State Office Name Party Rating
LA U.S. House-1 Steve Scalise R 76%
LA U.S. House-2 Cedric Richmond D 15%
LA Lieutenant Governor Jay Dardenne, Jr. R 100%
LA State House-2 Roy Burrell D 29%
LA State House-13 James Fannin D 90%
LA State House-29 Regina Barrow D 75%
LA State House-35 Brett Geymann R 88%
LA State House-36 Charles Kleckley R 100%
LA State House-41 Mickey Guillory D 56%
LA State House-45 Joel Robideaux R 100%
LA State House-52 Gordon Dove, Sr. R 89%
LA State House-59 Eddie Lambert R 86%
LA State House-60 Karen St Germain D 84%
LA State House-66 Hunter Greene R 90%
LA State House-75 Harold Ritchie D 62%
LA State House-89 Tim Burns R 90%
LA State House-100 Austin Badon, Jr. D 55%
LA State House-102 Jeffery Arnold D 56%
LA State Senate-1 A. Crowe, Jr. R 86%
LA State Senate-3 Jean-Paul Morrell D 17%
LA State Senate-4 Edwin Murray D 100%
LA State Senate-5 Karen Peterson D 30%
LA State Senate-6 Bodi White, Jr. R 100%
LA State Senate-8 John Alario, Jr. R 57%
LA State Senate-10 Daniel Martiny R 67%
LA State Senate-12 Ben Nevers, Sr. D 50%
LA State Senate-13 Dale Erdey R 90%
LA State Senate-14 Yvonne Dorsey-Colomb D 33%
LA State Senate-15 Sharon Broome D 50%
LA State Senate-18 Jody Amedee R 75%
LA State Senate-19 Gary Smith, Jr. D 76%
LA State Senate-25 Dan Morrish R 95%
LA State Senate-27 Ronnie Johns R 100%
LA State Senate-28 Eric LaFleur D 67%
LA State Senate-29 Richard Gallot, Jr. D 43%
LA State Senate-30 John Smith R 71%
LA State Senate-33 Michael Walsworth R 100%
LA State Senate-34 Francis Thompson D 76%
LA State Senate-35 Robert Kostelka R 50%
LA State Senate-36 Robert Adley R 100%
LA State Senate-38 Sherri Buffington R 50%
LA Secretary of State Tom Schedler, Jr. R 100%
LA Commissioner of Agriculture and Forestry Michael Strain R 90%
Ernest Alexander 90%
Glenn Ansardi 62%
Diana Bajoie 50%
Damon Baldone 76%
Robert Barham 100%
Clara Baudoin 56%
Ernest Baylor, Jr. 19%
Gary Beard 94%
Walter Boasso 100%
Shirley Bowler 81%
Beverly Gourdon Bruce 67%
Emile Bruneau 74%
James Cain 25%
Robert Carter 48%
Donald Cazayoux, Jr. 50%
Joel Chaisson II 100%
Carl Crane 100%
Donald Cravins, Jr. 62%
Donald Cravins, Sr. 50%
Israel Curtis 33%
N. J. Damico 76%
William Daniel IV 95%
Carla Dartez 67%
Charles DeWitt, Jr. 38%
Jean Doerge 71%
Hollis Downs 90%
Ann Duplessis 50%
Reggie Dupre, Jr. 75%
Sydnie Mae Durand 95%
Noble Ellington 100%
Rick Farrar 57%
Robert Faucheux, Jr. 90%
Cleo Fields 75%
Heulette Fontenot 100%
Mickey Frith 86%
Butch Gautreaux 100%
Nick Gautreaux 50%
Cedric Bradford Glover 57%
Cheryl Gray Evans 30%
Elcie Guillory 43%
Alexander Heaton 42%
Troy Hebert 43%
Francis Heitmeier 100%
Herman Ray Hill 42%
Donald Hines 50%
Avon Honey 30%
Roy Hopkins 85%
Willie Hunter, Jr. 33%
Nita Hutter 71%
Lydia Jackson 50%
Michael Jackson 38%
Jalila Jefferson-Bullock 24%
Charles Jones 25%
Kay Katz 100%
Donald Kennard 78%
Lelon Kenney 90%
John LaBruzzo, Jr. 74%
Juan LaFonta 16%
Charles Lancaster, Jr. 86%
Arthur Lentini 100%
Max Malone 100%
Robert Marionneaux, Jr. 50%
Charles McDonald 90%
Joe McPherson 50%
Thomas McVea 81%
Michael Michot 100%
Billy Montgomery 71%
Willie Mount 50%
Kenneth Odinet, Sr. 57%
Wilfred Pierre 62%
Gillis Pinac 52%
Loulan Pitre, Jr. 79%
Henry Powell 90%
Michael Powell 90%
Roy Quezaire, Jr. 44%
Craig Romero 100%
Errol Romero 44%
Joe Salter 67%
Matthew Schneider III 78%
M. J. Smiley, Jr. 100%
Jack Smith 71%
Jane Smith 86%
Kenneth Smith 100%
Charmaine Stiaes 17%
Gerald Theunissen 100%
Joseph Toomy 76%
Thomas Townsend 24%
Donald Trahan 86%
Warren Triche, Jr. 89%
Jim Tucker 88%
J. Chris Ullo 100%
Wayne Waddell 95%
Monica Walker 76%
Diane Winston 93%
Ernest Wooton 62%
Thomas Wright 70%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.