| State | Office | District | Name | Party | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CO | U.S. House | 4 | Cory Gardner | Republican | A |
| CO | State Senate | 1 | Greg Brophy | Republican | A |
| CO | State Senate | 12 | Bill Cadman | Republican | A |
| CO | State Senate | 15 | Kevin Lundberg | Republican | A+ |
| CO | State Senate | 20 | Cheri Jahn | Democratic | D |
| CO | State Senate | 24 | Lois Tochtrop | Democratic | A |
| CO | State Senate | 25 | Mary Hodge | Democratic | F |
| CO | State Senate | 27 | David Balmer | Republican | A |
| CO | State Senate | 28 | Nancy Todd | Democratic | D |
| CO | State Senate | 29 | Morgan Carroll | Democratic | F |
| CO | Insurance Commissioner | James Riesberg | Democratic | F | |
| CO | Council Member | At-Large | Susan Shepherd | Democratic | D |
| CO | Council Member | Susan Shepherd | D | ||
| CO | Commissioner | 2 | Steve Johnson | A | |
| Debbie Benefield | F | ||||
| William Berens | A | ||||
| Alice Borodkin | F | ||||
| Betty Boyd | F | ||||
| Bernie Buescher | A | ||||
| Dorothy Butcher | D | ||||
| Michael Cerbo | F | ||||
| Mark Alan Cloer | A | ||||
| Bill Crane | A | ||||
| Kathleen Curry | A- | ||||
| Lewis Entz | A+ | ||||
| Joan Fitz-Gerald | F | ||||
| K. Jerry Frangas | F | ||||
| Rafael Lorenzo Gallegos | F | ||||
| Michael Garcia | D+ | ||||
| Gwyn Green | F | ||||
| James Isgar | A- | ||||
| Ed Jones | A | ||||
| Maryanne Keller | F | ||||
| James Kerr | A | ||||
| Kenneth Kester | B+ | ||||
| Larry Liston | A | ||||
| Alice Madden | F | ||||
| Thomas Massey, Jr. | A- | ||||
| Michael May | A | ||||
| Bob McCluskey, Jr. | B- | ||||
| Liane McFadyen | A | ||||
| Anne McGihon | F | ||||
| Wes McKinley | C- | ||||
| Michael Merrifield | D | ||||
| John Pommer | F | ||||
| Raymond Rose | A+ | ||||
| Judy Solano | C | ||||
| John Soper | F | ||||
| Debbie Stafford | A+ | ||||
| Abel Tapia | C | ||||
| Paul Weissmann | F | ||||
| Albert White | A+ | ||||
| Robert Witwer | A |
Special Interest Groups
Rating Group: National Rifle Association Political Victory Fund
2006 Positions on Gun Rights
Issues:
Guns
How to Interpret these Evaluations
Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.
Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.
