| State | Office | District | Name | Party | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ernest Alexander | 91% | ||||
| Glenn Ansardi | 60% | ||||
| Damon Baldone | 77% | ||||
| Clara Baudoin | 27% | ||||
| Ernest Baylor, Jr. | 15% | ||||
| Gary Beard | 93% | ||||
| Shirley Bowler | 92% | ||||
| Beverly Gourdon Bruce | 40% | ||||
| Emile Bruneau | 77% | ||||
| LA | County Member | Thomas John Capella | 75% | ||
| Robert Carter | 30% | ||||
| Donald Cazayoux, Jr. | 48% | ||||
| Carl Crane | 89% | ||||
| Israel Curtis | 13% | ||||
| N. J. Damico | 70% | ||||
| William Daniel IV | 95% | ||||
| Carla Dartez | 74% | ||||
| Emma Devillier | 49% | ||||
| John Diez | 75% | ||||
| Jean Doerge | 40% | ||||
| Hunt Downer, Jr. | 78% | ||||
| Hollis Downs | 92% | ||||
| Sydnie Mae Durand | 59% | ||||
| Rick Farrar | 58% | ||||
| Robert Faucheux, Jr. | 58% | ||||
| Daniel Thomas Flavin | 85% | ||||
| Mickey Frith | 67% | ||||
| Gregory Lee Fruge | 83% | ||||
| Mike Futrell | 89% | ||||
| Cedric Bradford Glover | 23% | ||||
| Kyle Mark Green | 41% | ||||
| Elcie Guillory | 40% | ||||
| Alexander Heaton | 53% | ||||
| Troy Hebert | 73% | ||||
| Herman Ray Hill | 40% | ||||
| Avon Honey | 50% | ||||
| Roy Hopkins | 63% | ||||
| Charles Irvin Hudson | 20% | ||||
| Willie Hunter, Jr. | 15% | ||||
| Nita Hutter | 69% | ||||
| Kay Iles | 24% | ||||
| Lydia Jackson | 38% | ||||
| Kay Katz | 97% | ||||
| Donald Kennard | 84% | ||||
| Lelon Kenney | 68% | ||||
| Charles Lancaster, Jr. | 87% | ||||
| Jerry Luke LeBlanc | 70% | ||||
| Leonard Lucas, Jr. | 21% | ||||
| Charles McDonald | 86% | ||||
| Thomas McVea | 55% | ||||
| Kenneth Odinet, Sr. | 17% | ||||
| Anthony Richard Perkins | 90% | ||||
| Rosalind Magee Peychaud | 50% | ||||
| Gillis Pinac | 28% | ||||
| Loulan Pitre, Jr. | 85% | ||||
| Henry Powell | 78% | ||||
| Roy Quezaire, Jr. | 27% | ||||
| Errol Romero | 72% | ||||
| Joe Salter | 45% | ||||
| Matthew Schneider III | 82% | ||||
| Melinda Schwegmann | 44% | ||||
| B.L. Shaw | 73% | ||||
| Jack Smith | 66% | ||||
| Jane Smith | 67% | ||||
| Jennifer Sneed | 79% | ||||
| Victor Stelly | 75% | ||||
| Patrick Swilling | 39% | ||||
| Joseph Toomy | 76% | ||||
| Warren Triche, Jr. | 73% | ||||
| Jim Tucker | 98% | ||||
| Wayne Waddell | 78% | ||||
| Monica Walker | 92% | ||||
| Diane Winston | 86% | ||||
| Ernest Wooton | 58% | ||||
| Thomas Wright | 89% | ||||
| LA | State House | 102 | Jeffery Arnold | Democratic | 79% |
| LA | State Senate | 15 | Sharon Broome | Democratic | 40% |
| LA | State Senate | 14 | Yvonne Dorsey-Colomb | Democratic | 29% |
| LA | State House | 13 | James Fannin | Democratic | 92% |
| LA | State Senate | 29 | Richard Gallot, Jr. | Democratic | 39% |
| LA | State Senate | 28 | Eric LaFleur | Democratic | 52% |
| LA | Mayor | At-Large | Mitch Landrieu | Democratic | 24% |
| LA | State Senate | 4 | Edwin Murray | Democratic | 13% |
| LA | State Senate | 12 | Ben Nevers, Sr. | Democratic | 48% |
| LA | State Senate | 5 | Karen Peterson | Democratic | 33% |
| LA | U.S. House | 2 | Cedric Richmond | Democratic | 31% |
| LA | State Senate | 19 | Gary Smith, Jr. | Democratic | 61% |
| LA | State Senate | 34 | Francis Thompson | Democratic | 47% |
| LA | State Senate | 8 | John Alario, Jr. | Republican | 44% |
| LA | State Senate | 1 | A. Crowe, Jr. | Republican | 92% |
| LA | State Senate | 13 | Dale Erdey | Republican | 80% |
| LA | State Senate | 27 | Ronnie Johns | Republican | 82% |
| LA | State Senate | 10 | Daniel Martiny | Republican | 68% |
| LA | State Senate | 25 | Dan Morrish | Republican | 87% |
| LA | U.S. House | 1 | Steve Scalise | Republican | 98% |
| LA | State Senate | 30 | John Smith | Republican | 43% |
| LA | Commissioner of Agriculture and Forestry | Michael Strain | Republican | 78% | |
| LA | State Senate | 33 | Michael Walsworth | Republican | 89% |
Special Interest Groups
Rating Group: Louisiana Association of Business and Industry
2000-2003 Positions
Issues:
Business and Consumers
How to Interpret these Evaluations
Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.
Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.
