Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Non Commissioned Officers Association

2002 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
James Ramstad 100%
Ralph Regula 100%
Denny Rehberg 100%
Silvestre Reyes 69%
Thomas Reynolds 85%
Jay Rockefeller IV 100%
Ciro Rodriguez 85%
Mike Rogers 100%
Mike Ross 85%
Steve Rothman 85%
Jim Ryun 100%
Martin Olav Sabo 85%
Max Sandlin, Jr. 85%
Rick Santorum 60%
Paul Sarbanes 100%
Jim Saxton 100%
Edward Schrock 100%
John Shadegg 100%
E. Clay Shaw, Jr. 100%
Christopher Shays 100%
Donald Sherwood 100%
Robert Ruhl Simmons 100%
Ike Skelton 85%
Gordon Smith 100%
Nick Smith 77%
Olympia Snowe 100%
Vic Snyder 62%
Hilda Solis 69%
Mark Souder 100%
Arlen Specter 80%
John Spratt, Jr. 77%
Pete Stark 46%
Cliff Stearns 85%
Charles Stenholm 77%
Ted Stevens 100%
Ted Strickland 85%
Bart Stupak 77%
John Sullivan 100%
John Sununu 92%
John Sweeney 100%
Tom Tancredo 92%
John Tanner 77%
Ellen Tauscher 77%
William Tauzin 100%
Charles Taylor 100%
Gene Taylor 77%
Lee Terry 92%
Craig Thomas 60%
William Thomas 100%
Todd Tiahrt 100%
John Tierney 62%
Ed Towns 54%
Stephanie Tubbs Jones 54%
James Turner 85%
Mark Udall 69%
George Voinovich 60%
James Walsh 100%
Zach Wamp 100%
John Warner 100%
Diane Watson 69%
Mel Watt 58%
Henry Waxman 77%
Anthony Weiner 77%
David Weldon 100%
W. Curtis Weldon 92%
Gerald Weller 100%
Robert Wexler 77%
Heather Wilson 100%
Frank Wolf 100%
Lynn Woolsey 54%
David Wu 77%
Albert Wynn 85%
Bill Young 92%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top