim Gibbons 89%
Wayne Gilchrest 78%
Paul Gillmor 67%
Phil Gingrey 89%
Charlie Gonzalez 80%
Virgil Goode, Jr. 50%
Bart Gordon 78%
Mark Green 70%
Judd Gregg 83%
Gilbert Gutknecht 89%
Charles Hagel 100%
Ralph Hall 89%
Tom Harkin 50%
Jane Harman 80%
Katherine Harris 100%
Melissa Hart 100%
J. Dennis Hastert 100%
Doc Hastings 100%
Robert Hayes 60%
J.D. Hayworth, Jr. 90%
Joel Hefley 56%
Wally Herger, Jr. 100%
Stephanie Herseth Sandlin 75%
Maurice Hinchey 20%
David Lee Hobson 90%
Pete Hoekstra 70%
Thomas Holden 50%
Rush Holt, Jr. 40%
Darlene Hooley 78%
John Nathan Hostettler 60%
Kenny Hulshof 100%
Duncan Hunter 60%
Kay Hutchison 92%
Henry Hyde 90%
Daniel Inouye 45%
Ernest Istook, Jr. 88%
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 20%
William Jefferson 90%
James Merrill Jeffords 75%
William Lewis Jenkins 90%
Nancy Johnson 100%
Tim Johnson 80%
Timothy Johnson 36%
Paul Kanjorski 10%
Ric Keller 90%
Sue Kelly 100%
Edward Kennedy, Sr. 42%
Mark Kennedy 100%
Patrick Kennedy 50%
Dale Kildee 20%
Carolyn Kilpatrick 44%
Jack Kingston 90%
Joseph Knollenberg 100%
Herb Kohl 36%
James Kolbe 90%
Dennis Kucinich 11%
Jon Kyl 92%
Ray LaHood 80%
Mary Landrieu 83%
Tom Lantos 12%
Tom Latham 100%
Steve LaTourette 89%
Frank Lautenberg 55%
James Leach 90%
Carl Levin 58%
Jerry Lewis 90%
Ron Lewis 90%
Joe Lieberman 80%
Blanche Lincoln 92%
John Linder 100%
Trent Lott, Sr. 100%
Dick Lugar 100%
Don Manzullo 90%
Jim Marshall 40%
Jim Matheson 100%
Robert Matsui 60%
Carolyn McCarthy 60%
Thaddeus McCotter 90%
James McCrery III 100%
John McHugh 67%
Mike McIntyre 50%
Buck McKeon 90%
Michael McNulty 20%
Martin Meehan 56%
Kendrick Meek, Sr. 50%
Mike Michaud 50%
Juanita Millender-McDonald 44%
Gary Miller 90%
George Miller 33%
Brad Miller 70%
Alan Mollohan 30%
Dennis Moore 100%
Jim Moran, Jr. 80%
Jack Murtha 30%
Marilyn Musgrave 90%
Sue Myrick 100%
Ben Nelson 100%
Robert William Ney 90%
Anne Northup 89%
Charles Norwood, Jr. 62%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top